AP GOPO - Judicial Branch
Matching Test is
Marbury v Madison (1803)
McCulloch v Maryland (1819)
Schenck v U.S. (1919)
Gideon v Wainwright (1963)
Engel v Vitale (1962)
Wisconsin v Yoder (1972)
New York Times v U.S. (1971)
Baker v Carr (1962)
McDonald v Chicago (2010)
Shaw v Reno (1993)
Tinker v Des Moines (1969)
Brown v Board of Ed of Topeka (1954)
Citizens United v FEC (2010)
U.S. v Lopez (1995)
Roe v Wade (1973)
Gitlow v New York (1925)
Lawrence v Tevae (2003)
Article III created the Judicial Branch
determines constitutionality
Supreme Court is only mentioned in the Constitution once, which gives it more room to expand
federal cases only exist when there is a question of unconstitutionality
federal crimes
your rights have been violated
someone wasn't given proper guidance on an issue
Judiciary Act of 1789
created a three court system
established a basic system of courts
reinforced notion of federalism by creating a dual system
Congress can add to lower federal courts
Supreme Court
Appellate Court
District Courts
Supreme Court:
9 Justices
Court of last resort
Highest court in the land
Hears cases from Sate Supreme Court, Court of Appeals
Original Jurisdiction Cases
2+ states, U.S. & State; US/Foreign ambassadors & diplomats
Judicial review: ruling set precedent for entire nation
appellate: to appeal; concerned with or dealing with applications for decisions to be reversed
Federal Courts:
Constitutional courts
13 US Appellate Court
No original jurisdiction, strictly appellate
94 Federal District Courts (min. 1/state) - hear 80% of federal cases
Lowest level in Federal Court system
Only original jurisdiction; no appellate
Special/Legislative Courts: deals with cases from expressed powers
Judges serve fixed terms
U.S. Tax Court, U.S. Court of Appeal for armed forces
Jurisdiction
Depends on issue/nature of case
different kinds:
original
appellate
exclusive
concurrent
discretionary jurisdiction:
Judiciary Act of 1925
Supreme Court gets to choose its own docket
Reserved for Supreme Court
types of law:
common
civil
criminal
Appointment Process
presidential appoints judges - confirmed by Senate
president's appointment:
U.S. attorneys. federal marshals, district judges, circuit court judges, and supreme court justices
Senatorial courtesy
present consult's with a state's senator prior to nominating candidate for a court position in that state
custom for fellow senators to follow colleagues
November 1, 2022
Formal/informal requirements
ideology/partisanship-- very political process
judicial experience
additional trends:
litmus test on policy issues
race, religion, white, male, region, age, role (activist/restrained)
Vetting Process:
FBI/ABA analysis
litmus test
confirmation hearings (senate judiciary committee)
senate floor -- filibuster
Interest group Influence in the process
Contribute money to campaigns, lobby White House and Senators, op-ed pieces, protest, appear on TV
Federal appointment process:
Pre-nomination -- evaluation of possible nominees to Supreme Court
nomination: the president nominates a candidate
Confirmation: senate judiciary committee conducts evaluation of nominee including investigation
the senate judiciary committee conducts confirmation hearings and conducts voting and submits evaluation report to the senate
senate conducts voting to confirm the nominee
State appointment process:
popular vote -- most common
governor selects
state legislature selects -- least common
Are life terms good or not?
