Frankenstein

Introduction

  • David, a lecturer at the University of Huddersfield, introduces himself and discusses the focus of the talk.

    • Topic: Unreliable narration in Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein."

    • Addressing students interested in studying English at the university.

Initial Engagement with the Audience

  • David inquires about the students' progress with "Frankenstein."

    • Responses: Some students have not started, while others have reached Chapter 3.

    • David recalls his own initial confusion during the first reading, expecting certain tropes associated with the "mad scientist."

Concept of Unreliable Narration

  • Definition and distinction between author and narrator:

    • Author: The real-life person who writes the book (Mary Shelley).

    • Narrator: The voice telling the story, which can be a character within the book or an omniscient presence.

  • Discussion of the multiple narrators in "Frankenstein."

    • Main Narrators Identified:

    • Robert Walton (the epistolary framing narrator).

    • Victor Frankenstein (intradiegetic narrator).

    • The Creature (metadiegetic narrator).

Embedded Narratives

  • Introduction of Mise en Abyme: A story within a story, also known as an embedded narrative.

  • Discussion of how narratives in "Frankenstein" are layered, with stories told from different perspectives.

    • Example of narration being influenced by characters' views, bias, and potential manipulation.

The Structure of the Narration

  • Emphasis on the complexity of information relay:

    • Most accounts in "Frankenstein" are hearsay, changed over time before reaching the reader.

    • Multiple perspectives contribute to the overall unreliable narration.

  • David uses the example of the Creature retelling a story learned from the De Lacey family, implying that narratives are not always direct accounts.

Nature of Unreliable Narrators

  • Definition of an unreliable narrator:

    • Not necessarily lying but not telling the whole truth.

    • They may be biased or emotionally affected, influencing the narrative's reliability.

  • Factors contributing to a narrator's unreliability include:

    • Deliberate lies.

    • Misunderstandings or poor vantage points when events occurred.

    • Omissions of crucial information or emotions clouding their judgment.

The Implications of Multiple Perspectives

  • Analysis of how the relationship between narrator and narratee affects reliability.

    • Each narrator has different motivations, biases, and emotional states.

    • Walton's initial insights into his reliability questioned through the emotional influences the narrators face.

Discussion on Emotional Bias

  • David engages the audience on their interpretation of emotional bias in narration:

    • The influence of emotional context on how narrators engage with each other in the book.

  • Example: Walton's interaction with Frankenstein might cloud his judgment and alter reliability.

The Characters' Relationships

  • Complexity of Walton and Frankenstein's relationship:

    • Intensive focus on how their interactions dictate the reliability of the stories shared.

    • How Walton's admiration for Frankenstein may lead him to present a biased narrative.

The Narrative's Reliability

  • Exploration of extremes in characters' reliability:

    • Walton's letters serve as a gateway to Frankenstein's story, yet they might not reflect total accuracy.

  • David discusses potential outcomes in a hypothetical court case comparing narrative reliability:

    • Suggests all narrators could be considered unreliable since their perspectives might be altered due to emotional or situational context.

Analysis of the Themes

  • Reflection on how characters such as Frankenstein and the Creature represent themes of trust and betrayal:

    • Frankenstein’s emotions towards the Creature potentially skewing his narrative and Walton’s interpretation.

  • Proposed difficulties in determining who is the hero and who is the villain adds to the unreliable narration discourse.

Conclusion

  • David summarizes the importance of recognizing both narrators and narratees in analyzing reliability in "Frankenstein."

    • Close with a reminder that students should think critically about whose perspective they're getting when they read any narrative.

  • Invitation for conclusions, questions, and thoughts on studying English at Huddersfield.

Key Terms and Concepts

  • Unreliable Narrator: A narrator whose credibility is compromised due to bias or other factors.

  • Mise en Abyme: A narrative technique where a story is set within another story.

  • Embedded Narrative: A narrative that exists within the larger framework of another narrative.

  • Framing Narrative: The overarching story that sets the context for the embedded narratives.

  • Narratee: The presumed audience within the text who listens to the narrator's story and may influence its interpretation.