Psychology Foundations: Definition, Empiricism, Normative vs Abnormal, and Memory Example
What is psychology?
- Psychology is defined in most textbooks as the scientific study of human behavior and mental processes.
- Behavior = observable actions we can see with our eyes.
- Mental processes = the person’s subjective experiences, such as feelings, emotions, memories, thoughts, and related inner experiences.
- When we say psychology is the scientific study of these two areas, we mean it is an empirical discipline.
- Empirical discipline = conclusions are based on concrete evidence, not personal beliefs.
- In psychology, subjective claims like “I think X,” “I believe Y,” or “I feel Z” are not sufficient for conclusions; evidence-based reasoning is required.
- Data come from systematic observations and data collection, which are then used to form conclusions about how people think and behave.
- The data-driven mindset is summarized by the idea of keeping your eyeballs on the data.
- The empirical method is not perfect and can lead to mistakes, but it is generally far better than making up conclusions without data.
The two core components: behavior and mental processes
- Behavior: observable actions by which we can measure and study individuals.
- Mental processes: internal experiences like thoughts, memories, feelings, and emotions that are not directly observable.
- Psychology studies both normative and abnormal aspects of these components (see below).
The empirical method and why it matters
- Psychology is empirical: relies on observable data and evidence to draw conclusions.
- Data collection methods include systematic observations and other evidence-gathering techniques.
- Conclusions are restricted to what the data support; psychologists avoid overgeneralization beyond the data.
- Everyday intuition or personal belief is not sufficient in scientific psychology.
- The phrase "keep your eyeballs on the data" emphasizes staying close to the evidence.
Limitations and realities of empirical psychology
- The empirical method is not infallible; mistakes can happen.
- Despite limitations, empirical work is preferable to speculation or untested beliefs.
- Acknowledges the possibility of error, which motivates careful design, replication, and scrutiny in research.
Normative vs abnormal psychology
- Psychology covers both normative (normal) and abnormal (non-normal) aspects of the mind and behavior.
- Normative psychology = study of behaviors and mental processes that most humans do on a fairly regular basis.
- Abnormal psychology = study of things that are out of the ordinary and experienced by a small portion of people.
- Abnormal is defined in part by statistical rarity (out of the ordinary) rather than moral judgment alone.
Memory as an illustrative example
- A memory study could focus on normative memory or abnormal memory:
- Abnormal memory: examples include severe memory impairment or amnesia, which is forgetting due to brain injury.
- Amnesia example: forgetting that occurs after brain injury; amnesia is not common in the general population.
- Normative memory: understanding how memory works in the general population, such as how many words an average person can remember.
- This illustrates how the same cognitive domain (memory) can be studied from two complementary angles: how it normally operates in most people and how it can go awry in abnormal cases.
Amnesia and its significance
- Amnesia is a form of forgetting caused by brain injury.
- It represents an abnormal aspect of memory, illustrating how psychology distinguishes between typical and atypical functioning.
Normative memory example broadened
- Normative memory research helps establish baseline expectations about memory performance in the general population.
- It provides a comparative framework for identifying deviations or impairments and for understanding normal cognitive aging, education, and memory strategies.
Practical, ethical, and philosophical implications
- Empiricism in psychology emphasizes evidence over belief, supporting evidence-based practice and research.
- Relying on data helps avoid unfounded claims and improves the reliability and reproducibility of findings.
- A broader scope (normative and abnormal) promotes a nuanced view of human cognition, not just clinical pathology.
- Defining abnormality via statistical rarity has practical implications for diagnosis, treatment considerations, and stigma; researchers must be mindful of how these labels affect people.
- The distinction between normal and abnormal memory has real-world relevance for education, clinical assessment, and cognitive rehabilitation strategies.
Connections to foundational principles
- Empiricism: knowledge comes from systematic observation and data collection.
- Objectivity: conclusions should be based on facts, not personal opinions.
- Measurement and data-driven reasoning: essential for forming reliable theories about behavior and mental processes.
- The balance between studying typical functioning and pathological deviations informs a comprehensive understanding of psychology.
Where this leads next
- A break is coming, and the next video will cover the history of psychology.
- We will discuss important historical figures and the shifts in thinking they brought about.
- This historical perspective helps explain why psychology is defined and studied the way it is today.
Quick recap of key terms
- Psychology: scientific study of human behavior and mental processes.
- Behavior: observable actions.
- Mental processes: internal experiences (feelings, memories, thoughts).
- Empirical discipline: knowledge derived from data and evidence.
- Normative psychology: study of typical human functioning.
- Abnormal psychology: study of atypical functioning (e.g., amnesia).
- Amnesia: memory impairment due to brain injury.
- Eyeballs on the data: emphasis on data-driven conclusions.
(Note: The transcript does not provide explicit numerical values, statistics, or formulas. All concepts reflect the ideas discussed in the material.)