WK.5: Power, Politics, and Conflict
Introduction to Health Services Management
Professor: Dr. Reshma Prashad, PhD, MHI, PMP, CPHIMS, CCMP, ITIL
Learning Outcomes
Understanding Power: Comprehend what power is, how and where to identify it, and its manifestation within health care organizations.
Conflict Management Focus: Emphasize the crucial role of conflict management in handling both power and politics effectively.
Importance of Power and Politics: Recognize the essential and necessary functions that power and politics play in ensuring organizations and workers perform effectively.
What is Power and Where Does It Come From?
Definition of Power: Power is the control one group possesses over another's behavior.
It frequently involves coercion, which refers to the application of subtle influence dynamics to accomplish desired objectives.
It necessitates two or more parties engaging in continuous interaction.
Three Major Sources of Power within Organizations:
Structural: Power derived from the formal organizational structure, roles, and hierarchy.
Cultural: Power stemming from the shared values, norms, traditions, and beliefs prevalent within the organization.
Knowledge-based: Power originating from unique expertise, information, or specialized skills held by individuals or groups.
Key Power Relationships in Health Care Organizations
Physician-Patient Relationship:
Traditionally, physicians commanded significant authority over patients. However, this dynamic is currently undergoing a shift towards more shared decision-making.
Physician-Nurse Relationship:
Physicians typically exert direct influence over nursing work assignments, compensation, and employment status.
Physician-Administrator Relationship:
The presence of dual hierarchies (medical and administrative) often creates tensions and ambiguities, as both groups stake claims to power.
The Political Nature of Power
Health care organizations are inherently very political due to the presence of several distinct and powerful stakeholder groups.
Negative Aspect of Politics: Politics can be inefficient, as it often requires individuals and groups to devote valuable time and resources towards self-interests rather than collective organizational goals.
Positive Aspect of Politics: Politics also plays a positive and critical role in organizations by encouraging different groups and individuals to share power, fostering collaboration and compromise.
The Abuse of Power in Health Care Organizations
Definition of Power Abuse: This refers to the utilization of power in ways that are generally considered unacceptable, primarily serving self-interest rather than the organization's best interests.
Two Main Reasons for Power Abuse:
Advancement of personal ends: Pursuing individual benefits at the expense of customers, shareholders, or employees.
Advancement of organizational ends: While seemingly positive, this can also be a form of abuse when organizational goals are pursued through unethical or harmful means, which can be difficult to discern.
Negative Fallout from Power Abuse by Managers:
Loss of trust among employees and stakeholders.
Uncertainty regarding goal achievement, leading to decreased productivity.
Significant harm to the organization's reputation.
Trust, Fairness, and Transparency in Preventing Power Abuse
Steps to Guard Against the Abuse of Power:
Structuring Communication Networks: Implementing systems that foster greater transparency in communication throughout the organization.
Utilizing Boards of Directors and Advisory Groups: Establishing these bodies to act as counterbalances to unchecked managerial authority, providing oversight and guidance.
Creating a Strong Code of Ethics: Developing and enforcing a comprehensive set of ethical guidelines that govern behavior and decision-making.
Designing Appropriate Appraisal Systems: Implementing fair and objective performance evaluation systems that reward ethical conduct and discourage power abuse.
Emphasizing Personal Integrity: Fostering a culture where personal integrity and ethical behavior are highly valued and promoted among all personnel.
Power as a Key Source of Conflict
Conflict associated with power and politics primarily stems from two circumstances:
Differing Perspectives and Agendas: Parties hold distinct viewpoints, ideas, or intentions and are determined to advance their own.
Unequal Access to Power: Interdependent parties draw upon different sources of power or have unequal opportunities to acquire or exert power.
Conflict Management: This refers to how parties approach, deal with, and ultimately resolve disagreements or disputes.
Types of Conflict
Task Conflict:
Involves differences among parties in understanding and executing tasks.
Challenge: The primary difficulty lies in understanding and reconciling individual viewpoints and approaches to the task.
Relationship Conflict:
Pertains to disagreements regarding an inherent characteristic of the other party.
Causes: Examples include differing interpersonal styles, personality clashes, or perceived intrinsic traits.
Challenge: The main difficulty is navigating and managing heightened emotions that typically accompany such conflicts.
The Negative Side of Emotions
When individuals perceive a threat, their thinking patterns often become rigid or inflexible, hindering open-mindedness.
Heightened emotions typically result in a decreased ability to cognitively process information, evaluate various ideas, or identify possible solutions effectively.
Emotional Contagion: This phenomenon occurs when emotions are involuntarily transmitted from one party to another, potentially escalating the emotional intensity of a situation.
Common Mistakes in Thinking About Conflict
A significant error negotiators frequently make when approaching conflict is failing to plan or thoroughly think through the conflict before attempting to address it.
Components of an Effective Plan for Negotiation:
A clear description of one's own interests or needs.
Consideration of possible positions or offers that could be made.
Specific goals regarding the desired positions for the negotiation outcome.
Identification of possible tactics to employ in achieving those goals.
Common Mistakes in Managing Relationships
Not Thinking About the Other Party:
Reciprocity: The inherent tendency for individuals to exchange equivalent levels of goods, services, or behaviors with others. Failing to consider this can harm relationships.
Adding Up Personal Not Collective Gain:
Cognitively Active: The act of being consciously focused on the interests and positions of all parties involved in a negotiation, not just one's own, for mutual benefit.
Failing to Trust:
Self-Fulfilling Prophecy: A psychological phenomenon where one's beliefs about another person influence that person's behavior in a way that ultimately supports and confirms the initial belief.
Key Conflict Management Strategies
Conflict strategies are characterized by different approaches to value, which represents the combined benefits achieved among all parties in a negotiated agreement.
Most Common Strategies for Engaging Another Party and Seeking Resolution:
Compromising: Seeking a middle ground where both parties make some concessions.
Competing: Prioritizing one's own interests and striving to win at the expense of the other party.
Collaborating: Working together to find a solution that fully satisfies the concerns of all parties, often requiring creativity and mutual understanding.
Tactics to Acquire More Information
Do Research: Systematically gather objective data and relevant background information pertinent to the conflict or negotiation.
Ask Questions: Employ specific and well-formulated questions to uncover crucial information about the other party's interests, needs, and positions in a negotiation.
Find Common Ground: Engage in behaviors or discussions that help multiple parties identify shared goals, interests, or values, which can facilitate agreement.
Tactics to Influence the Other Party
Make a strong opening offer: Setting an ambitious but justifiable initial proposal can anchor the negotiation.
Use objective criteria: Referencing external standards, data, or precedents to justify proposals and decisions.
Form a coalition: Partnering with other parties who share similar interests to increase bargaining power.
Use BATNA / Power of walk-away: Clearly understanding one's Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement and being willing to disengage if a satisfactory outcome isn't reached.
Plan concessions: Strategically determining in advance what concessions can be made, when, and under what conditions.