Propaganda and hate

Got it — I’ll rebuild the notes from scratch, tightly integrating both the lecture captions (what the lecturer actually said) and the PowerPoint content, with clear structure, explanations, and linked evidence.


🧠 SCIENCE OF BIAS — ULTRA-DETAILED LECTURE NOTES

Topic: Propaganda, Hate Speech & Explicit Bias


1. 📌 Lecture Overview (from recording + slides)

Structure of the lecture

  • Part 1 (before break):

    • Blatant dehumanisation

    • Propaganda (especially social media)

    • Explicit bias (racism, sexism, ageism)

  • Part 2 (after break):

    • Institutional bias (case study: UCL)

👉 The lecturer explicitly frames this as:

  • Moving from individual-level bias (explicit attitudes)

  • → to system-level bias (institutions)


2. 🚫 Blatant Dehumanisation

2.1 Core Definition

  • Dehumanisation = withholding social cognition from others
    → Not thinking about their:

    • thoughts

    • emotions

    • intentions

From lecture explanation:

  • It means “not getting inside people’s minds”

  • You stop treating them as psychological agents


2.2 Why is dehumanisation important?

Theoretical link to extreme harm

Used to explain:

  • Genocide (e.g., Rwanda, Nazi Germany)

  • Torture (e.g., Abu Ghraib)

  • Slavery & human trafficking

BUT:

Key critical point from lecture:

  • We have NO causal experimental evidence

  • Because these behaviours are unethical to study directly


2.3 Functions of Dehumanisation

🧠 1. Facilitates harmful behaviour

  • Removes emotional barriers (e.g., guilt)

  • Allows actions you normally wouldn’t do

👉 Mechanism:

  • You don’t feel bad harming someone if you don’t see them as fully human

📌 Linked concept:

  • Moral disengagement (Bandura, 1999)


🧠 2. Emotion regulation (proactive)

From lecture:

  • Dehumanisation “short-circuits empathy”

Empathy requires:

  1. Cognitive empathy → understanding others’ feelings

  2. Affective empathy → feeling those emotions

Dehumanisation blocks Step 1
→ therefore stops empathy entirely


🧠 3. Post-hoc justification

  • Happens after harm has already occurred

Example (from lecture):

  • When reminded of violence against Native Americans:

    • Participants dehumanised them more

    • → reduces guilt about historical wrongdoing

👉 Function:

  • Maintains moral self-image

  • Justifies past violence


2.4 Role of Context (IMPORTANT)

Dehumanisation is NOT always causal

Study insight:

  • More influential when:

    • harm is indirect / unseen

  • Less relevant when:

    • harm is intentional and direct

👉 Key conclusion:

  • Dehumanisation may:

    • sustain violence

    • justify it

    • but not always cause it


2.5 Measuring Dehumanisation

“Ascent of Man” scale

  • Participants rate how “evolved” groups are

  • Uses evolutionary progression imagery

Key insight:

  • People are surprisingly willing to:

    • explicitly rate groups as less evolved


2.6 Dehumanisation & Threat

  • Increases after terror attacks

Example:

  • Americans showed spikes in dehumanisation of Muslims after attacks

👉 Interpretation:

  • Dehumanisation = response to threat


2.7 Real-World Impact (Legal Decision Study)

Study: Media language & death penalty

  • Source: Philadelphia Inquirer (20 years of data)

  • Analysed:

    • 788 articles

    • use of animalistic words (e.g., ape, gorilla)

Findings:

  • Black defendants:

    • more dehumanising language

    • more likely to be sentenced to death

👉 Important:

  • Correlational, BUT:

    • shows real-world consequences of bias


3. 📢 Propaganda


3.1 What is Propaganda?

  • Communication designed to:

    • influence attitudes

    • often using emotion + bias

Includes:

  • Hate speech

  • Political messaging

  • Media framing


3.2 Why propaganda spreads (KEY CONCEPT)

Social media business model (from lecture)

