Notes on 'Omission' by John McPhee

Omission by John McPhee

Overview

  • Article published in The New Yorker on September 7, 2015

  • Written by John McPhee, detailing his experiences as a writer, especially focusing on the theme of what to leave out in writing.

Entry-Level Jobs for Writers

  • In the 1950s, entry-level writing jobs included a column called "Miscellany," presenting one-sentence oddities.

    • Structure: Each item had a title, typically a pun.

    • Writers typically did not stay long in this position.

    • McPhee ended up working on Miscellany for 1.5 years, producing about 1,000 stories and puns.

    • Example: Title of a story was "Two Tired," based on a person falling asleep while biking.

Transition from Puns to Serious Writing

  • McPhee reflects on leaving puns behind upon joining The New Yorker in 1965.

    • Acknowledges occasional relapses into pun use, recounting an instance of an unfit pun which his editor Robert Bingham sought to cut from a manuscript.

    • Dialogue with Robert Bingham:

    • McPhee argued for the pun’s inclusion, citing its humor.

    • Bingham insisted it did not match the tone of the piece but ultimately let McPhee decide.

    • McPhee later chose to remove the pun himself.

About Robert Bingham

  • Bingham served as McPhee's editor for sixteen years.

    • McPhee was organically handed off from initial editor William Shawn to Bingham.

    • Bingham had a background as managing editor at The Reporter prior to joining The New Yorker.

Writing the "Oranges" Manuscript

  • McPhee's significant piece involved a journey about oranges.

    • Inspired to explore why four oranges might have different names after noticing variations in juice color.

    • Encountered the Citrus Experiment Station with many Ph.D. holders and extensive resources on citrus.

    • The initial intention was to create a short piece under 10,000 words, but it grew significantly.

    • Manuscript initially underwent severe condensation (85% cut) by Bingham, resulting in a shocking thin manuscript returned to McPhee.

Conversation with Mr. Shawn

  • Faced with Bingham's cuts, McPhee sought a meeting with Shawn, who was surprised by Bingham's drastic edits.

    • Bingham and McPhee discussed which parts to restore; a partial restoration allowed for a serialized publication.

Themes in Writing

  • Selection in Writing:

    • Emphasizes the writer's right to choose inclusions/exclusions.

    • The notion that if something interests the writer, it should be included.

  • Importance of Growth:

    • Projects can evolve beyond initial intent, exemplified with an aircraft observational piece that changed drastically in scope.

Creative Nonfiction

  • Creative nonfiction is characterized not by fabrication, but by maximizing what is at hand.

    • McPhee's course at college touches on this, emphasizing the creative aspect within nonfiction writing.

The Role of Quotes

  • Quotes can capture character voices effectively in writing.

  • McPhee acknowledges that he knows a potential quote for inclusion as soon as he hears it.

Experience with Editing and Revising

  • Reflections on the editing process at Time magazine emphasized a similar theme of selection.

  • Described workflow involving pneumatic tubes for story submissions and extensive revisions.

    • Editors would leave their marks, indicating sections of text to condense.

  • Greening Process:

    • The craft of selectively editing to improve readability and flow; removing text that does not serve the piece.

    • Practical exercises involved cutting tasks for students while preserving the essence of the writing.

Philosophical Reflections on Writing

  • McPhee discusses aesthetic principles underlying writing, such as balance between inclusion and omission.

  • Draws parallels to both writing and visual arts, citing Michelangelo’s thoughts on sculpting.

  • Hemingway's Theory of Omission:

    • Quotes from Hemingway highlight the importance of leaving certain details unsaid for effect.

    • The iceberg metaphor illustrates how leaving out information builds a depth of understanding for the reader.

  • Emotional Connection:

    • Engaging reader imagination by providing a few vivid details to evoke comprehensive imagery; leaving white space for reader interpretation.

The Importance of Leaving Out Details

  • Personal anecdotes reflect struggles of what to include/exclude in writing.

    • Example from a ride with Louis Marx to meet General Eisenhower illustrates the balance of relevant versus superfluous details.

    • Challenges of negotiating which memories enhance or detract from the narrative flow.

  • Concludes with a personal story of Eisenhower discussing his painting, reinforcing the theme of judicious selection in creative expression.

Closing Thoughts

  • Writing remains an act of continuous selection, emphasizing the balance of presence and absence across a text.