designed to be free from public opinion
life term, appointed, choose own docket, limited access to court proceedings, and salaries can't be reduced
court rarely deviates too far from public opinion
appointment/confirmation, judicial implementation, impeachment, judicial legitimacy, overruled with laws or Amendments
congress can change jurisdiction or number of justices
Supreme Court - Certiorari Process
petition
conference/discussion list
writ of ceriorari (discretionary jurisdiction)
rule of 4
if four justices want to hear a case, it's called up to SCOTUS
they will issue a document called writ of cert to the lower court to transfer the case to the supreme court
solicitor general influence
briefs
detailed arguments arguing each side of case
cite facts, legal principles, precedents
amicus curiae (friend of the court) - briefs submitted by interested parties (ie interest groups trying to influence the court's decision
oral argument
Opinion: est. precedent for entire nation/lower courts
majority opinion "law of the land"
concurring opinion
agreeing with the majority for a different reason than the majority
dissenting opinion
4:1 (one disagreeing)
per curiam aka group statement
an opinion from an appellate/supreme court that does not identify any specific judge who may have written the opinion
most cases decided on prior precedent
stare decisis: let the decision stand
vast majority of cases decided on previous precedent
Court docket:
cases are more likely to be heard if:
court decision conflicts with precedent
court of appeals decision that conflicts with another court of appeals decision
inconsistency between the courts of different states
split decision in court of appeals
more likely to void state and local laws than federal laws
political questions: doctrine developed and used as means to avoid deciding some cases
been construed narrowly; doesn't stop from hearing cases like abortion, campaign finance
supreme court has held that federal courts should not hear cases which deal directly with issues that constitution makes the sole responsibility of the other branches of government
court has held that the conduct of foreign relation is the sole responsibility of the executive branch, and cases challenging the way the executive is using that power present political questions
impact of decisions: judicial activism versus restraint
judicial activism v restraint:
refers to the process or method a judge uses to reach a particular decision, not to the political ramifications of the decision
activist (judicial activism)
strike down/alter acts and overturn previous rulings
influence policy
correct injustices; loose interpretation of the Constitution
defense: merely fulfilling courts job in system of checks and balances
more likely to support affirmation action; reproductive rights; equal protection
restrained (judicial restraint)
uses precedent and framers intent to decide cases
isn't the court's job to make policy, defer to two other branches
November 4th, 2022
Thurgood Marshall (1967)
First African American on SCOTUS
Sandra Day O’Conner (1981)
First female on SCOTUS
Sonia Sotomaor (2009)
First Latina on SCOTUS
Dr. Ketanji-Brown Jackson (2022)
First Black female on the court
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
First female Jewish person on the court
Roger Taney
Dred Scott v Sandford (1852)
Supreme Court held that former slaves did not have standing in federal courts because they lacked U.S. citizenship, even after they were freed
president can reduce a sentence, pardon, or amnesty
Matching Test is
Marbury v Madison (1803)
McCulloch v Maryland (1819)
Schenck v U.S. (1919)
Gideon v Wainwright (1963)
Engel v Vitale (1962)
Wisconsin v Yoder (1972)
New York Times v U.S. (1971)
Baker v Carr (1962)
McDonald v Chicago (2010)
Shaw v Reno (1993)
Tinker v Des Moines (1969)
Brown v Board of Ed of Topeka (1954)
Citizens United v FEC (2010)
U.S. v Lopez (1995)
Roe v Wade (1973)
Gitlow v New York (1925)
Lawrence v Tevae (2003)
Article III created the Judicial Branch
determines constitutionality
Supreme Court is only mentioned in the Constitution once, which gives it more room to expand
federal cases only exist when there is a question of unconstitutionality
federal crimes
your rights have been violated
someone wasn't given proper guidance on an issue
Judiciary Act of 1789
created a three court system
established a basic system of courts
reinforced notion of federalism by creating a dual system
Congress can add to lower federal courts
Supreme Court
Appellate Court
District Courts
Supreme Court:
9 Justices
Court of last resort
Highest court in the land
Hears cases from Sate Supreme Court, Court of Appeals
Original Jurisdiction Cases
2+ states, U.S. & State; US/Foreign ambassadors & diplomats
Judicial review: ruling set precedent for entire nation
appellate: to appeal; concerned with or dealing with applications for decisions to be reversed
Federal Courts:
Constitutional courts
13 US Appellate Court
No original jurisdiction, strictly appellate
94 Federal District Courts (min. 1/state) - hear 80% of federal cases
Lowest level in Federal Court system
Only original jurisdiction; no appellate
Special/Legislative Courts: deals with cases from expressed powers
Judges serve fixed terms
