Market Failure: Externalities
Market Failure: Externalities
Introduction
Course: ECO 2023: Introductory Microeconomics
Instructor: Viviana Rodriguez
Semester: Fall 2025
Concept of Market Failure
Definition: Market failure occurs when an unregulated market does not maximize total surplus, leading to inefficiency.
Key Causes of Market Failure:
Absence of Property Rights
This week focuses on externalities.
Next week will cover public goods.
Market Power
Asymmetric Information
Externalities
Definition: An externality is an activity that imposes costs or benefits on third parties who are not involved in the activity.
Third Party Problem: External costs or benefits are not integrated into decision-making, leading decision-makers to fail in internalizing these costs or benefits.
Result: Activities are performed either too much (over-performed) or too little (under-performed) relative to social optimal levels.
Types of Externalities
Negative Externalities: Involve external costs.
Positive Externalities: Involve external benefits.
Can occur on either side of the market:
Production Externalities: Marginal Social Costs (MSC) ≠ Marginal Private Costs (MPC); affects supply curve.
Consumption Externalities: Marginal Social Benefits (MSB) ≠ Marginal Private Benefits (MPB); affects demand curve.
Negative Externalities
Examples Include:
Air Pollution
Production Waste
Water Pollution
Effects of Negative Production Externalities on Equilibrium
Scenario:
Equilibrium Quantity (Q) = 4.5
Equilibrium Price (P) = $5.50
Illustrates the shift in price and quantity due to the externality, with a cost of $3.00.
Social Optimum:
Price (P) = $7
Quantity (Q) = 3
Total Surplus Implication
Total Surplus can be calculated:
Consumer Surplus (CS) = $10.125
Producer Surplus (PS) = $10.125
External Cost (EC) = $13.50
Total Surplus (TS) = $6.75
Deadweight Loss (DWL) = $2.25
Negative Consumption Externalities
Examples Include:
Second-Hand Smoke
Driving
Equilibrium Effects
Equilibrium Quantity (Q) = 4.5
Equilibrium Price (P) = $5.50
Social Optimum calculations relate to the same externality cost of $3.00.
Social Optimum Values:
Quantity (Q) = 3
Price (P) = $4.00
Total Surplus Calculations Again
Same calculations apply:
Consumer Surplus (CS) = $10.125
Producer Surplus (PS) = $10.125
External Cost (EC) = $13.50
Total Surplus (TS) = $6.75
Deadweight Loss (DWL) = $2.25
Positive Externalities
Definition: Situations that produce external benefits.
Examples Include:
Research
Vaccination
Positive Production Externalities
Equilibrium Effects:
Equilibrium Quantity (Q) = 3.5
Equilibrium Price (P) = $6.50
Social Optimum values indicate a price of $5.00 and quantity of 5 units.
Total Surplus Calculation for Positive Production Externalities
Consumer Surplus (CS) = $6.125
Producer Surplus (PS) = $6.125
External Benefit (EB) = $10.50
Total Surplus (TS) = $22.75
Deadweight Loss (DWL) = $2.25
Positive Consumption Externalities
Equilibrium Effects: Scenario where positive benefits arise.
Equilibrium Quantity (Q) = 3
Equilibrium Price (P) = $4.00
Social Optimum indicates a price of $5.50 and quantity of 4.5.
Total Surplus for Positive Consumption Externalities
Consumer Surplus (CS) = $4.50
Producer Surplus (PS) = $4.50
External Benefit (EB) = $9.00
Total Surplus (TS) = $18.00
Deadweight Loss (DWL) = $2.25
Coase Theorem
Definition: If there are zero transaction costs and property rights are fully specified, resource allocation will not depend on the distribution of property rights.
Application Example: Sturges v. Bridgman (1879) - a case illustrating the need to allocate property rights between neighbors to reduce externalities.
Example Activity
Pair up with a partner.
Role-play as businesses: a doctor and a confectioner.
Discuss costs and resource allocations linked to disruptions caused by noise.
Judicial Decisions
Decisions regarding property rights:
Confectioner possesses the right to make noise.
Doctor possesses the right to silence.
Possible Outcomes:
Confectioner compensates the doctor.
Doctor pays for a sound barrier.
Total Surplus in Judicial Ruling
Persists on balancing costs and ultimately achieving optimum alignment of revenues and expenses.
Economic Implications of Externalities
Markets demonstrate inefficiency under externalities leading to potential deadweight loss (DWL).
Goal: Reaching social optimum in the presence of externalities, as suggested by Coase Theorem regarding property rights.
Coase Theorem Reiteration
Crucial to address property rights and transaction costs when discussing externalities.
Total surplus must be evaluated based on the agreements deriving from property rights distribution.
Applications of Externality Solutions
Cap-and-Trade Programs: Designed to cap total emissions by issuing limited permits for pollution.
Government controls total emissions through a limited number of annual permits.
Each allowance permits one ton of emissions, creating rights to pollution.
Companies have financial incentives to reduce emissions as permit prices rise over time.
Pigouvian Taxes:
Definition: Designed to ensure that firms internalize externalities.
Examples:
Carbon taxes impose costs based on emissions.
Congestion pricing minimizes urban traffic.
Internalizing Externalities via Taxes
Efficiency is improved by taxing at levels that reflect marginal external costs.
Example:
An unregulated market might reveal: P = $5.50 and Q = 4.5.
The goal is to achieve P = $7 and Q = 3 through the designed tax to internalize the externality.
Total Surplus under Pigouvian Taxes
Calculation Factors to Consider:
Marginal External Cost = $3.00
Consumer Surplus, Producer Surplus, Gross Revenue (GR), and variations in Total Surplus are essential for evaluating overall market efficiency.