Lecture 13 - Animal Behaviour & Animal Welfare
Understanding Animal Welfare
- Definition & Scope
- Refers to the quality of life an animal experiences; how well the animal is coping with its current situation and surroundings.
- World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE): The physical and mental state of an animal in relation to the conditions in which it lives and dies.
- Encompasses every context in which humans control animals: laboratories, farms, zoos, companion-animal homes, entertainment venues, etc.
- Implies a human duty to treat animals humanely, responsibly, and with respect.
Importance of Animal Welfare
- Sentience
- Science recognises animals as sentient beings—capable of feelings, emotions, perceptions, pleasure, pain, and suffering.
- Sentience = Able to perceive or feel things.
- One Health / One Welfare links
- Poor welfare ➔ increased disease transmission & virulence of zoonoses.
- Example: Transport- or slaughter-stress leads to greater pathogen shedding.
- Moral & societal drivers
- Rising public concern for standards of care and well-being.
- Drives legislation, industry guidelines, certification schemes, and consumer behaviour.
- Illustrative comparison
- Battery-caged laying hens vs. free-range hens: environment determines welfare outcomes (space, behavioural opportunities, health issues).
The Five Freedoms
- Originated in the UK (Brambell Report, ).
- Expanded by the Farm Animal Welfare Council; now globally adopted (veterinary bodies, NGOs, industries).
- Freedom – Hunger & Thirst: access to fresh water and a diet that maintains full health & vigour.
- Freedom – Discomfort: suitable environment, shelter, and comfortable resting area.
- Freedom – Pain, Injury, Disease: prevention or rapid diagnosis + treatment.
- Freedom – Normal Behaviour: sufficient space, proper facilities, and company of the animal’s own kind.
- Freedom – Fear & Distress: conditions and treatment that avoid mental suffering.
- Underpin welfare audits, certification standards, and legislative frameworks.
Animal Welfare & Ethics
- Ethics = critical reflection on how and why we should act.
- Animal ethics specifically addresses how humans ought to treat non-human animals, considering both relationships and direct treatment.
- Most leading ethical theories reject speciesism (unjustified discrimination based on species) and insist the interests of all sentient beings matter.
Ethical Theories
Deontology (Animal-Rights Position)
- Moral focus on duties and rights rather than consequences.
- Aims at abolition of animal use/exploitation in agriculture, entertainment, research, fur industry, etc.—not merely "reform".
- Even "humane" farming or zoos are morally impermissible because they treat animals as resources.
Utilitarianism (Consequentialism)
- Morality demands actions that maximise net happiness for all sentient beings.
- Likely condemns factory farming & certain zoos (high suffering, low benefit).
- Nonetheless allows animal use if doing so yields greater total happiness (e.g.
biomedical research that saves many lives). - Focus: How animals are used, not the mere fact they are used.
Contractarianism
- Morality arises from mutual agreements between people (social contract).
- Animals cannot be contractors, so obligations are indirect—we care because animals matter to humans (economic, emotional, reputational).
- Illustrative statements:
- "We improve welfare because consumers demand it."
- "Avoid using primates in research because the public objects."
- "Better welfare ➔ better research data."
- Commonly invoked in veterinary and agri-business ethics.
Contextual Ethical Questions
- Companion animals: Is pet-keeping morally acceptable? What duties do guardians have?
- Production animals: How should we house/feed animals raised for meat/milk/eggs? Is it ethical to eat them at all?
- Wild animals: Should we intervene to rescue injured wild animals? Is hunting justifiable?
- Research & teaching: Is killing animals for dissection permissible? Should primates be used in biomedical trials?
- Work, sport, display: Is culling "unsuitable" racehorses acceptable? Are zoos permissible?
- Aquatic animals: Should large marine mammals be kept in captivity? Does fish sentience obligate us to change fishing practices?
Indicators & Assessment of Animal Welfare
- Welfare exists on a continuum
- From Optimal (body, mind, and natural behaviour all satisfied) to Minimal (none satisfactory).
- Need for reliable, objective methods ➔ scientific research continually refines indicators & tools.
Four Core Categories of Indicators
- Behavioural
- Choices animals make; presence of abnormal behaviours (stereotypies, feather-pecking, bar-biting, tongue-rolling, weaving, wind-sucking).
- Physical
- Injury (cuts, tail/ear biting), body damage, abscesses, joint swelling, hair/wool loss, body condition.
- Physiological
- Stress hormones (cortisol), altered adrenal activity, immunosuppression, feed-intake changes.
- Production
- Growth rate, body weight, reproduction, milk/meat/egg/wool yields, meat texture.
Key Principle
- Welfare is complex; assess multiple indicators to avoid misleading conclusions.
Three Main Sources of Indicators
The animal itself in its current state (behaviour frequency, hormone levels, body condition).
The animal in a decision-making test (preference testing, cognitive-bias tests).
The environment/situation (diet quality, climate exposure, housing/husbandry details).
Approaches to Welfare Assessment
| Criterion | Naturalistic | Functional | Subjective Experience |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Welfare depends on being able to perform natural behaviours and live naturally. | Welfare relates to normal physiological & behavioural functioning. | Welfare equals the animal’s feelings (pain, pleasure, suffering). |
| Concept | Provide natural environments & behaviours. | Focus on biological function. | Emphasise psychological well-being. |
| Research methods | Field studies; compare wild vs. captive. | Measure growth, productivity, reproduction; epidemiology; pathology; immune suppression. | Operant conditioning; preference tests; stereotypy & conflict behaviour measures. |
| Advantages | Intuitively appeals to public. | Easier to demonstrate scientifically via measurable biology. | Targets the core moral concern—subjective experience. |
| Disadvantages | Idealises nature; ignores adaptability to artificial systems. | Links between function & welfare not always clear; conflicting measures problematic. | Feelings can’t be directly observed; epistemologically difficult. |
Objective vs. Subjective Measurement Continuum
- Objective: Quantify rates, durations, frequencies, hormone concentrations, etc.
- Subjective: Keeper questionnaires, qualitative behaviour assessment, lameness/pain scoring by trained observers.
Selecting Appropriate Indicators
- Welfare aim: e.g. pain prevention vs. encouraging play.
- Timescale: vocalisations (short-term) vs. ulcers (long-term stress).
- Ethical constraints: prefer non-invasive sampling (faecal hormones) over blood draws when feasible.
- Feasibility: budget, time, labour, technical expertise.
Key Takeaways
- Animal welfare blends science (behaviour, physiology), ethics (moral reasoning), and practicality (husbandry, legislation).
- The Five Freedoms remain a cornerstone but are complemented by modern frameworks (e.g. Five Domains, Quality of Life scales).
- Effective assessment utilises multiple indicators across behaviour, body, and productivity, interpreted through an explicit welfare concept (naturalistic, functional, or subjective).
- Ethical theories (deontology, utilitarianism, contractarianism) shape policy debates and personal choices—from lab protocols to dietary habits.
- Because animals are sentient, their interests must be weighed in every human decision that affects them.