Subnational and Multi-level Politics: Federal, Unitary, and Confederal Systems
Overview of Territorial Organization in Modern States
All modern states are divided on a territorial basis between central (national) and peripheral (regional, provincial, or local) institutions.
The balance between centralization and decentralization is shaped by wide-ranging factors:
Historical factors.
Cultural factors.
Geographical factors.
Economic factors.
Political factors.
The most prominent factor is the constitutional structure of the state, specifically the location of sovereignty in the political system.
The constitutional structure provides the minimum framework within which center-periphery relationships are conducted.
Common forms of territorial organization:
Federal systems.
Unitary systems.
A third form, confederation, is generally considered unsustainable as it establishes the loosest and most decentralized political union by vesting sovereign power in peripheral bodies.
Federal Systems and States
The term "federalism" originates from the Latin word "foedus," meaning "pact" or "covenant."
Federalism refers to legal and political structures that distribute power territorially within a state.
Definition: A system of government in which sovereignty is shared between central and peripheral levels, with both levels possessing their own areas of jurisdiction.
Key Requirement: Federalism requires two distinct levels of government, neither of which is legally or politically subordinate to the other.
Central Feature: Shared sovereignty.
Global Reach: Over one-third (approx. ) of the world’s population is governed by states with federal structures.
Examples of Federal States:
USA (The world’s first federal state).
Brazil.
Pakistan.
Australia.
Mexico.
Switzerland.
Nigeria.
Malaysia.
Canada.
Sharing Sovereignty in Practice: In theory, neither level can encroach on the powers of the other.
Exclusive state-government domains: Health, education, and state taxes.
Exclusive Federal Government responsibilities: National defense, foreign relations, and the minting of money.
Theoretical Basis: Federal systems are a compromise between unity and regional diversity, balancing the need for effective central power with the need for checks and constraints on that power.
Common Features of Federalism
The relationship between national and regional levels is determined by constitutional rules and a complex of political, historical, geographical, cultural, and social circumstances.
Two relatively autonomous levels of government: Both the federal level and the state level possess powers (legislative, executive, and revenue-raising capacity) on which the other cannot encroach, ensuring fiscal independence.
Written Constitution:
Responsibilities and powers are defined in a codified or ‘written’ constitution.
The center-periphery relationship exists within a formal legal framework.
Neither level can amend the constitution unilaterally.
Constitutional Arbiter:
A Supreme Court interprets the formal provisions of the constitution.
The court arbitrates disputes between federal and state governments.
The judiciary determines how federalism works in practice, drawing it into the policy process.
Centralization trends in the century were sanctioned by the courts.
Linking Institutions:
Regions and provinces must have a voice in central policy-making to foster cooperation.
This is typically achieved via a bicameral legislature.
The second chamber (upper house) represents state interests.
Example: The Canadian Senate has a total of seats. These are assigned on a regional basis, with four major regions receiving seats each, and the remainder assigned to smaller regions.
Factors Influencing the Formation of Federations
External Threats: Small, strategically vulnerable states may enter political unions to play a more effective role in international affairs or defend against threats.
Geographical Size: Many large states opt for federalism. Examples include:
USA.
Canada (federated in ).
Brazil (federated in ).
Australia (federated in ).
Mexico (federated in ).
India (federated in ).
Large states are often culturally diverse with strong regional traditions, creating pressure for decentralization (transfer of powers away from national bodies) and the dispersal of power.
Cultural and Ethnic Heterogeneity: Federalism serves as an institutional response to societal divisions.
Example: Canada’s provinces reflect long-established regional traditions and cultural/language differences between English-speaking and French-speaking populations.
Evaluation of Federal Systems
Strengths:
Guarantees a political voice for regional and local interests via autonomous powers and representation in central government.
Creates a network of checks and balances to protect individual liberty by diffusing power.
James Madison’s principle: ‘ambition must be made to counteract ambition’.
Provides an institutional mechanism to maintain unity in fractured or ethnically diverse societies.
Weaknesses:
Inability to stem the -century tendency toward centralization (concentration of power at the national level due to economic intervention and central revenue-raising capacity).