Social media companies:

  • Make money from attention

Process:

  1. Content generates engagement (likes, shares)

  2. Algorithms learn:

    • what gets engagement = emotion

  3. Recommender systems:

    • promote emotional content

👉 Result:

  • Emotional + extreme content spreads faster

  • Propaganda becomes viral


🔥 Critical insight:

  • Not necessarily “evil actors”

  • Often system design → bias amplification


3.3 Structure of Propaganda

From lecture + experiment:

Most common themes:

Theme

Frequency

Direct threat

Highest

Past atrocities

High

Victimisation

High

Stereotypes

High

Dehumanisation

LOWER

👉 Key takeaway:

  • Threat is the dominant driver

  • Dehumanisation is only one component


3.4 Experimental Study (Yugoslavia propaganda)

Method:

  • Real speeches from Serbian propagandist

  • Converted into fictional groups

  • Participants rated:

    • violence justification

    • empathy

    • intent


3.5 Key Findings

🔥 Violence justification:

  • Driven by:

    • past atrocities

    • revenge

  • NOT dehumanisation


Empathy for outgroup:

  • Strongly reduced by:

    • dehumanisation (BIGGEST effect)

    • threat

    • revenge


🧠 Mental state attribution:

  • Dehumanisation reduces:

    • perceived intent

    • perceived mind


😡 Emotion (EMG study):

  • Revenge → disgust response

  • Dehumanisation → NO strong disgust response


3.6 Overall conclusion on propaganda

👉 From lecture:

  • Dehumanisation is NOT the main driver

  • Propaganda works through:

    • threat

    • emotion

    • narratives

    • identity


4. Explicit Bias

Definition

  • Bias that is:

    • conscious

    • reportable

    • intentional

👉 People are aware of their attitudes
👉 They can directly report them


5. 🧑🏿‍🤝‍🧑🏼 Racism (Explicit)

5.1 Symbolic Racism

Key idea:

  • Not overt hatred

  • Instead:

    • subtle endorsement of stereotypes


Example items:

  • “Black people no longer face discrimination”

  • “Failure is due to lack of effort”

  • “They demand too much too fast”


Mechanism:

  • Blames individuals

  • Ignores structural inequality


5.2 Individualism Scale

Measures belief that:

  • outcomes are due to personal responsibility

Findings:

  • Predicts:

    • policy attitudes

    • discrimination beliefs

  • Stronger predictor than:

    • political ideology

    • general prejudice


6. 👩 Sexism

6.1 Ambivalent Sexism Theory

Two components:


🔴 Hostile sexism

  • Overt negativity

  • Example:

    • “Women are too easily offended”


🟢 Benevolent sexism

  • Appears positive BUT is harmful

  • Example:

    • “Women should be protected”

    • “A good woman should be adored”

👉 Reinforces:

  • dependence

  • traditional roles


Key insight:

  • Bias can be:

    • negative OR “positive”

  • Both maintain inequality


7. 👵 Ageism

7.1 Core stereotypes

1. Succession

  • Older people blocking opportunities

2. Consumption

  • Using too many resources

3. Identity

  • Acting “too young”


7.2 Key insight from lecture

  • Ageism is context-dependent

  • Can go both directions:

    • young → old

    • old → young

👉 But research mainly focuses on:

  • young people’s bias toward older people


8. 🏛 Institutional Bias (Intro)

Key shift in lecture:

  • From individuals → systems


8.1 Key finding

  • Diversity initiatives often:

    • do NOT increase diversity

    • sometimes backfire


8.2 Why they persist

  • Serve as:

    • legal protection

    • signal of fairness

Judges:

  • treat presence of diversity policies as proof of non-discrimination


8.3 Core problem

👉 From lecture:

  • Systems (not just people) produce bias


9. 🎓 UCL Case Study — BME Awarding Gap

Causes identified:

👤 Person-level:

