CC Ch 7
Community Corrections
Probation and Intermediary Sanctions
Chapter 7
The Origins of Probation
Key Terms
Probare: Latin term meaning to prove or test; foundational to the concept of probation.
Conditional Release: An approach to legal punishment allowing for community re-entry, primarily via probation.
Historical Context
Approximately 90% of criminal sentences are served through probation, contrasting with imprisonment, which is more modern and costly.
The Punishment and Enlightenment Period highlighted a shift from barbarity to a focus on contemplation for rehabilitation.
Historical Development
Judicial Reprieve
Early American courts utilized judicial reprieve, permitting conditional release for those already convicted and awaiting trial.
Initially focused on those released on recognizance.
John Augustus
A Boston cobbler who created the first structured probation system in the 1840s.
Developed a model where he supervised selected offenders at home and supported their reform efforts.
Legislative Milestones
Massachusetts authorized the hiring of salaried probation officers in 1878.
The Ex Parte United States [Killits] decision in 1916 led to the National Probation Act of 1925, allowing judges to suspend sentences for probation placements.
Offender Demographics and Statistics
General Statistics (2015)
3,789,800 adult Americans on probation (1 in 61 adults).
1,966,100 new entries into probation; 2,043,200 exits from the system.
Demographic Breakdown
Males: 75% of the adult probation population.
55% were white, 30% black, 13% Hispanic, 4% classified as ’other’.
Community Corrections Rationale
Definition and Public Perception
Community corrections involve rehabilitative measures allowing offenders to serve their sentences in society.
Viewed by the public as “soft on crime”; perceptions differ between experienced offenders and those new to the criminal justice system.
Benefits
Provides alternatives to incarceration, lessening prison overcrowding.
Enhances rehabilitation through community ties.
The Role of Probation Officers
Responsibilities
Dual role: 1) Protect the community; 2) Assist probationers to become law-abiding citizens.
They act as law enforcement officers and social workers, depending on the clientele's legal status.
Legal Authority
Officers enforce court orders, monitor program adherence, and may conduct arrests and searches if necessary.
They are often required to appear in court regarding their cases.
Models of Supervision
Effectiveness and Challenges
Effectiveness of supervision varies from dismal to outstanding.
Challenges include building trust with a predominantly minority clientele while most officers are from a white middle class background.
Different Models of Supervision
Law Enforcement Role: Emphasizes strict compliance, holding offenders accountable.
Social Worker Role: Focuses on helping offenders change their behavior, allowing for some leniency.
Hybrid Role: An authoritative blend of both approaches according to departmental policies and individual officers.
Probation Violations and Sanctions
Trends
Economic pressures may lead to cost-cutting measures utilizing evidence-based research.
Officers have discretion on whether to initiate probation violations which subsequently must be presented to a judge.
Probation Officer Stress
Nature of the Job
Often not lucrative and involves daily challenges with difficult individuals.
Job demands can lead to high stress, absenteeism, and turnover rates.
Research Findings
Finn and Kuck (2005): Analysis of job-related stress in different states.
Slate et al. (2003): Identified primary job stressors, emphasizing that stress management should be organizational.
Engaging the Community
Community Involvement
Historical focus on community effort that has diminished with professionalization, but still strong in some countries like Japan.
Importance of Social Bonds
Social Bonds (Hirschi, 1969) and Social Capital (Sampson and Laub, 1999) serve as preventative measures against recidivism.
Essential for effective case management, requiring officers to assess client needs and network with community resources.
Intermediate Sanctions
Definition and Implementation
Innovative alternatives to prison sentences that are less punitive than incarceration but more than standard probation.
Aim to reduce prison overcrowding while ensuring safety in communities.
Specific Intermediate Programs
1. Work Release
Maintains employment opportunities for offenders under structured surveillance, reinforcing community ties and reducing costs.
2. Intensive Supervision Probation (ISP)
Focus on limited clientele with reduced caseloads for closer supervision to enhance compliance.
3. Shock Probation/Parole
Introduced in Ohio, designed to deter future offenses by exposing offenders briefly to prison conditions.
4. Correctional Boot Camps
Military-style correctional facilities aimed at discipline and reform.
Evaluations on effectiveness, such as those by May et al. (2005) and Botcher and Ezell (2005).
Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programs (VORPs)
Program Outline
Focused on reconciling offenders and victims to address wrongs, integral to the restorative justice philosophy.
Encourages fairness and justice as defined by victims themselves.
Outcomes
Offers offenders insight into victims' feelings, often employed in juvenile systems; less in violent crime cases.
Mixed results on effectiveness and satisfaction from participants based on Umbreit (1994) research.
Resources for Further Learning
Access online resources including quizzes, eFlashcards, journal articles, and multimedia resources at edge.sagepub.com/stohressentials3e.