8-15
conservatism
edmund burke
1730-1797
thomas paine
1739-1789
burkes conception of politics as a tradition extenging across generations
politics sgould be seen as a tradition extending across generations
emphasziing the continuity and organic nature of society
gratitude as a political virtue
how the moral quality of gratitude can influence political; behavior, relationships and social cohesion
burkes criticisms of revolutionaries as political actors
radical disregard for tradition
disrespect of tradition
argues that tradition & historical and continuity are essential fot the stability and cohesion of society
rejection of gradual reform
change should be gradual and organic
ignorance of human nature
unintended consequences of revolution
revolutions as a threat ti social stability
burkes argument from liited knowledge for gradual reform
centererd around idea that human beings have limited understands for complexities of society
burked argument that the french revolution would lead to a military dictatorship
rooted in his deep skepticism about the revolutions ability to establish stable and just political order
liberal egalitariaism
john rawls
to balance freedom, equality and fairnoess with a democratic society
the original position
hypothetical social contract
establish principles of justice for the basic structure
individuals come together to decide rules and principles of justice thatll govern society
the veil of ignorance
why? so theyll be unbiased
thought experiment designed to ensure fairness in the principle of justice that govern a society by removing personal biases and self-interest
applied in the original position
refrelective equilibrium
refers to a state of coherence of balance bwtweeb our moral principles, theories and particular judgement
process: adjustng and referring these elements to achieve consistency across them
the principles of justice
1. equal basic liberties
2. economic inequalities must be
reasonably expected to be everyones advantage
offices and positions are open to all
the baseline of equality
refers to initial or default condition of equality among individuals before any deviations or inequalities are justified
seves as a reference point, whether inequalities are acceptable or ned rectification
formal equality of opportunity v fair equality of opportunity
formal:
requires that no individual faces discrimination or barriers based on irrelevant factors such as racem genderm religion or social status
fair:
addresses systemic barriers and ensure that all individyakls have qeuinely equal chance to compete for opportunities
rawls definition of injustice
deviations from the principles of justice that rational individuals would agree upon under fair conditions such as the original position and the veil of ignorance
the difference principle
social and economic inequalities are only permisable if they benefit the leat advantaged members of society
rawls critique of preinstitutional desert
states: individuals deserve rewards or benefits baseddf solely on their natural abilities or efforctts prior to the establishment of societal rules
critiques bc its flawed bc what individuals “deserve” depends on social instiutions that determine and allocate rewards
pareto argument for inequality
inequality cant be justified if it leads to improvements in the well-being of everyone in society, including the least advantaged, without making anyone worse off
libertarianism
robert nozick
1838-2002
libertarianism
role of govt is to protect individual rights
- rights vs + rights
-:
requires others to refrain from interfering with individual actions
rights to non-interference
+:
requires others, especially the state to take action or provide something in orfer to fulfill or ensure the rights of an individual
rights involve entitlements to certain goods
libertarian conception of equality as equal negative rights
all have natural rights and their all negative rights= equality
emphasized equality in terms of freedom from interference
ensures individuals have equal negative rights, no one should be subject to coercion, force or interference
entitlement theory
offers an alternative to theories of distributive justice
individuals are entitled to their holdings, if they acquire them justly
role of state is to ensure that holdings are acquired justly and transferred justly
historical principle of justice v patterned principle
historical:
focus on peoccess on how holdings are acquired anf transferred
asks: how did an individual come to hold what they have ?
patterned
distribution of goods and resources
focuses on specific outcome or pattern society should achieve
asks: what distribution should society aim for?
nozick critique of baseline of equality
rejection of pattened principles of justice
focusses on achieving a particular distribution or pattern if wealth and resources, such as equality or a specific standard of living
nozick argument against socialism
focusses on violation of human rights and the coercive nature of state enforced redistribution
nozick appeak to formula of humanity
respecting:
indiviual autonomy
property tights
non interference
individual rights
wilt c. argument
how voluntary exchange lead to unequal outcomes
outcomes are just bc they result from individual autonomous choices
nozick objection against fair and equal opportunity
egalitarian approaches to justice often include coercive redistribution and violation of individual rights
the alcoholic father
should the child be compensated for the fathers neglect?
