Chapter8
Chapter Overview
Title: Contemporary Canadian Business Law Principles & Cases
Authors: John A. Willes, John H. Willes, Carol A. Willes, Frances M. Willes
Edition: Thirteenth Edition (2024)
Chapter Objectives
Understand mutual benefit in contracts.
Define consideration as a representation of this mutuality.
Recognize exceptions to the consideration requirement.
Explain the role of estoppel in the case of gratuitous promises.
Consideration in Contracts
Definition: Consideration is something valuable in the eyes of the law that a promisor receives in exchange for a promise.
Example: "I will do this if you do that."
Essential for a contract to be binding.
Forms of Consideration
Types of consideration include:
Money
Services
Promises not to act (forbearance)
Giving up a right
Delivery of property
Reciprocal promises (promise for a promise)
Gratuitous Promises
Definition: A promise made without consideration, thus non-enforceable under law.
A gratuitous promise lacks legal value if no exchange occurs.
Exceptions to the Consideration Rule
Gratuitous Services: Must be performed with care if accepted.
Negotiable Instruments: Promissory notes can bind individuals even without prior consideration.
Charitable Donations: May be enforceable if a specific project is based on the pledge.
Adequacy of Consideration
Courts generally do not assess the adequacy of consideration.
Value agreed upon is a matter between parties, not judges.
A record of intentions can strengthen enforceability of promises.
A minor token may suffice to form a binding agreement.
Seal as Consideration
A seal indicates a commitment to a written promise or agreement.
Affixing a seal can negate the need for additional consideration.
Traditionally involved wax seals, now considered in digital contexts (e.g., electronic signatures).
The Click as Consideration
Current legal interpretations are assessing whether a mouse click serves as consideration.
Potential for courts to validate this as an equivalent of a traditional seal.
Past Consideration
Definition: Past consideration is not valid; must be present or future consideration.
Previous benefits or payments received do not qualify as consideration for new promises under the law.
Nature of Consideration Required
Consideration must be legal.
Cannot involve illegal acts or violate public policy.
Contracts are void if they violate applicable statutes.
Tenders
Distinction between an offer and tenders.
Tenders invite proposals but do not bind the seller to accept any offers.
Can withdraw tenders prior to acceptance if no firm commitment is made.
Quantum Meruit
Definition: A remedy to recover costs for services/materials requested without a specified price.
Often invoked in services where no price has been agreed upon prior to service delivery.
Debtor-Creditor Relationship
Debt is satisfied when the payment is made in full.
Any agreement to accept less than what’s owed is typically a gratuitous promise and not enforceable.
New consideration is required for a modified promise.
Exceptions under Law
Offers regarding less than full payment can be validated under specific cases, including:
Signed written agreements under seal
Acceptance of non-money compensation
Parts of common law and equity reflecting flexible approaches toward consideration.
Estoppel
Definition: Prevents a person from retracting a promise if another party has relied on it.
Enforceable even without consideration in certain circumstances.
Key factors for establishing estoppel:
Intention for promise to affect the relationship
Reliance by the other party leading to a change in position.
Checklist for Considerable Contracts
Evaluate:
Is consideration present?
Is it legal under the law?
Is mutual consideration existing in both directions?
If any requirements fail, consider exceptions (e.g., seal, donations).
Summary
Consideration is crucial in contracts; gratuitous promises need formal backing (written/sealed) to be enforceable.
Legal value must exist, but the actual value is not strictly quantified.
Courts often determine reasonable price where consideration is unclear.
Estoppel serves as a defense in instances of reliance on non-binding promises.