Iraq War
prospect theory
utility is understood relative to a rederence point and is non linear
utlity is steeper for losses than gains
“loss frame” bargaining range seems to be smaller
understanding fearons model
war happens when bargaining fails
bargaining fails when the reservation value is less than the value of war
fearon says choice is this
u(deal) vs u(war)
reservation value is the u(deal)
windows of opportunity
prospect theory suggests that a window of opportunity is abouy a changing reference point (and a change in power)
if we expect things to get worse, then we are in a loss frame
utility attaches to ancitipated outcomes relative to a reference point
if we are in a loss frame, then we are riskier
Lake on the US Iraq War
bargaining theory main insight: strategic interaction, choice between peace and war
assumptions challenged of fearon:
no domestic politics; lake argues that oil and the domestic politics is very important for the iraq war
also argues sadaam cared a lot abt domestic politics and iran
fearons model has no post war enforcement cost
important bc phase 2 of the iraq war during occupation was the worst part