  • Lack of belonging

  • Isolation

  • Social mismatch


🏫 Situation-level:

  • Lack of diversity

  • Weak community

  • Physical separation

  • Racial bias (students + staff)


Key social psychology principle:

  • Behaviour = Person + Situation


🔥 FINAL SYNTHESIS (VERY IMPORTANT)

3 BIG IDEAS from the lecture:

1. Dehumanisation is NOT the whole story

  • Important for:

    • empathy reduction

  • BUT:

    • threat + narratives drive behaviour more


2. Propaganda is SYSTEM-DRIVEN

  • Social media amplifies:

    • emotion

    • outrage

  • Due to:

    • profit model


3. Bias exists at MULTIPLE LEVELS

  • Individual (explicit bias)

  • Cognitive (dehumanisation)

  • Systemic (institutions)


If you want, I can next:

  • turn this into exam essays

  • make flashcards

  • or create a perfect 1st-class policy paper plan based on this lecture

Here are high-quality MCQs based directly on your lecture (captions + slides), designed to match exam style and test both knowledge + understanding + application.


🧠 MCQs — Propaganda, Hate Speech & Explicit Bias


🧩 SECTION 1: Dehumanisation

Q1. What is the best definition of dehumanisation?

A. Treating others as inferior based on group membership
B. Withholding social cognition from others
C. Expressing explicit dislike toward another group
D. Ignoring cultural differences

Answer: B
Dehumanisation = not attributing thoughts, feelings, or minds to others.


Q2. According to the lecture, why is there limited causal evidence linking dehumanisation to violence?

A. It is not strongly related to violence
B. It is difficult to measure
C. It is unethical to experimentally study extreme violence
D. People do not report it accurately

Answer: C
Ethical constraints prevent direct experimental testing.


Q3. Which of the following is a key function of dehumanisation?

A. Increasing empathy
B. Enhancing moral awareness
C. Facilitating harmful behaviour by reducing guilt
D. Improving intergroup understanding

Answer: C


Q4. How does dehumanisation affect empathy?

A. It enhances emotional empathy
B. It blocks cognitive empathy, preventing emotional empathy
C. It only affects affective empathy
D. It has no effect on empathy

Answer: B
It stops mental state attribution → empathy cascade fails.


Q5. In which situation is dehumanisation MOST likely to have an effect?

A. When harm is intentional and direct
B. When harm is visible
C. When harm is indirect or victims are unseen
D. When people are highly empathetic

Answer: C


Q6. What does the “Ascent of Man” scale measure?

A. Implicit bias
B. Emotional reactions to groups
C. Explicit beliefs about how “evolved” groups are
D. Cultural intelligence

Answer: C


Q7. After a terrorist attack, what typically happens to dehumanisation levels?

A. They decrease
B. They remain stable
C. They increase toward the perceived threatening group
D. They only increase for ingroups

Answer: C


Q8. In the legal decision-making study, what predicted harsher outcomes (e.g., death penalty)?

A. Political ideology
B. Media use of dehumanising language
C. Defendant age
D. Jury size

Answer: B


📢 SECTION 2: Propaganda


Q9. What is the primary driver of engagement on social media platforms?

A. Accuracy of information
B. Logical reasoning
C. Emotional content
D. Length of content

Answer: C


Q10. Why does propaganda spread easily on social media?

A. Governments promote it directly
B. Algorithms prioritise emotional, engaging content
C. Users prefer neutral information
D. It is always factually correct

Answer: B


Q11. According to the lecture, what is the MAIN theme in effective propaganda?

A. Dehumanisation
B. Neutral reporting
C. Direct threat
D. Humor

Answer: C


Q12. In the propaganda experiment, which factor BEST predicted justification of violence?

A. Dehumanisation
B. Past atrocities
C. Empathy
D. Political ideology

Answer: B


Q13. What is the strongest effect of dehumanisation in propaganda?

