Scientific Method and Hypothesis Testing Notes

Null Hypothesis and P-Value Decision Rules

Handwritten study notes covering the scientific method, null hypothesis, hypothesis characteristics, faulty methods, and operational definitions

  • Definition of the Null Hypothesis:
    • The null hypothesis serves as a baseline assumption in research stating that no effect, no difference, or no statistical relationship exists between specified variables in a population.
  • Decision rules based on the p-value (PP):
    • P<0.05P < 0.05:
    • Action: Reject the null hypothesis.
    • Statistical Significance: Significant result.
    • Empirical Implication: A statistically meaningful relationship exists between the variables.
    • P>0.05P > 0.05:
    • Action: Accept (fail to reject) the null hypothesis.
    • Statistical Significance: Non-significant result.
    • Empirical Implication: No statistically meaningful relationship exists between the variables.

The Scientific Method

  • Primary Function:
    • Used systematically to make objective and reliable empirical observations.
  • Sequential Steps of the Scientific Method:
    1. State problem / ask a question: Identify and define the central scientific problem or question under investigation.
    2. Background research: Review existing literature, theoretical frameworks, and prior empirical data relevant to the inquiry.
    3. Construct hypothesis: Formulate a clear, predictive proposition regarding the outcome of the research.
    4. Collect data: Gather empirical data through structured, systematic measurement techniques.
    5. Analyse data & draw conclusion: Evaluate the collected quantitative or qualitative data to draw sound statistical and theoretical conclusions.
    6. Communicate: Report and disseminate findings through scientific channels for peer review, replication, and scientific progress.

Five Characteristics of a Good Hypothesis

  • Key criteria required for a robust scientific hypothesis:
    • Logical: Rooted in established theories, preliminary evidence, and sound reasoning.
    • Specific: Clearly specifies the involved variables, target population, and precise nature of the predicted relationship.
    • Testable: Capable of empirical measurement and observational evaluation.
    • Falsifiable: Constructed such that empirical observations could potentially demonstrate it to be untrue.
    • Declarative prediction: Expressed as a direct, definitive predictive statement rather than an open question.

Faulty Methods of Knowledge Acquisition

  • Non-scientific methods prone to errors, bias, and unreliability:
    • Authoritative (Authority): Accepting information as fact simply because it originates from an authoritative figure, expert, or institution without demanding empirical proof.
    • Intuition: Relying on gut feelings, spontaneous instincts, or subjective hunches rather than objective analysis.
    • Personal experience: Drawing broad generalizations based solely on individual, subjective anecdotes and personal observations.
    • Tenacity: Persistently holding onto beliefs or traditions out of habit or historical practice, even in the presence of contradictory evidence.

Hypothetical Constructs vs. Operational Definitions

  • Conceptual frameworks in scientific research:
    • Hypothetical Constructs (Abstract):
    • Theoretical, non-observable mechanisms, internal states, or abstract attributes (e.g., intelligence, anxiety, motivation) that cannot be directly measured.
    • Operational Definitions (Specific):
    • Concrete, detailed descriptions of exact operational procedures and measurement metrics used to quantify or manipulate a hypothetical construct.