Lecture 13 - Animal Behaviour & Animal Welfare

Understanding Animal Welfare

  • Definition & Scope
    • Refers to the quality of life an animal experiences; how well the animal is coping with its current situation and surroundings.
    • World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE): The physical and mental state of an animal in relation to the conditions in which it lives and dies.
    • Encompasses every context in which humans control animals: laboratories, farms, zoos, companion-animal homes, entertainment venues, etc.
    • Implies a human duty to treat animals humanely, responsibly, and with respect.

Importance of Animal Welfare

  • Sentience
    • Science recognises animals as sentient beings—capable of feelings, emotions, perceptions, pleasure, pain, and suffering.
    • Sentience = Able to perceive or feel things.
  • One Health / One Welfare links
    • Poor welfare ➔ increased disease transmission & virulence of zoonoses.
    • Example: Transport- or slaughter-stress leads to greater pathogen shedding.
  • Moral & societal drivers
    • Rising public concern for standards of care and well-being.
    • Drives legislation, industry guidelines, certification schemes, and consumer behaviour.
  • Illustrative comparison
    • Battery-caged laying hens vs. free-range hens: environment determines welfare outcomes (space, behavioural opportunities, health issues).

The Five Freedoms

  • Originated in the UK (Brambell Report, 19651965).
  • Expanded by the Farm Animal Welfare Council; now globally adopted (veterinary bodies, NGOs, industries).
  • Freedom 11 – Hunger & Thirst: access to fresh water and a diet that maintains full health & vigour.
  • Freedom 22 – Discomfort: suitable environment, shelter, and comfortable resting area.
  • Freedom 33 – Pain, Injury, Disease: prevention or rapid diagnosis + treatment.
  • Freedom 44 – Normal Behaviour: sufficient space, proper facilities, and company of the animal’s own kind.
  • Freedom 55 – Fear & Distress: conditions and treatment that avoid mental suffering.
  • Underpin welfare audits, certification standards, and legislative frameworks.

Animal Welfare & Ethics

  • Ethics = critical reflection on how and why we should act.
  • Animal ethics specifically addresses how humans ought to treat non-human animals, considering both relationships and direct treatment.
  • Most leading ethical theories reject speciesism (unjustified discrimination based on species) and insist the interests of all sentient beings matter.

Ethical Theories

Deontology (Animal-Rights Position)

  • Moral focus on duties and rights rather than consequences.
  • Aims at abolition of animal use/exploitation in agriculture, entertainment, research, fur industry, etc.—not merely "reform".
  • Even "humane" farming or zoos are morally impermissible because they treat animals as resources.

Utilitarianism (Consequentialism)

  • Morality demands actions that maximise net happiness for all sentient beings.
  • Likely condemns factory farming & certain zoos (high suffering, low benefit).
  • Nonetheless allows animal use if doing so yields greater total happiness (e.g.
    biomedical research that saves many lives).
  • Focus: How animals are used, not the mere fact they are used.

Contractarianism

  • Morality arises from mutual agreements between people (social contract).
  • Animals cannot be contractors, so obligations are indirect—we care because animals matter to humans (economic, emotional, reputational).
  • Illustrative statements:
    • "We improve welfare because consumers demand it."
    • "Avoid using primates in research because the public objects."
    • "Better welfare ➔ better research data."
  • Commonly invoked in veterinary and agri-business ethics.

Contextual Ethical Questions

  • Companion animals: Is pet-keeping morally acceptable? What duties do guardians have?
  • Production animals: How should we house/feed animals raised for meat/milk/eggs? Is it ethical to eat them at all?
  • Wild animals: Should we intervene to rescue injured wild animals? Is hunting justifiable?
  • Research & teaching: Is killing animals for dissection permissible? Should primates be used in biomedical trials?
  • Work, sport, display: Is culling "unsuitable" racehorses acceptable? Are zoos permissible?
  • Aquatic animals: Should large marine mammals be kept in captivity? Does fish sentience obligate us to change fishing practices?

Indicators & Assessment of Animal Welfare

  • Welfare exists on a continuum
    • From Optimal (body, mind, and natural behaviour all satisfied) to Minimal (none satisfactory).
  • Need for reliable, objective methods ➔ scientific research continually refines indicators & tools.

Four Core Categories of Indicators

  • Behavioural
    • Choices animals make; presence of abnormal behaviours (stereotypies, feather-pecking, bar-biting, tongue-rolling, weaving, wind-sucking).
  • Physical
    • Injury (cuts, tail/ear biting), body damage, abscesses, joint swelling, hair/wool loss, body condition.
  • Physiological
    • Stress hormones (cortisol), altered adrenal activity, immunosuppression, feed-intake changes.
  • Production
    • Growth rate, body weight, reproduction, milk/meat/egg/wool yields, meat texture.

Key Principle

  • Welfare is complex; assess multiple indicators to avoid misleading conclusions.

Three Main Sources of Indicators

\bullet The animal itself in its current state (behaviour frequency, hormone levels, body condition).
\bullet The animal in a decision-making test (preference testing, cognitive-bias tests).
\bullet The environment/situation (diet quality, climate exposure, housing/husbandry details).

Approaches to Welfare Assessment

CriterionNaturalisticFunctionalSubjective Experience
DefinitionWelfare depends on being able to perform natural behaviours and live naturally.Welfare relates to normal physiological & behavioural functioning.Welfare equals the animal’s feelings (pain, pleasure, suffering).
ConceptProvide natural environments & behaviours.Focus on biological function.Emphasise psychological well-being.
Research methodsField studies; compare wild vs. captive.Measure growth, productivity, reproduction; epidemiology; pathology; immune suppression.Operant conditioning; preference tests; stereotypy & conflict behaviour measures.
AdvantagesIntuitively appeals to public.Easier to demonstrate scientifically via measurable biology.Targets the core moral concern—subjective experience.
DisadvantagesIdealises nature; ignores adaptability to artificial systems.Links between function & welfare not always clear; conflicting measures problematic.Feelings can’t be directly observed; epistemologically difficult.

Objective vs. Subjective Measurement Continuum

  • Objective: Quantify rates, durations, frequencies, hormone concentrations, etc.
  • Subjective: Keeper questionnaires, qualitative behaviour assessment, lameness/pain scoring by trained observers.

Selecting Appropriate Indicators

  • Welfare aim: e.g. pain prevention vs. encouraging play.
  • Timescale: vocalisations (short-term) vs. ulcers (long-term stress).
  • Ethical constraints: prefer non-invasive sampling (faecal hormones) over blood draws when feasible.
  • Feasibility: budget, time, labour, technical expertise.

Key Takeaways

  • Animal welfare blends science (behaviour, physiology), ethics (moral reasoning), and practicality (husbandry, legislation).
  • The Five Freedoms remain a cornerstone but are complemented by modern frameworks (e.g. Five Domains, Quality of Life scales).
  • Effective assessment utilises multiple indicators across behaviour, body, and productivity, interpreted through an explicit welfare concept (naturalistic, functional, or subjective).
  • Ethical theories (deontology, utilitarianism, contractarianism) shape policy debates and personal choices—from lab protocols to dietary habits.
  • Because animals are sentient, their interests must be weighed in every human decision that affects them.