Mock Trial Fall 2025 Case Notes
Overview of Case
Charlie Martin is indicted for criminal homicide for causing the death of fellow contestant Rob Armstrong during the filming of a reality TV show Saboteurs.
Charlie Martin has entered a plea of not guilty.
The case is set for a jury trial in the Charlotte County District Court.
Exhibit 1: Rules of the Show
Structure of the show:
20 people meet in a different location each season; locations could be anywhere.
Patrons: nobles/innocent contestants.
Saboteurs: insiders with insider information.
Saboteurs get insider information on the challenges in advance.
People who are not saboteurs may sabotage others if they want.
Cast composition:
17 patrons (nobles).
3 saboteurs.
Elimination mechanics:
Contestants can be eliminated by being voted off by other contestants or by failing a challenge/finishing last.
Final stage:
The game comes down to the final 5 contestants.
In the final 5, one contestant is eliminated and one is voted off (as described in the transcript).
Prize rules:
If all 3 saboteurs are among the final contestants? The transcript states: If any saboteurs are in the 3, they only get the prize (implying saboteur success overrides the nobles in the final prize allocation).
Prize pool is dollars.
Saboteur mechanics and deception:
Saboteurs may formally agree to sabotage one person only.
They then choose a primary saboteur for that challenge, and all other saboteurs leave.
The selected saboteur meets with production to get insight on the challenge.
The target of sabotage is not revealed before the challenge is played.
Immunity and elimination dynamics:
The patron who performs best in a given phase earns immunity.
One patron is additionally voted off (i.e., carries an elimination risk beyond the challenge-based elimination).
Contingency rule:
Additional rule: If the show ends before the winners are announced, the remaining players split the prize equally regardless of status.
Exhibit 2: Chart Summary
Description:
Chart listing:
Which contestants are patrons/saboteurs.
Which contestants hold immunity at various points.
Which contestants are voted off at different stages.
Exhibit 3: Autopsy Report
Medical History:
Subject: 34-year-old male.
General condition: excellent.
Mild cat allergy (allergic rhinitis)
Heightened physical ability, corroborated by contestants.
Appendectomy performed at age 12.
External Examination:
CPR-related bruising on the chest.
Chemical burns around lips and nose.
Mild cyanosis (discoloration) in fingernails and lips.
Oral Cavity/Mouth:
Bruising observed within the mouth region.
Signs of cat allergy symptoms (mucus)
Respritory:
Lungs were waterlogged; frothy fluid > consistent with drowning.
Small bleeds (Petechial hemorrhages) in eyes (conjunctiva) and lung lining (pleura).
BUT: Chemical irritation (redness, rawness) in windpipe (trachea) and larger breathing tubes (bronchi).
Not typical for just drowning.
Suggests the possibility of an inhaled chemical
Cardiovascular system:
Normal with slight right sided strain, mild physiological stress
CNS:
Brain was mildly swollen, no air (hypoxia), oxygen deprivation prior to death
No signs of head trauma or injury
Gastrointestinal:
No abnormalities, partially digested meal consumed 2-3 hours before death
Renal:
Kidneys normal, outer section (cortical) is pale > acute metabolic stress
Tissue samples taken for histological examination
Other systems: normal
Cause of Death:
Loss of breath (Asphyxia) from drowning. Toxicology results show inhalation of oxalic acid (found in cleaning agents like bleach)
Oxalic acid poisioning lead to hypoxia > disorientation/drowning
Exhibit 4: Toxicological Analysis
Basic Blood panel findings (abnormalities):
Serum Calcium: critically low (hypocalemia)
pH: 7.08 (metabolic acidosis - low blood ph)
Electrolytes, blood glucose, creatinine - normal
Microscopy: Kidney tissue tested, Hematoxylin & Eosin - No overt pathology
Kidney tissue examined under a miscroscope using special stains
Calcium oxalate crystals, shaped like fans and rosettes, were found broadly distributed across the outer tissue of both kidneys.
Interpretations:
These findings suggest that acute oxalate poisoning > likely inhalation in aerosolized (consolidated spray) or vaporized form
Lung damage and drowning > incapacitation or disorientation leading to submersion
Advanced Toxicology: blood re-tested
Oxalic acid (serum): 3.5x upper reference limit
Ethylene Glycol, (used in antifreeze) cyanide, heavy metals, Salicylates/Acetaminophen (pain relievers) > all none/negative
Tissue Distribution of Oxalic Acid: kidney tissue, tracheal (throat airway) tissue, bronchial (lung) tissue, oral swabs
Tissue Sample | Oxalic Acid Concentration | Reference Range |
|---|---|---|
Oral mucosa | 55.455.4 | <55 |
Trachea | 48.948.9 | <55 |
Bronchi | 42.142.1 | <55 |
Kidney (avg. of 1010 samples) | 30.330.3 | <55 |
Interpretation:
High concentration consistent with recent and decent exposure
Distribution suggets exposure via upper airway during a concious state
Exhibit 5: Footage Review of Dive Challenge
Challenge Description:
Swim to the bottom of a 25-30 foot lagoon > untie 5 metal rings
All had a small mask and oxygen tank with 30 minutes of air
Footage review notes:
00:00–03:00: Rob Armstrong enters the water, coughs after a test breath, switches masks, then descends and easily unties the first ring.
03:00–04:30: Easily unties the second and third rings.
04:30–05:30: Pace slows, movements become less fluid, delay at the fourth anchor.
05:30–08:00: Fmbles the knot at the fourth anchor, appears disorientated, erratic breathing
08:00–10:00: Leaves the fourth anchor without untying it, ascends and descends erratically, heads towards the fifth anchor without clear purpose.
10:00–12:00: He drifts, attempts to ascend unsuccessfully, his eyes are wide and unfocused, and his body tilts, indicating disorientation.
12:00–14:30: He attempts a rapid ascent, stops, descends erratically, and tugs at his mask and regulator while shaking his head.
14:30–15:00: He yanks off his mask, inhales water, begins convulsing, his limbs flail, and his eyes close.
15:30–16:00: Emergency protocol is initiated, divers retrieve him, and administer rescue breaths.
Exhibit 6: Interview with Riley Kaye
Key Points:
Riley Kaye was heavily involved in the production of the show and had a long history with the show
After finishing a bachelors in film and television:
Started as an intern on "The Saboteurs" premiere season.
After Season 1: Performed editing work and served as the showrunner's personal assistant.
Season 2: Production assistant
Further promoted to Associate Producer.
Season 7: Promoted to Supervising Producer, responsible for talent recruitment and maintenance.
Season 10: Story Producer
She was responsbile for giving them the options of who to sabotage
She ultimately adminsistered the sabotage herself
“Did any of the players push back on the options you presented?” > “Im not comfortable answering that”
“Ok, did you ever change the options of the planned sabotage after the target was selected?” > “I’m sure that has happened in the 10-year history of the show.”