Chapter 17 Notes: A Simple Keynesian Model
The Simple Keynesian Model: A Closed Economy (No Government)
Learning framework and core questions
Equilibrium concept: total income (Y) is at its equilibrium level when it equals aggregate spending (A). In symbols: Y=A.
Equilibrium level of income is the point where spending determines production; production adjusts passively to demand.
Key symbols:
Y = total production, income or output in the economy.
A = total spending or aggregate demand (consumption + investment).
Yf = full-employment level of income.
Historical debate:
Say’s Law (supply creates its own demand): aggregate spending always equals aggregate income, and there can never be insufficient demand.
Keynes’s view: aggregate demand (A) is the force that determines total production or income (Y).
Basic setup and assumptions (the simple model)
The economy consists of only two sectors: households and firms.
Government is absent: no government spending or taxes.
Foreign sector is absent: no exports, imports, or monetary/exchange effects.
Prices are given: no inflation analysis in this model.
Wages are given: no labour market dynamics.
The money stock and interest rates are given: no monetary policy or financial market dynamics.
Spending (demand) is the driving force; production (supply) adjusts passively to changes in demand.
Aggregate demand is the sum of:
The model often uses C and I to construct the aggregate demand: A=C+I.
Consumption spending
The consumption function links household consumption expenditure to total income.
Key properties of consumption:
Consumption rises with income (positive relationship).
There is autonomous consumption even when income is zero (consumption floor).
The increase in consumption is smaller than the increase in income (diminishing marginal propensity to consume).
The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is the slope of the consumption function, denoted by c, and is the ratio of the change in consumption to the change in income:
Non-income determinants of consumption (from Box 17-3):
Interest rates
Expectations
Wealth
The consumption function (as presented) is written as:
Investment spending
Aggregate spending in the economy is the sum of consumption and investment: A=C+I.
The level of investment is considered exogenous in this simple model: the investment function is given and does not depend on current income in the basic setup.
Investment decisions are discussed in context of how investment changes affect overall income (later in the multiplier section).
A typical illustration shows the investment function as a separate relation, often depicted as a vertical or flat line in the simple model, indicating independence from Y.
The simple Keynesian model: closed economy without government
Two key graphical elements:
The aggregate spending (demand) function, A=C+I, which shows how spending depends on the income level through C.
The 45-degree line, which represents all points where income equals expenditure: Y=A.
Equilibrium occurs at the point where the aggregate spending function intersects the 45-degree line. At this point, Y=A and there is no inherent pressure for the economy to expand or contract.
In words: equilibrium income is reached where planned spending equals actual output; if spending exceeds output, production/income will rise; if spending is less than output, production/income will fall.
The algebraic (analytical) version of the model
General expression for the simple closed economy:
Y=C+I
Substituting the consumption function: Y=a+cY+I where a is autonomous consumption and c is the marginal propensity to consume.
Solve for Y:
Y−cY=a+I
(1−c)Y=a+I
Y=1−ca+I
Numerical example from the transcript (Box/Illustration):
Consumption: C=50+0.8Y
Investment: I=150
Aggregate demand: A=C+I=200+0.8Y
Equilibrium condition: Y=A gives
Y=200+0.8Y
0.2Y=200
Y=1000
Interpretation: at the equilibrium level, total income equals total spending, and the 45-degree line intersects the aggregate spending function at that income level.
The 45-degree line and equilibrium income (visual intuition)
The 45-degree line shows all points where income equals expenditure (Y = A).
Equilibrium occurs where the aggregate spending curve crosses the 45-degree line, confirming that production equals spending.
The location of the intersection determines the equilibrium income level.
The algebraic version (summary)
The investment multiplier and its effects
Concept: a change in investment spending (ΔI) affects the equilibrium income by more than the initial change due to successive rounds of spending.
Mechanism (illustrative chain):
An investment project injects income into the economy (wages, profits) that is partially spent by recipients, a portion determined by the MPC (c).
For example, if MPC (c) = 0.8, the initial dose of spending from a new factory might generate 0.8 of a unit of additional spending per unit of initial investment.
Recursively, incomes and spending continue to circulate, creating a multiplied effect on total income.
Example from the transcript (investment of R1 billion, MPC = 0.8):
Initial spending to workers and suppliers leads to an initial income increase of 0.8 × R1 billion = R0.8 billion.
The transcript states: "Total spending in the economy will therefore increase by R800 million (ie 0,8 x R1 billion), hence it will 1,8 billion." [Note: This reflects the text’s phrasing; the standard multiplier result yields a larger total income impact than the initial injection.]
Key formula for the multiplier (in the standard framework):
The multiplier is defined as the ratio of the total change in income to the initial change in investment:
k=ΔIΔY=1−c1
Therefore, the total change in income is: ΔY=kΔI=1−cΔI
Worked example from the transcript (alternative numeric illustration):
If the economy has the consumption function form C=a+cY with a = 2, I = 2, and a proposed investment change; the equilibrium would be determined by the same structural logic, yielding a higher final level of Y than the initial injection due to the multiplier effect.
