Background of Dred Scott:
Dred Scott was an African American man from Missouri.
Spent ten years in various courts suing for freedom, aided by abolitionist lawyers.
Scott claimed to be a free citizen of Missouri, arguing his freedom due to living in Illinois and Wisconsin, both free regions.
Decision Details:
Supreme Court ruled against Scott in a 7-2 decision in 1857.
President-elect Buchanan intervened to influence the vote, hoping to show bipartisanship.
Chief Justice Roger B. Taney authored the ruling, bringing in significant implications about race and citizenship.
Taney's Reasoning:
Central question: Can the descendants of slaves become citizens under the U.S. Constitution?
Taney declared that no black American, whether enslaved or free, could be considered a citizen, thereby denying them rights and privileges defined in the Constitution.
Freedom does not equate to citizenship; even the right to vote, held by some black men in Northern states, did not imply citizenship.
State vs. National Citizenship:
Taney argued that states could not grant national citizenship to freed blacks, emphasizing a distinction between state and national membership.
A free black individual might be a citizen of a state (e.g., Massachusetts) but not a citizen of the United States as a whole.
Rights of Citizens:
According to Taney, only white Americans held the true status of U.S. citizens, thereby granting them rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
Citizens migrating to territories retain property rights under the Constitution.
Slavery as National:
Taney’s ruling implied that slave property rights extended to all states, effectively declaring the entire nation as potential slave territory.
Hypothetical scenario: A Southern slaveholder could bring slaves to a free state like Massachusetts, and his slave property would remain valid.
Panic of 1857:
Financial crisis that predominantly affected the North, while the South remained insulated due to high cotton prices.
Southern claims of cotton and slave labor saving the nation during economic turmoil.
Anti-Slavery Response:
The Dred Scott case, along with the Fugitive Slave Act and Kansas-Nebraska Act, rolled back the notion of free territory.
Violence during the Bleeding Kansas conflict highlighted tensions between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions.
Republicans interpreted the Southern and Democratic alliance as a conspiracy termed the "slave power."
This "slave power" was seen as a threat to enslave not only African Americans but also jeopardizing the freedoms of other citizens.