Consumer Protection and Competition Law
BUSINESS LAW: CONSUMER PROTECTION AND COMPETITION LAW
INTRODUCTION
Topic covers Consumer Protection and Competition Law under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL).
The structure of the topic is as follows:
Consumer Protection
KC1: Introduction to ACL and Product Liability
KC2: Misleading and Deceptive Conduct
KC3: Unconscionable Conduct
KC4: Unfair Contract Terms
Competition Law
KC5: Cartel
KC6: Exclusive Dealing
KC7: Misuse of Market Power
KC8: Anti-competitive Merger
PROTECTING CONSUMERS
Consumers have the right to additional protection under Australian law.
This is because consumers are often at a disadvantage when dealing with businesses due to:
Businesses typically have more knowledge about their products.
Businesses possess greater experience in business dealings.
Businesses have better access to resources compared to individual consumers.
CONSUMER PROTECTION REGULATION
The Australian Consumer Law (ACL) governs rules regarding advertising and sales to consumers.
The ACL is included in Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA).
It replaced the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth).
JURISDICTION
The ACL is enforced across all Australian jurisdictions.
As a Commonwealth law, it regulates corporate conduct nationwide, and as a State or Territory law, it applies to all business entities and transactions within those jurisdictions.
AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION (ACCC)
The ACCC administers the ACL and aims to:
Promote competition and fair trading in the marketplace.
Regulate national infrastructure services.
Ensure compliance with competition and consumer protection laws.
STATE AND TERRITORY CONSUMER PROTECTION AGENCIES
Each State and Territory has its own consumer protection agency, e.g.:
ACT: ACT Fair Trading
NSW: NSW Fair Trading
NT: NT Consumer Affairs
QLD: QLD Office of Fair Trading
SA: SA Consumer and Business Services
MEANING OF ‘CONSUMER’
Defined by ACL s 3:
A person is considered a consumer if:
(a) The goods are ordinarily for personal, domestic, or household use.
(b) The goods consist of a vehicle or trailer for public road transport.
Excluded transactions under the ACL, where subsection does not apply:
Goods acquired for re-supply.
Goods used in trade or commerce:
During production/manufacture.
In repairing or treating goods or fixtures on land.
PRODUCT LIABILITY
ACL defines product liability and includes all parties:
Manufacturers
Suppliers of goods
CONSUMER GUARANTEE
ACL Part 3.2 establishes mandated guarantees for consumer dealings:
Applies for any transactions under $100,000 or where goods are for personal consumption.
Similar guarantees to those under state Sale of Goods Acts.
ACL guarantees cannot be modified or excluded (s 64).
PRODUCT LIABILITY - MANUFACTURER
See ACL s 7; includes:
Growers
Importers
Assemblers
Concurrent liability on all manufacturers (s 144 ACL).
PRODUCT LIABILITY - SERVICES
Includes sales, leases, and hire. Must relate to goods, not just services.
Services must be delivered with due skill and care (Spittles v Michael’s Appliance Services Pty Ltd ss 60-62 ACL).
PRODUCT LIABILITY - GOODS
Defined by ACL s 2 to include ships, aircraft, electricity, software and second-hand goods.
Acceptable quality (s 54) includes safety and being free of defects, which is context-dependent.
PRODUCT LIABILITY - SAFETY DEFECTS
Under ACL s 9, a consumer expectations test is applied for defectiveness.
Defences in s 142 ACL include:
Safety defect did not exist.
Defect arose due to Commonwealth mandatory standard.
The state of scientific knowledge did not identify defect.
MANDATORY STANDARDS
Mandatory safety standards make particular safety features compulsory for legal market supply in Australia.
The minister can impose standards that set product compliance requirements.
Non-compliance is an offence with listed penalties.
Mandatory information standards ensure the provision of important product details to consumers, e.g., ingredient or label requirements.
SUBSECTION: MISLEADING AND DECEPTIVE CONDUCT
Prohibited under ACL s 18, which states that a person must not engage in conduct that is misleading, deceptive, or likely to mislead or deceive.
Breach of this section allows individuals to sue for remedies.
EXAMPLES OF MISLEADING CONDUCT
ACCC v Qantas Airways Ltd [2024] - Qantas penalized for selling tickets for canceled flights.
Gillette Australia Pty Ltd v Energizer Australia Pty Ltd (2002) - Energizer sued for misleading advertising by comparing different battery types.
DETERMINING MISLEADING OR DECEPTIVE CONDUCT
The assessment standard is based on what an unsuspecting, modest member of the community would perceive, not the reasonable person.
Even silence in negotiations can constitute misleading conduct.
CONDUCT THAT MAY BE MISLEADING
Claims that are true but provide misleading impressions may be deemed misleading, e.g., advertisements with small print disclaimers.
Puffery, which involves exaggerated claims, may not be considered misleading if clearly intended to attract consumers.
TARGET AUDIENCE
The evaluation in the context of misleading conduct includes assessing intelligence levels and expectations.
UNCONSCIONABLE CONDUCT
Defined in ACL s 20: Conduct that is unconscionable in trade or commerce is prohibited and refers to unfair advantage.
FACTORS CONSIDERED IN UNCONSCIONABLE CONDUCT
Bargaining positions, customer understanding, information disclosure, and prior conduct impact assessments.
VULNERABLE CONSUMERS
Certain consumers may be considered vulnerable due to factors such as low income, disability, and age, which can influence their ability to negotiate fairly.
REMEDIES
Options may include refusing to enforce contract provisions, varying contracts, refunds, compensation, and potential fines.
COMPETITION LAW
Key aspects include lessening competition, exclusive dealing, misuse of market power, cartels, and anti-competitive mergers.
MARKET DEFINITION
Market evaluation includes economic functions, types of products, and geographic coverage.
CARTEL CONDUCT
Defined as arrangements limiting competition by fixing prices or controlling outputs.
Cartel conduct is illegal, regardless of impact on competition.
EXAMPLES OF CARTEL CONDUCT LEGAL CASES
ACCC v Flight Centre and TPC v TNT Australia Pty Ltd demonstrate legal consequences for engaging in cartel behavior.
MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
Merger: Combining two organizations into one.
Acquisition: Purchasing an organization or assets.
Mergers and acquisitions that substantially lessen competition are prohibited under s 50 CCA, which lists various factors for assessment, such as market concentration and availability of substitutes.
CONCLUSION
The notes cover both consumer rights in Australia and business obligations, emphasizing the Australia Consumer Law and its enforcement frameworks.