WILSON 1B03 - Science DENIALISM
Aim of the class: Addressing misinformation and science denial
Inquiry Question
Central inquiry question: "How can I identify and respond to misinformation and science denial?".
Defining Science Denial
Summary by participant: "It's like looking at facts and not putting them because of your own perspective or experience and telling others they’re not true."
Additional input: Using science for personal benefit (e.g., industries denying climate change for profit).
Examples of Science Denial
Mention of various examples of science denial, such as:
Oil Industry (e.g., Exxon denying climate change)
Tobacco Industry
Flat earth theories
Refusal to wear masks during COVID-19
Issues with chemicals in furniture, pesticides, and microplastics.
Framework for Understanding Science Denial: FLIC
Introduction of the FLIC acronym developed by John Cook:
Fake Experts
Individuals presented as experts in their fields but lack genuine expertise.
Example: Dr. Phil providing medical advice despite not being a licensed medical doctor.
2. Logical Fallacies
Errors in reasoning that invalidate arguments.
Example: Straw man argument (misrepresentation of an opponent's argument for easier refutation).
3. Impossible Expectations
Expectations for excessive or impossible evidence in scientific claims.
Example: Dismissing climate predictions based on short-term weather predictions.
4. Cherry Picking
Selecting data that supports one's viewpoint while ignoring contradictory evidence.
Often seen in media where partial truths are amplified.
5. Conspiracy Theories
Beliefs that events or circumstances are caused by secret plots from powerful groups (example: flat earthers).
Discussion on the complexity of these categories and acknowledgment of subtypes related to each technique.
Strategies for Responding to Misinformation
Three suggested strategies for debunking misinformation:
Fact-Based
Engage in fact-checking and cross-referencing.
Source-Based
Discrediting non-reputable sources.
Logic-Based
Explaining logical fallacies and why they undermine arguments.
Mention of the SIFT method for evaluating claims:
Stop, Investigate, Find better coverage, Trace claims back to the source.
Importance of addressing both cognitive and emotional aspects of misinformation.
Examining Evidence
Need for good questioning around sources, including:
Author’s intent, values, and worldview.
Checking publication date is crucial (especially online).
Wrap-up Discussion Questions
Discuss similarities and differences between misinformation promoted by tobacco and oil industry.
Analyze how science denial has changed or remained consistent over time.
Why it is important to critically evaluate sources related to historical and present issues.
Emphasis on education as a tool for combating misinformation and changing narratives.
Conclusion
Reinforcement of the importance of education in addressing and discrediting misinformation.
Recognition of broader societal changes in response to misinformation campaigns concerning tobacco and climate change.