Potential for frustration and paralysis: Constraints on central authority can make implementing bold economic or social programs difficult.
Risk of disintegration: Breeding governmental division may strengthen centrifugal pressures, leading to instability or ultimate collapse.
Unitary States and Systems
Definition: A system of government where sovereignty is located in a single national institution, allowing the center to control the periphery.
One level of government (central) retains the bulk of political power.
Examples: United Kingdom, Japan, and Saudi Arabia.
The vast majority of contemporary states are unitary.
The UK Example: Sovereign power is vested in Parliament. In theory, Parliament has unrivalled legislative authority; it can make or unmake any law, is not checked by a codified constitution, and its laws outrank all others (English and Scottish law).
Peripheral or local governments exist at the pleasure of the center; they can be reshaped, reorganized, or abolished at will.
Local Government in Unitary Systems
Definition: Government specific to a locality (village, district, town, city, or county) with no share in sovereignty and total subordination to the center (or state/regional authority in a federal system).
Universal Presence: Found in federal, confederal, and unitary systems.
In the USA, there are over units of local government employing people (compared to fewer than at federal and state levels).
In unitary systems, local government is often the only form of government outside the center.
Relevance: Administratively necessary and "close" to the people. Elected local politicians possess democratic legitimacy, leading to bargaining and negotiation with the center rather than simple commands (diktats).
Influencing Factors: Political culture (traditions of autonomy) and the nature of the party system. Note that politicization by national parties can lead to greater centralization.
Autonomy Reliance: In unitary systems, local autonomy relies heavily on the self-restraint of the center.
Devolution
Definition: The transfer of power from central government to subordinate regional institutions. It creates an intermediate tier between central and local government.
Difference from Federalism: Devolved bodies have no share in sovereignty.
Administrative Devolution: Regional institutions implement policies decided elsewhere.
Legislative Devolution (Home Rule): Establishment of elected regional assemblies with policy-making responsibilities.
Legislative devolution represents the maximum decentralization possible in a unitary system without becoming a federal system.
Devolution is often a response to centrifugal tensions or nationalist pressures.
Once devolved assemblies gain political identity and democratic legitimacy, they are difficult to weaken and nearly impossible to abolish.
Example - Spain: Unitary since the , divided into provinces. Post- (death of General Franco), the process extended in with the creation of autonomous communities, especially to meet demands in Catalonia and the Basque area.
Evaluation of Unitary Systems
Strengths:
Boosting Participation: Local government acts as a more effective agent of participation as more people can hold office or engage in local campaigns.
Greater Responsiveness: Peripheral bodies are closer to the people and more sensitive to specific community needs.
Increased Legitimacy: Decisions made locally are seen as more intelligible and legitimate compared to geographically remote centralized decision-making.
Weaknesses:
Lack of Experimentation: Limited autonomy for local governments means policies are not easily adapted to unique regional needs.
Centralized Power Risks: Can lead to corruption, nepotism, regional divides, and autocracy.
Detachment: Central government is often disconnected from local realities.
Workload: Concentration of power creates an overly heavy burden for the central government.
Inequity: National resources may not be distributed evenly; minority interests may be neglected for political reasons.
Stifled Initiative: Citizens may become habituated to waiting for central government action, suppressing local initiative.
Confederal States
Definition: The loosest and most decentralized political union where sovereign power is vested in peripheral bodies.
Historical Advocates: Anarchists such as Pierre-Joseph Proudhon.
Intergovernmentalism: Most commonly found in international organizations:
NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization).
UN (United Nations).
AU (African Union).
Commonwealth of Nations.
Nation-State Examples: Rare.
USA: Originally a confederation under the Continental Congresses (-) and the Articles of Confederation (-).
CIS (Commonwealth of Independent States): Formally replaced the USSR in . Established by of the former Soviet republics (Georgia and the three Baltic states refused). The CIS lacks executive authority and serves mainly as a forum for debate.
Sustainability: Confederations often transform into federal states (e.g., USA) or succumb to centrifugal pressures and disintegrate (e.g., CIS).