Alternative numerical example in the transcript for a given setting: {
Given: C=2 million+0.6Y,I=2 million
Equilibrium would be: via Y=a+cY+I with a = 2, c = 0.6, I = 2 → (1 - 0.6)Y = 4 → 0.4Y = 4 → Y = 10\text{ million}</p></li><li><p>Ifinvestmentincreasesby\Delta I = 12\text{ million},thenewequilibriumwouldadjustbythemultiplieramount.</p></li></ul></li><li><p>TheremainderofthemultiplierdiscussionissummarizedinTable17−2andBox17−8(multiplierasageometricseries),andFigure17−10(multipliersummary).</p></li><li><p>ParadoxofthriftisintroducedasarelatedconceptinBox17−9(howattemptstosavemorecanreduceoverallincomeintheshortrun).</p></li></ul><h3collapsed="false"seolevelmigrated="true">Quickrecap:relationshipsanddependencies</h3><ul><li><p>Equilibriumcondition:Y = A = C + I</p></li><li><p>TheconsumptionfunctionlinksCtoincomeviaautonomousconsumptionandMPC:</p><ul><li><p>C = a + cY(asrepresentedinthetranscript)</p></li></ul></li><li><p>Theinvestmentfunctionistreatedasexogenousinthebasicmodel:I = \text{constant}(subjecttochangetostudythemultiplier).</p></li><li><p>Equilibriumincomedependsonbothautonomousspending(a)andinvestment(I)andonthepropensitytoconsume(c):</p><ul><li><p>Y = \dfrac{a + I}{1 - c}</p></li></ul></li><li><p>Themultipliershowshowaninitialchangeininvestmentpropagatesthroughtheeconomytoproducealargerchangeintotalincome:k = \dfrac{1}{1 - c}.</p></li></ul><h3collapsed="false"seolevelmigrated="true">Boxedconceptsandcross−links</h3><ul><li><p>Say’sLawvsKeynesianview:supplycreatesitsowndemandvsaggregatedemanddeterminesoutput.</p></li><li><p>The45−degreelineasagraphicaltooltoidentifyequilibriumpoints.</p></li><li><p>Theparadoxofthrift:increasedsavingduringadownturncanreduceoverallincome.</p></li><li><p>EquilibriumintermsofsavingandinvestmentisavailableinBox17−6(conceptuallinktothesaving−investmentbalance).</p></li></ul><h3collapsed="false"seolevelmigrated="true">Importantmacroconcepts(aslistedinthechapter)</h3><ul><li><p>Macroeconomics</p></li><li><p>Consumptionspending</p></li><li><p>Investmentspending</p></li><li><p>Aggregatespending(demand)</p></li><li><p>Totalproductionorincome</p></li><li><p>Keynesianmodel</p></li><li><p>Equilibrium</p></li><li><p>Inventories(stocks)</p></li><li><p>Say’slaw</p></li><li><p>Consumptionfunction</p></li><li><p>Autonomousconsumption</p></li><li><p>Inducedconsumption</p></li><li><p>Marginalpropensitytoconsume</p></li><li><p>Saving</p></li><li><p>Investmentfunction</p></li><li><p>Excessdemand</p></li><li><p>Excesssupply</p></li><li><p>45−degreeline</p></li><li><p>Equilibriumlevelofincome</p></li><li><p>Multiplier</p></li><li><p>Paradoxofthrift</p></li></ul><h3collapsed="false"seolevelmigrated="true">Referencestotextualfiguresandboxes</h3><ul><li><p>Figure17−3:Theinvestmentfunction</p></li><li><p>Figure17−4:Investmentandthelevelofincome</p></li><li><p>Figure17−5:Theaggregatespendingfunction</p></li><li><p>Figure17−6:The45−degreeline</p></li><li><p>Figure17−7:Theequilibriumlevelofincome</p></li><li><p>Box17−6:Equilibriumintermsofsavingandinvestment</p></li><li><p>Box17−8:Themultiplierasthesumofageometricseries</p></li><li><p>Box17−9:Theparadoxofthrift</p></li></ul><h3collapsed="false"seolevelmigrated="true">Appendix:compactequationsforquickreview</h3><ul><li><p>Consumptionfunction(standardform):C = a + cY</p></li><li><p>Aggregatedemand:A = C + I</p></li><li><p>Equilibriumcondition:Y = A,impliesY = a + cY + I</p></li><li><p>Solveforequilibriumincome: (1 - c)Y = a + I \ Y = \dfrac{a + I}{1 - c} </p></li><li><p>Investmentmultiplier: k = \dfrac{1}{1 - c},\quad \Delta Y = k \Delta I </p></li><li><p>Inthenumericexample:witha = 50, c = 0.8, I = 150,theequilibriumis Y = 1000 $$.