Social Cognitive Theory
Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) - Study Notes
Overview
Course Information
Course Code: HBHEQ 600
Topic: Social Cognitive Theory
Instructors:
Kristi E. Gamarel, PhD (she/her)
Victoria Davis, PhDc (she/her)
Date: October 20, 2025
Agenda
Description of SCT
Application of SCT concepts
Storytelling and counter storytelling
Activity related to the topics covered
Course Integration
SCT Placement in Course Sequence:
Weeks 1-3: Framing
Weeks 4-5: Critical Perspectives & Stress
Week 5: Cognitive Theories
Week 6: Motivation & Readiness & Purpose
Week 7: Contextual Drivers (behavioral economics & social support)
Week 8: Place-Based Theories
Week 9: Social Cognitive Theory
Brief History of Social Cognitive Theory
Origins:
SCT evolved from Social Learning Theory.
Albert Bandura's Contributions:
In the 1960s, began exploring how individuals learn through observing others, beyond rewards or punishments.
Realization of the role of self-efficacy—individual beliefs in their capabilities—in learning processes.
1980s Expansion:
Broadened to include collective efficacy.
Applications extended to media, health promotion, and community change.
Core Concept: Reciprocal Determinism
Definition:
Behavior, person, and environment are in a continuous cycle of influence on each other.
Individuals actively shape their surroundings while also being shaped by them.
SCT serves as a link between individual behaviors and structural contexts.
Key Constructs of Social Cognitive Theory
Constructs and Definitions:
Self-efficacy:
The belief in one’s ability to execute behaviors necessary to produce specific performance attainments.
Outcome Expectations:
Anticipated consequences resulting from actions or behaviors.
Observational Learning:
Learning that occurs through observing the behaviors of others and the outcomes of those behaviors.
Reinforcement:
The processes through which behaviors are strengthened or weakened by rewards and punishments.
Collective Efficacy:
The shared belief in the group's ability to achieve collective goals.
SCT in Action: Practical Application
Study by Wethington & Kessler (1986):
Goal:
To increase engagement in HIV care among racially and ethnically minoritized communities.
Approach:
Utilized short, culturally tailored narrative role-model stories based on real community experiences.
Each narrative:
Illustrated an individual overcoming barriers (e.g., transportation, stigma, mistrust, medication side effects).
Modeled problem-solving and perseverance in accessing care.
Provided practical information including clinic particulars, transportation routes, and contact details to enhance access.
Contextual Influences on Behavior
Case Study:
CHASS Center's Food-as-Medicine Program in Detroit:
Key Question:
“Who actually gets to benefit?”
SCT indicates behavior is heavily influenced by environmental contexts.
Environments are shaped by elements such as power dynamics, safety, and accessibility.
Critical Theoretical Frameworks
Critical Race Theory (CRT):
Examines systemic racism embedded in institutions, moving beyond individual bias.
Challenges the notion of “neutral” knowledge or colorblind policies.
Prioritizes the lived experiences of those affected by social inequities.
Counter-Storytelling:
Arises from CRT, providing a method to contest predominant narratives.
Employs personal stories to reveal the influence of power and privilege regarding whose voices are recognized.
Validates personal experiences as valuable knowledge for both theory and social change.
Discussion: Applying Counter-Storytelling
Group Discussion Questions:
Identify whose voices are present in Berkley-Patton et al. (2009) narratives.
Consider whose perspectives may be overlooked or marginalized.
Discuss the dominant narrative of HIV care that the intervention risks reinforcing.
Explore how a counter-storytelling framework may complicate or contest that narrative.
Envision how this could alter the design and success metrics of the intervention.
Insights from Counter-Stories to SCT
Revelations from Counter-Stories:
Understanding who learns from these narratives under specified conditions.
Identifying who has authority over those conditions.
Re-evaluating SCT Constructs through a Structural Lens:
Self-efficacy:
Can be constrained by systemic barriers.
Collective Efficacy:
Expands definitions to include community advocacy and mobilization.
Observational Learning:
Encompasses witnessing resistance and the establishment of care networks.
Reinforcement:
Is governed by broader systems and institutions, moving beyond peer influence.
Environment:
Encompasses social, economic, and political structures that impact individual and collective actions.
Interconnections among Theories and Models
Examination of how cognition, motivation, stress, support, and spatial contexts interrelate.
Inquiry into the intricacies when interpreting one theoretical lens through another.
Identifying boundaries between individual, interpersonal, and community models versus structural theories.
Potential of counter-storytelling to surface overlooked aspects in existing theories.
Future Class Schedule Updates
Upcoming Topics:
October 22: Diffusion of Innovations
October 27: Implementation Science
October 29: Healthcare System-based Theories & Group Work
November 3: Social Media
November 5: Community and Participatory Strategies
November 10: Group Work
November 12: Social vs. Structural Drivers
November 17: Social Ecological Model Revisitation
November 19: Planning Models
November 24: Political Advocacy
November 26: Thanksgiving Break
December 1-3: Presentations
December 8: Presentation & Wrap-Up
Contact Information
Kristi Gamarel, PhD, EdM
Email: kgamarel@umich.edu
Victoria Davis, PhDc, MS
Email: vhdavis@umich.edu