Operations & Supply-Chain Notes – Forecasting, Bottlenecks & Capacity in the Samosa Case
Demand Forecasting – Principles & Initial Numbers
Definition & purpose
• Demand forecast = informed estimate of future sales; always an approximation, never exact.
• Used to align Marketing, Finance, Operations & Supply-Chain decisions.Sakshi’s Samosas initial top-down forecast
• Monthly demand assumed: .
• Simplifying assumption: → .
• 3 operating days / week ⇒ .Why it is conservative
• Based on only of dorm (McNutt) residents trying the product.
• Assumes only a couple of repeat purchases per month.
• Minimal capital at risk → over-forecasting carries limited financial penalty.Key lesson
• Always create contingency plans: What if we sell far more? What if we sell far less?
• Example from retail: video-game launches (Battlefield 6); a ± error on -unit forecast is considered “good”.
Core Business Model Elements for the Samosa Venture
Key Activities
Cooking process (80 % of work)
• Mixing dough & spices
• Forming/filling samosas
• Frying
• Cooling
• PackingSupporting tasks
• Taking orders / point of sale (Shopify)
• Advertising & social-media marketing
• Washing dishes / cleanup
• HR: hiring, scheduling
• Compliance: dorm approvals, permits
Key Resources
Physical: shared kitchen, stove, fryer, mixer, packaging supplies
Human: Sakshi (founder/chef), potential hire Ash
Intellectual: grandmother’s recipe (IP)
Financial: borrowed funds from friends / family
Key Partnerships
Dorm administration (facility access)
Student customer base & word of mouth
Advertising platforms
Shopify for e-commerce transactions
Analogy: lemonade stand requires parents + HOA permissions – partners can "keep you in business or take you out."
Operations Foundations – Transforming Inputs to Outputs
Inputs: raw food materials, money, data
Transformation: 5-step cooking process adds value → saleable samosa
Outputs: finished food + customer experience
Analysis goals: identify bottlenecks & continuously improve throughput, cost & quality.
Real-World Supply-Chain Illustrations
Target
• Turned local stores into mini-warehouses to compete with Amazon’s same-day promise.Ulta Beauty
• Only some stores have sufficient backroom space to double as distribution nodes.Outsource vs Insource
• Apple’s decision to bring certain component production in-house for reliability.Tesla Cybertruck mis-pricing
• Promised , launched at → result of siloed decision making.Bottom line: Marketing, Ops & Finance must iterate together to align price, cost & capability.
Process-Analysis Toolkit Introduced
Cycle time: time to execute an individual task.
Capacity rate: output per unit time (e.g.
).Flow time (throughput time): total time for a unit to travel the complete process.
Gantt chart: left-to-right visual of task timing & resource utilization.
Bottleneck: stage/resource that limits overall system capacity.
Process-capacity formula:
(Time available - Time first unit) / Time bottleneck + 1
Case Study – Baseline (Solo Sakshi)
Step times
Mix dough & prep filling –
Fill samosa –
Fry –
Cool –
Pack –
Flow time (first unit): .
With one person, Sakshi herself is the bottleneck (she touches every step for the full ).
4-hr shift .
Capacity:
→ ~ (3 production days)."0.6" of a batch = partially fried, unsellable units – illustrates importance of interpreting fractional outputs.
Process Improvement – Hiring Ash & Letting the Fryer Run Unattended
New resource allocation
• Sakshi: Steps 1-2 (total )
• Fryer: Step 3 (unmanned, )
• Ash: Steps 4-5 (total )Overlapping production now possible – multiple batches in process concurrently.
Class poll on when to start Batch #2 (minute 9, 10, 11)
• Earlier start (9) = front-load → buffer against breakdowns.
• Later start (11) = just-in-time → maximum freshness, minimal WIP.
Updated Bottleneck & Capacity
Bottleneck shifts to Fryer (longest single task, always busy).
First-unit flow time still , but ongoing units gated every .
Capacity per 4-hr shift:
.Weekly capacity (3 days): samosas.
Strategic Question – Should We Hire Ash?
Pros
Meets & exceeds forecast (66>55) giving sales upside.
Shorter customer wait times.
Allows founder to take breaks / avoid burnout.
ConsAdded labor cost; profitability depends on unit margin.
Risk of overproduction if sales remain at conservative level.
Must analyze contribution margin:
• If unit margin (\text{Price} - \text{Variable Cost})<0, higher volume increases total loss!
→ Finance session on Monday will compute exact breakeven & ROI.
When NOT to Elevate the Bottleneck
Additional capacity may be too expensive (e.g., $5,000 espresso machine).
Scarcity of skilled labor/unique IP (expert scientist, proprietary tech).
Demand uncertainty – investing upfront may create unused capacity.
Conceptual Takeaways
Forecasts should always be stress-tested against operational reality.
Bottleneck dictates system output; relieving it can transform capacity.
Cross-functional integration (Marketing–Ops–Finance) prevents costly mismatches (e.g.
Cybertruck price fiasco).Just-in-Time vs Buffering involves trade-offs among freshness, risk & capital tied up in WIP.
Never accept raw numbers without interpretation (the “0.6 samosa” lesson).
Decision to expand capacity (hire, buy equipment) must include cost/benefit, not just technical feasibility.
Next Steps / Upcoming Class Links
Monday’s Finance lecture will:
• Quantify unit contribution margin.
• Calculate breakeven volumes with & without Ash.
• Evaluate ROI of hiring decision.Catch up on asynchronous Top-Hat modules; revisit process-mapping terminology.