PHL01-CO2 Notes

PRIORI VS POSTERIORI

  • A priori knowledge:
    • Prior to sense experience.
    • Can be deduced through thinking, even without real-world experiments.
    • Known prior to any reference to the physical world or our five senses.
    • Example: 2+2=42 + 2 = 4
  • A posteriori knowledge:
    • Gained only after sense experience has occurred.
    • Requires going out into the world and using our five senses to experiment and find out the 'facts'.
    • Example: The Titanic sinking on April 15, 1912; the composition of water as two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen.

Truth and Knowledge

  • Truth:
    • A fact that has been verified.
    • Lies at the heart of any inquiry.
  • Knowledge:
    • Simple data from the outside that passes to our senses.
    • Must be truthful to gain validity and acceptance.

Theories of Truth

  • Correspondence Theory
  • Coherence Theory
  • Pragmatic Theory
  • Constructivist Theory
  • Consensus Theory

CORRESPONDENCE THEORY

  • A statement is true if it corresponds to an object in reality.
  • Example: A dog barks.

COHERENCE THEORY

  • A statement is true if it is complementary or coherent to other's beliefs.
  • Example: "God created the world" is true for Catholics and other religions but false for atheists.

PRAGMATIC THEORY

  • A statement is true if it is beneficial depending on our perspective.
  • Example: "Mapúa is a good university"
    • True because of ABET accreditation.
    • True because of high passing rates in board exams.

CONSTRUCTIVIST THEORY

  • A statement is true if it is a social norm.
  • Example: Young people should respect the elderly.

CONSENSUS THEORY

  • A statement is true if there is an agreement that something is really true.
  • Example: Scientists agreed that light is a particle.

Propositions

  • Philosophers consider truth as a kind of quality or value.
  • Propositions are statements about the world or reality which may or may not carry truth.

What is TRUTH and why is it important?

  • Knowledge is the clear awareness and understanding of something. It is the product of questions that allow for clear answers provided by facts.
  • What we know is what is observable or evident in the real world.
  • Propositions which are observed to be real or truthful are considered facts.
  • Claims require further examination to establish whether they are true or false.

How can Philosophy guide us in determining truth and opinion?

  • Opinions are comprised of statements which not only give facts but also provide conclusions or perspectives regarding certain situations. They may advance a belief about certain things or provide explanations.
  • Opinions are also the bases for making arguments and convincing people that a certain claim is a fact. They are often influenced by bias.
  • Beliefs are statements that express convictions that are not easily and clearly explained by facts. To judge the truthfulness of a belief, we must also consider things such as the person’s experiences and views.
  • Explanations are statements that assume the claim to be true and provide reasons why the statement is true.

Fallacies

  • Fallacies are common errors in reasoning that will undermine the logic of your argument.
  • Fallacies can be either illegitimate arguments or irrelevant points and are often identified because they lack evidence that supports their claim.
  • Avoid these common fallacies in your own arguments and watch for them in the arguments of others.

Argumentum Ad Hominem/Personal Attack

  • Attacking the person instead of the argument itself.

Ad Baculum/Appeal to Force

  • Using the threat or force or undesirable event to advance an argument.

Ad Misericordiam/Appeal to Pity

  • Using emotions such as pity and sympathy to advance an argument.

Ad Populum/Appeal to Majority/Bandwagon

  • The idea is presented as acceptable because a lot of people accept it.

Ad Antiquitatem/Appeal to Tradition

  • The idea is acceptable because it has been true for a long time.

Ad Verecundiam

  • Misusing an authority in an argument.

Dicto Simpliciter

  • Argument based on an unqualified generalization.

Fallacy of Composition

  • Assuming that what is true of a part is true for the whole.

Fallacy of Division

  • Assuming that what is true for the whole is true for its parts.

Hasty Generalization

  • The generalization is reached too hastily. There are too few instances or evidences to support such conclusion.

Petitio Principii (Begging the Question)

  • Assuming that the thing or idea to be proven is true. Also known as circular reasoning.

Red Herring

  • Attempting to redirect the argument to another issue to which the person doing the redirecting can better respond.

Biases

  • Biases are tendencies to prefer one thing over the other. Sometimes biases also affect our way of thinking about a particular situation.

Correspondence Bias

  • Tendency to judge a person’s personality by his/her actions without regard for external factors or situations.

Confirmation Bias

  • Tendency to look for and accept information in a way that confirms one’s own beliefs and reject ideas that go against it.

Conflict of Interest

  • A person or group is connected to or has a vested interest in the issue.

Cultural Bias

  • Analyzing an event or issue based on one's cultural standards.

Framing

  • Focusing on a certain aspect of a problem while ignoring other aspects.

Hindsight (Knew-it-all-along Phenomenon)

  • Is when, after an event occurs, we feel we already knew what was going to happen.