A. Increasing disgust
B. Increasing nationalism
C. Reducing empathy for the outgroup
D. Increasing factual understanding

Answer: C


Q14. What did the EMG (facial muscle) study show?

A. Dehumanisation increases disgust responses
B. Revenge increases disgust responses more than dehumanisation
C. No emotional responses were detected
D. Dehumanisation increases happiness

Answer: B


Q15. What is a key conclusion about propaganda mechanisms?

A. Dehumanisation is the only important factor
B. Threat, emotion, and narratives are more central
C. Rational arguments are most effective
D. People ignore propaganda

Answer: B


SECTION 3: Explicit Bias


Q16. What defines explicit bias?

A. Unconscious attitudes
B. Automatic associations
C. Conscious, reportable attitudes
D. Neural responses

Answer: C


🧑🏿‍🤝‍🧑🏼 Racism


Q17. What is symbolic racism?

A. Open hostility toward minorities
B. Subtle endorsement of stereotypes and denial of discrimination
C. Biological racism
D. Implicit bias

Answer: B


Q18. Which statement reflects symbolic racism?

A. “I dislike all outgroups”
B. “Discrimination no longer exists”
C. “Everyone is equal”
D. “Culture is important”

Answer: B


Q19. What does the individualism scale measure?

A. Emotional prejudice
B. Belief that individuals are responsible for their outcomes
C. Group identity strength
D. Social dominance

Answer: B


Q20. What does research show about individualism beliefs?

A. They are unrelated to policy attitudes
B. They strongly predict policy preferences
C. They only affect emotions
D. They reduce prejudice

Answer: B


👩 SECTION 4: Sexism


Q21. What are the two components of ambivalent sexism?

A. Implicit and explicit
B. Cognitive and emotional
C. Hostile and benevolent
D. Individual and structural

Answer: C


Q22. What is hostile sexism?

A. Protective attitudes toward women
B. Overtly negative attitudes toward women
C. Subtle bias
D. Gender neutrality

Answer: B


Q23. What is benevolent sexism?

A. Equality-based attitudes
B. Positive attitudes that reinforce traditional gender roles
C. Lack of bias
D. Implicit bias

Answer: B


Q24. Why is benevolent sexism problematic?

A. It is always negative
B. It reinforces inequality despite appearing positive
C. It has no impact
D. It only affects men

Answer: B


👵 SECTION 5: Ageism


Q25. What does “succession” refer to in ageism?

A. Emotional decline
B. Older people blocking opportunities for younger people
C. Memory loss
D. Health issues

Answer: B


Q26. What does “consumption” refer to?

A. Learning ability
B. Resource use by older people
C. Cultural differences
D. Emotional sensitivity

Answer: B


Q27. What does “identity” refer to in ageism?

A. Political beliefs
B. Older people acting outside expected age roles
C. Personality traits
D. Economic status

Answer: B


🏛 SECTION 6: Institutional Bias


Q28. What is a key finding about diversity initiatives?

A. They always improve diversity
B. They often have little or no effect
C. They eliminate bias completely
D. They reduce productivity

Answer: B


Q29. Why do organisations still use diversity initiatives?

A. They are always effective
B. They increase profits directly
C. They signal fairness and reduce legal risk
D. Employees demand them

Answer: C


Q30. What is the key principle explaining institutional bias?

A. Bias is purely individual
B. Systems and structures produce bias
C. Only attitudes matter
D. Bias is random

Answer: B


🎓 SECTION 7: UCL Case Study


Q31. What factor contributed to the BME awarding gap?

A. Intelligence differences
B. Lack of belonging and isolation
C. Curriculum difficulty
D. Assessment format

Answer: B


Q32. Which concept explains the case study findings?

A. Cognitive dissonance
B. Person–situation interaction
C. Classical conditioning
D. Social learning theory

Answer: B


🔥 Want more?

I can also:

  • turn these into a timed mock exam

  • create harder application MCQs (1st-class level)

  • or generate essay questions + model answers

Just tell me 👍