Conflict & Power
CHAPTER 10 — CONFLICT & POWER (FULL + DEFINED + COMPLETE)
Conflict — What It Is
Definition of Conflict: Conflict is defined as a process that occurs when individuals perceive their goals as incompatible or feel that someone is hindering their ability to achieve their objectives.
Perception's Role: Conflict begins with perceptions, meaning how one interprets a situation holds more significance than the situation itself.
Perception Errors:
Self-Enhancing Errors: A cognitive bias where individuals view their own behavior too positively.
Nature of Conflict:
Involves clashes in goals, behaviors, values, or actions.
Considered a process as it unfolds over a series of events and is characterized as dynamic.
Dynamic Nature: It can change, escalate, or de-escalate in unpredictable ways.
Kitchen-Sinking: A phenomenon where unrelated past issues are raised during a current conflict, complicating resolution.
Common Misperception About Conflict
Having conflict does not indicate a failing relationship.
Relationships where members avoid conflict may harbor unresolved issues beneath the surface.
Power — What It Is
Definition of Power: Power refers to the ability to influence or control people and events.
Presence of Power in Relationships:
Balanced Power: Conducive to symmetrical relationships where there's equal influence.
Unbalanced Power: Leads to complementary relationships where one person holds more influence.
Power Currencies
Definition of Power Currency: A power currency, or resource that another person values, enhances individual power.
Types of Power Currencies:
Resource Currency: Material possessions or access to essential resources such as money, property, or food.
Expertise Currency: Specialized knowledge or skills others rely upon.
Social Network Currency: Connections with influential individuals such as friends and family.
Personal Currency: Desirable qualities like charisma, physical attractiveness, intelligence, humor, and confidence.
Intimacy Currency: A unique bond with someone, fostering influence due to the depth of the relationship.
Approaches to Handling Conflict (Styles)
Each conflict style is defined with its consequences:
Avoidance: Ignoring the conflict or refusing to discuss it.
Includes: Skirting (changing the topic) and sniping (making a negative comment and leaving).
Risks:
Cumulative Annoyance: Irritation that builds over time.
Pseudo-Conflict: The perception of conflict when no real conflict exists.
May lead to separation between individuals.
Accommodation: Giving up one’s goals to satisfy the other’s desires.
Typically occurs due to power imbalances or a high regard for the relationship.
Competition: High concern for self with a low concern for the partner’s goals, primarily focused on winning.
Consequences:
Defensive communication, which may lead to escalation of the conflict.
Reactivity: Involves no real attempt to pursue goals or resolve issues.
Characterized by emotionally explosive and negative communication, including yelling, crying, accusations, or abuse.
This style is considered destructive and non-strategic.
Collaboration: High concern for both parties' goals, regarded as the most constructive style.
Characteristics:
Focus on attacking the problem rather than the person.
Emphasis on shared interests and generating options before deciding.
Joint evaluation of solutions.
Associated with the highest levels of relational satisfaction.
Short-Term Conflict Outcomes
Possible Immediate Results Based on Conflict Handling:
Separation: One party withdraws following avoidance.
Domination (Win-Lose): One party’s objectives are met while the other’s are not, typically when one party possesses greater power.
Compromise: Both parties modify their goals to reach a middle ground.
Integrative Agreements (Win-Win): Creative solutions where both parties maintain their original objectives, relying on high trust and collaboration.
Structural Improvements: Alterations to the rules or expectations of the relationship to prevent future conflicts.
What Hinders Constructive Conflict Management?
Common barriers to effective conflict management include:
Self-Enhancing Biases: Perceiving oneself as a victim or as the “good guy.”
Attribution Errors: Misunderstanding others' motives, often attributing malicious intent (“They’re doing this on purpose”).
Destructive Messages: Using name-calling, threats, or expressing contempt during conflict.
Poor Emotional Regulation: Responding instead of reacting appropriately.
Power Struggles: Focusing on who wins rather than resolving the conflict itself.
Lack of Collaborative Mindset: Unwillingness to identify shared goals for resolution.
Conflict & Gender/Culture
Gender and cultural differences can affect power dynamics, conflict norms, and comfort levels with confrontation:
Women often socialized with an inclination toward accommodation; men typically message competition.
Cultural Influences:
Direct vs. indirect conflict styles.
Emotional expression comfort.
Authority perception and face-saving mechanisms.
Cultural Paradigms:
Individualistic Cultures: Favor direct conflict and self-expression.
Collectivistic Cultures: Prioritize harmony, indirect conflict methods, and group cohesion.
Class Discussion Examples
Specific scenarios illustrated for conceptual understanding include:
Conflicts between Dr. Jackie and her spouse highlight power balancing.
Disagreements with children exemplify complementary power dynamics.
Faculty disagreements illustrate symmetrical power dynamics.
KEY TAKEAWAYS FOR EXAM
Essential concepts include:
Conflict constitutes perceptions, incompatible goals, a process, and dynamic characteristics.
Kitchen-sinking refers to introducing unrelated topics during conflict.
Power is a constant element; differentiate between symmetrical and complementary power dynamics.
Five power currencies, five conflict styles, and their consequences.
Collaboration is linked to the highest relational satisfaction, while avoidance leads to separation, competition leads to escalation, and reactivity is destructive.
Integrative agreements yield win-win solutions, while structural improvement signifies long-term changes in relationship management.