Diagnostic pitfalls in breast cancer pathology are numerous and can have significant management implications.
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive breast carcinomas present challenges in diagnosis, particularly with core needle biopsy (CNB) specimens.
Awareness of these pitfalls can aid in creating differential diagnoses and improve accurate classifications and management.
The purpose is to highlight diagnostic challenges and provide histologic clues and guidance on using immunohistochemistry for accurate diagnosis.
DCIS is characterized by malignant intraductal epithelial proliferation of varying nuclear grades (low, intermediate, high).
Features range from architectural forms including solid, cribriform, micropapillary, and more.
Wide variability in lesions can mimic DCIS, complicating diagnosis.
Distinction Between UDH and Intermediate-Nuclear-Grade DCIS
Usual Ductal Hyperplasia (UDH) may mimic intermediate-grade DCIS; careful evaluation of morphology is essential.
Key features:
UDH shows polymorphous epithelial cells, often with distinct cytological characteristics.
Intermediate-grade DCIS is typically more uniform with less architectural organization.
DCIS vs. Lobular Carcinoma In Situ (LCIS)
High-grade DCIS may resemble the pleomorphic variant of LCIS or vice versa, making distinction crucial.
Classic LCIS lacks the architectural atypia seen in DCIS and is characterized by dyshesion due to E-cadherin loss.
Diagnostic clues include looking for microacini or rosette formations in DCIS.
Necrosis as a Diagnostic Feature
Necrosis can complicate diagnosis; while often associated with DCIS, can be present in UDH, leading to potential misclassification.
Immunostaining with estrogen receptor (ER) and CK5/6 can be helpful:
DCIS shows strong ER positivity and CK5/6 negativity.
UDH presents variable expression.
Immunohistochemical Clues:
ER positivity in DCIS with a mosaic staining pattern seen in UDH.
Clues to focus on when necrosis is evident.
Background atypical proliferations in breast tissue can assist in the differentiation of these lesions.
A misdiagnosis of DCIS may result in unnecessary surgical interventions and treatments, whereas UDH may require no further management.
Critical to differentiate accurately to prevent overtreatment or undertreatment of patients.
Collagenous spherulosis may mimic cribriform DCIS patterns.
Adenoid cystic carcinoma shows similar patterns but features distinctive nuclear arrangements and fewer infiltrative characteristics.
Papillary lesions can also overlap with DCIS; distinguishing features rely on the presence or absence of myoepithelial cells in the architecture.
Lymphovascular Invasion (LVI) vs. DCIS
The presence of tumor nests in lymphovascular spaces can mimic DCIS; recognizing distribution and utilizing myoepithelial cell markers can clarify diagnosis.
Papillary Carcinoma
Encapsulated papillary carcinomas and solid papillary carcinomas may often present indistinctly.
Need for careful differentiation using immunostains and morphologic characteristics.
Triple-Negative Breast Carcinomas (TNBC)
high-grade TNBC must differentiate from other high-grade carcinomas.
Considering clinical history and immunostaining helps avoid misclassification.
Accurate recognition of diagnostic pitfalls in breast pathology, particularly from CNB, requires a strong understanding of morphologic features and the appropriate application of immunohistochemistry to aid in preventing misdiagnosis.
Descriptive diagnoses with recommended excisions for definitive assessments are critical to ensure accurate patient management.