Operations & Supply-Chain Notes – Forecasting, Bottlenecks & Capacity in the Samosa Case

Demand Forecasting – Principles & Initial Numbers

  • Definition & purpose
    • Demand forecast = informed estimate of future sales; always an approximation, never exact.
    • Used to align Marketing, Finance, Operations & Supply-Chain decisions.

  • Sakshi’s Samosas initial top-down forecast
    • Monthly demand assumed: 220 samosas / month220\text{ samosas / month}.
    • Simplifying assumption: 4 weeks / month4\text{ weeks / month}55 samosas / week55\text{ samosas / week}.
    • 3 operating days / week ⇒ 1819 units / day18\text{–}19\text{ units / day}.

  • Why it is conservative
    • Based on only 5%5\% of dorm (McNutt) residents trying the product.
    • Assumes only a couple of repeat purchases per month.
    • Minimal capital at risk → over-forecasting carries limited financial penalty.

  • Key lesson
    • Always create contingency plans: What if we sell far more? What if we sell far less?
    • Example from retail: video-game launches (Battlefield 6); a ±10%10\% error on 100,000100,000-unit forecast is considered “good”.

Core Business Model Elements for the Samosa Venture

Key Activities
  • Cooking process (80 % of work)
    • Mixing dough & spices
    • Forming/filling samosas
    • Frying
    • Cooling
    • Packing

  • Supporting tasks
    • Taking orders / point of sale (Shopify)
    • Advertising & social-media marketing
    • Washing dishes / cleanup
    • HR: hiring, scheduling
    • Compliance: dorm approvals, permits

Key Resources
  • Physical: shared kitchen, stove, fryer, mixer, packaging supplies

  • Human: Sakshi (founder/chef), potential hire Ash

  • Intellectual: grandmother’s recipe (IP)

  • Financial: borrowed funds from friends / family

Key Partnerships
  • Dorm administration (facility access)

  • Student customer base & word of mouth

  • Advertising platforms

  • Shopify for e-commerce transactions

  • Analogy: lemonade stand requires parents + HOA permissions – partners can "keep you in business or take you out."

Operations Foundations – Transforming Inputs to Outputs

  • Inputs: raw food materials, money, data

  • Transformation: 5-step cooking process adds value → saleable samosa

  • Outputs: finished food + customer experience

  • Analysis goals: identify bottlenecks & continuously improve throughput, cost & quality.

Real-World Supply-Chain Illustrations

  • Target
    • Turned local stores into mini-warehouses to compete with Amazon’s same-day promise.

  • Ulta Beauty
    • Only some stores have sufficient backroom space to double as distribution nodes.

  • Outsource vs Insource
    • Apple’s decision to bring certain component production in-house for reliability.

  • Tesla Cybertruck mis-pricing
    • Promised $39,999\$39{,}999, launched at $60,000+\$60{,}000+ → result of siloed decision making.

  • Bottom line: Marketing, Ops & Finance must iterate together to align price, cost & capability.

Process-Analysis Toolkit Introduced

  • Cycle time: time to execute an individual task.

  • Capacity rate: output per unit time (e.g.
    rate=1/cycle time  units/min\text{rate}=1/\text{cycle time} \;\text{units/min}).

  • Flow time (throughput time): total time for a unit to travel the complete process.

  • Gantt chart: left-to-right visual of task timing & resource utilization.

  • Bottleneck: stage/resource that limits overall system capacity.

  • Process-capacity formula:

    (Time available - Time first unit) / Time bottleneck + 1

Case Study – Baseline (Solo Sakshi)

Step times
  1. Mix dough & prep filling – 6min6\,\text{min}

  2. Fill samosa – 2min2\,\text{min}

  3. Fry – 10min10\,\text{min}

  4. Cool – 5min5\,\text{min}

  5. Pack – 2min2\,\text{min}

  • Flow time (first unit): 6+2+10+5+2=25min6+2+10+5+2 = 25\,\text{min}.

  • With one person, Sakshi herself is the bottleneck (she touches every step for the full 25min25\,\text{min}).

  • 4-hr shift Tavailable=240min\Rightarrow T_{\text{available}} = 240\,\text{min}.

  • Capacity:
    2402525+1=9.69 batches\frac{240-25}{25}+1 = 9.6 \approx 9 \text{ batches}
    → ~23 samosas/week23\text{ samosas/week} (3 production days).

  • "0.6" of a batch = partially fried, unsellable units – illustrates importance of interpreting fractional outputs.

Process Improvement – Hiring Ash & Letting the Fryer Run Unattended

  • New resource allocation
    • Sakshi: Steps 1-2 (total 8min8\,\text{min})
    • Fryer: Step 3 (unmanned, 10min10\,\text{min})
    • Ash: Steps 4-5 (total 7min7\,\text{min})

  • Overlapping production now possible – multiple batches in process concurrently.

  • Class poll on when to start Batch #2 (minute 9, 10, 11)
    • Earlier start (9) = front-load → buffer against breakdowns.
    • Later start (11) = just-in-time → maximum freshness, minimal WIP.

Updated Bottleneck & Capacity
  • Bottleneck shifts to Fryer (longest single task, always busy).

  • First-unit flow time still 25min25\,\text{min}, but ongoing units gated every 10min10\,\text{min}.

  • Capacity per 4-hr shift:
    2402510+1=22.522 batches\frac{240-25}{10}+1 = 22.5 \approx 22 \text{ batches}.

  • Weekly capacity (3 days): 22×3=6622 \times 3 = 66 samosas.

Strategic Question – Should We Hire Ash?

Pros

  • Meets & exceeds forecast (66>55) giving sales upside.

  • Shorter customer wait times.

  • Allows founder to take breaks / avoid burnout.
    Cons

  • Added labor cost; profitability depends on unit margin.

  • Risk of overproduction if sales remain at conservative level.

  • Must analyze contribution margin:
    • If unit margin (\text{Price} - \text{Variable Cost})<0, higher volume increases total loss!
    → Finance session on Monday will compute exact breakeven & ROI.

When NOT to Elevate the Bottleneck

  • Additional capacity may be too expensive (e.g., $5,000 espresso machine).

  • Scarcity of skilled labor/unique IP (expert scientist, proprietary tech).

  • Demand uncertainty – investing upfront may create unused capacity.

Conceptual Takeaways

  • Forecasts should always be stress-tested against operational reality.

  • Bottleneck dictates system output; relieving it can transform capacity.

  • Cross-functional integration (Marketing–Ops–Finance) prevents costly mismatches (e.g.
    Cybertruck price fiasco).

  • Just-in-Time vs Buffering involves trade-offs among freshness, risk & capital tied up in WIP.

  • Never accept raw numbers without interpretation (the “0.6 samosa” lesson).

  • Decision to expand capacity (hire, buy equipment) must include cost/benefit, not just technical feasibility.

Next Steps / Upcoming Class Links

  • Monday’s Finance lecture will:
    • Quantify unit contribution margin.
    • Calculate breakeven volumes with & without Ash.
    • Evaluate ROI of hiring decision.

  • Catch up on asynchronous Top-Hat modules; revisit process-mapping terminology.