Unit 1 CoGo Concepts
Democratic vs Authoritarian states
Democratic - power in the people
Criteria
Rule of law
Less state interference in media/daily life
Free and fair elections
More government transparency
More citizen participation (voting and interest groups)
Branches of government
Independent branches (executive, judicial, legislative)
Decentralized power allows for independent authority
Increases accountability of government
AP 6
UK
Mexico (present)
Nigeria (present)
Authoritarian - power invested in small number/group of individuals, exercise power over state
without being held responsible to people
Criteria
Rule by law
High state control in media/daily life
Controlled/Rigged elections
Less government transparency
Limited citizen participation
Branches of government are very intertwined
Types of authoritarian regimes
Illiberal/hybrid democracy (Russia)
One-party states (China)
Theocracy (Iran)
Totalitarian - control over public and private lives
Military - country run by military leaders (Nigeria in the past)
AP 6
Iran
China
Russia (illiberal democracy)
Mexico (under PRI rule)
Nigeria (under
Democratization
Democratization - transition from authoritarian regime to democratic regime
Aims to accomplish
More competition
More transparency in gov/elections
Increase citizen participation in policy making process
Extending universal suffrage
Increased protection of civil rights/liberties, equality
Establishing rule of law
Democratic consolidation
Maturation of a democracy where it becomes unlikely that a country reverts to authoritarianism unless there is a “shock” or extenuating circumstance
Seen in UK and Mexico (debated)
Factors that hinder democratization
Political corruption
High rates in Nigeria, Mexico
Election rules that restrict voting
Limiting civil liberties
Polarization of political groups
Based on religious, economic, ethnic, etc factors
Factors that help democratization
Accommodating ethnic diversity in electoral systems
Eg Nigeria - accommodating the diversity in the country by having different ethnic groups represented
Increased multi-party competition/rule changes (ie gender quotas, prop rep)
Eg Mexico - gender quota in parliament
Independent judiciary
Policies that protect civil rights/liberties
Separation of powers
Consensus among political groups
Sources of power/authority
Power: ability to control or direct others
Authority: right to control or direct others
With authority, use of power is justified (seen with increased legitimacy)
Accepted/legitimate power
Sources
Constitution (UK - not in writing (bc no physical constitution) but in practice)
Religion (Iran)
Military/Force (China, Russia, Iran)
Political parties (China - CCP has the most power)
Legislature (Mexico - after implementing rules against 1-party dominance, the legislature is seen as a lot more legitimate)
Popular support (Iran after Islamic revolution)
Election rules/elections
Federal vs Unitary systems
Federal - Power divided among different levels of government (sub-national or regional governments). Devolved power is constitutionally protected
Russia, Mexico, Nigeria
Not all federal states are democratic
Adv
Citizen participation in multiple levels of government
Responsive nature of government to regional needs
Less likely to have 1-party dominance
Dis
Possibly very inefficient
Difficult to understand for citizens
Conflict between levels of government
Asymmetric federalism
Central gov takes steps to take away power from regional governments
Eg Russia - lots of power stripped from regional governments (ie ability to choose governors)
Unitary - All power in central government. Can have regional governments but they don’t necessarily have any power
UK, China, Iran
Adv
Consistent laws throughout country
Easier to understand
Gov can act quickly when needed
Dis
Ignoring regional issues
Easier to have 1 party dominance
Regional governments have no power
Devolved unitary systems
When central gov gives power to regional governments *regional governments don’t have permanent power, can be taken back at any moment
Eg UK (devolved power to Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland)
Factors to change relationship between central and regional governments
Ethnic/Religious divides
Supranational organizations
External threats
Usually leads to power shifted to central
Regional protesters/discontent
Usually central → regional
National emergency/crisis (ie terrorism)
Can go both ways