U.S. Tax Court, U.S. Court of Appeal for armed forces
Jurisdiction
Depends on issue/nature of case
different kinds:
original
appellate
exclusive
concurrent
discretionary jurisdiction:
Judiciary Act of 1925
Supreme Court gets to choose its own docket
Reserved for Supreme Court
types of law:
common
civil
criminal
Appointment Process
presidential appoints judges - confirmed by Senate
president's appointment:
U.S. attorneys. federal marshals, district judges, circuit court judges, and supreme court justices
Senatorial courtesy
present consult's with a state's senator prior to nominating candidate for a court position in that state
custom for fellow senators to follow colleagues
November 1, 2022
Formal/informal requirements
ideology/partisanship-- very political process
judicial experience
additional trends:
litmus test on policy issues
race, religion, white, male, region, age, role (activist/restrained)
Vetting Process:
FBI/ABA analysis
litmus test
confirmation hearings (senate judiciary committee)
senate floor -- filibuster
Interest group Influence in the process
Contribute money to campaigns, lobby White House and Senators, op-ed pieces, protest, appear on TV
Federal appointment process:
Pre-nomination -- evaluation of possible nominees to Supreme Court
nomination: the president nominates a candidate
Confirmation: senate judiciary committee conducts evaluation of nominee including investigation
the senate judiciary committee conducts confirmation hearings and conducts voting and submits evaluation report to the senate
senate conducts voting to confirm the nominee
State appointment process:
popular vote -- most common
governor selects
state legislature selects -- least common
Are life terms good or not?
designed to be free from public opinion
life term, appointed, choose own docket, limited access to court proceedings, and salaries can't be reduced
court rarely deviates too far from public opinion
appointment/confirmation, judicial implementation, impeachment, judicial legitimacy, overruled with laws or Amendments
congress can change jurisdiction or number of justices
Supreme Court - Certiorari Process
petition
conference/discussion list
writ of ceriorari (discretionary jurisdiction)
rule of 4
if four justices want to hear a case, it's called up to SCOTUS
they will issue a document called writ of cert to the lower court to transfer the case to the supreme court
solicitor general influence
briefs
detailed arguments arguing each side of case
cite facts, legal principles, precedents
amicus curiae (friend of the court) - briefs submitted by interested parties (ie interest groups trying to influence the court's decision
oral argument
Opinion: est. precedent for entire nation/lower courts
majority opinion "law of the land"
concurring opinion
agreeing with the majority for a different reason than the majority
dissenting opinion
4:1 (one disagreeing)
per curiam aka group statement
an opinion from an appellate/supreme court that does not identify any specific judge who may have written the opinion
most cases decided on prior precedent
stare decisis: let the decision stand
vast majority of cases decided on previous precedent
Court docket:
cases are more likely to be heard if:
court decision conflicts with precedent
court of appeals decision that conflicts with another court of appeals decision
inconsistency between the courts of different states
split decision in court of appeals
more likely to void state and local laws than federal laws
political questions: doctrine developed and used as means to avoid deciding some cases
been construed narrowly; doesn't stop from hearing cases like abortion, campaign finance
supreme court has held that federal courts should not hear cases which deal directly with issues that constitution makes the sole responsibility of the other branches of government
court has held that the conduct of foreign relation is the sole responsibility of the executive branch, and cases challenging the way the executive is using that power present political questions
impact of decisions: judicial activism versus restraint
judicial activism v restraint:
refers to the process or method a judge uses to reach a particular decision, not to the political ramifications of the decision
activist (judicial activism)
strike down/alter acts and overturn previous rulings
influence policy
correct injustices; loose interpretation of the Constitution
defense: merely fulfilling courts job in system of checks and balances
more likely to support affirmation action; reproductive rights; equal protection
restrained (judicial restraint)
uses precedent and framers intent to decide cases
isn't the court's job to make policy, defer to two other branches
November 4th, 2022
Thurgood Marshall (1967)
First African American on SCOTUS
Sandra Day O’Conner (1981)
First female on SCOTUS
Sonia Sotomaor (2009)
First Latina on SCOTUS
Dr. Ketanji-Brown Jackson (2022)
First Black female on the court
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
First female Jewish person on the court
Roger Taney
Dred Scott v Sandford (1852)
Supreme Court held that former slaves did not have standing in federal courts because they lacked U.S. citizenship, even after they were freed
president can reduce a sentence, pardon, or amnesty