rawls: yes
nozick: fuck no
housing policy
collective property vs common property
collective
ownership of property by a group, community, or society as a whole
managed collectivrlu of trn by governing body, cooperations or state institutions
common
resource or property owned collectivrly by a community,
but where each memeber of the community has access to and can use the property
no centra authority managing the property
individuals have more direct control over its use and maintenance
housing vouchers
form if housing assistance
rent control
govt imposes regulations that kunut the ant a landlord can charge for renting out property
economists believes it causes housing shortages or makes them worse
economies of agglomeration
economic benefits thar businesses and individualsexxxperience by being located next to eachotehr or in a concentrated geographic area or an “agglomerated” space
why homeowners would be likely to support strict local building regulations
protecting property rights
“maintaining” neighborhoods character
waldrons argument that the homeless lack negative freedom
homeless = denying negative freedom
possible advantages of housing vouchers
increasing housing choices
access to better neighborhoods
reduced concentration of poverty
tabarroks case against rent control
decreased incdentived for landlords to maintain poverty
reduced supply of rental housing
black markets
misallocation of housing
consequences of zoning and other building regulations
hinder economic growth, exacerbate inequality, and limit housing availability
reduced housing supply and increased prices
segregation and inequality
democracy
platos theory of the 3 parts of the soul
reason:
rational part is responsible for reasoning, wisdom, and the pursuit of truth
what is god?
middle part:
spirited part is responsible for courage, honor and emotion such as anger and indignation
ally to reason
ensures decisions and resists temptations
appetitive part
governs basic desires and bodily pleasures such as hunger, thirst and sexual desires
seeks gratification and material satisfaction
the oligarchic city and the oligarchic person
city:
when a timocratic government transfers into a government dominated by wealth
person:
individuals who correspond to the oligarchic city whose whose life is dominated by the desire of wealth and material success
disadvantages of oligarchy
society inequality
moral decay
instability
mills utilitarian arguments of democracy:
security of interests:
democracy is the best system for ensuring that the interest of all citizens are protected
moral education:
educational role of democracy in developing the oral and intellectial capactities of citizens
effects on character:
mill believes that democratic institutions posituively shape the character of individuals, leading to a more enlightened and vitreous citizenry
argument that deocracues are richer; why this fails to support democracy
made to support democratic gobernancem as wealthier nations can provide better living standards, public services and economic opportunities
fails: correlation isnt causation
armartya sen on democracy and famice
democracy plays a crucial role in preventing famine
democracy and massacres
role is to protect people, history proves otherwise… why?
accountability or lack there of
respect for human rights
public debate and consent
democratic peace theory
the democratic peace thory
argues that democracues are less likely to go to war with one another compared to conflicts involving at least one non-democratic state
democracy and dictatorship
the democratic city and the democratic person
city:
characterized by its emphasis on individual freedom and equality
citizens pursue desires and interests with minimal interference
person:
emerges from a rejection of the oligarchic parents rigid focus on wealth and discipline
embraces freedom, allowing desires and appetites guide their decisions
necessary v unnecessary desires; lawless unnecessary desires
necessary:
those that are essential for survival and basic well being
natural and indispensable
unnecessary:
goes beyond what is necessary for survival and basic well-being
associated w luxuries and excess
lawless:
refers to desires that not only go beyinbg necessary but also violate moral or legal boundaries
unchecked may kead to harmful or immoral behavior
disordered
the tyrannical city and the tyrannical person
city:
when a democratic city, characterized by excessive freedom and equality, becomes unstabled
person:
final stage of degradation within the soul
born out of the democratic person, marked by excessive indulgence of desires and lack of self-control
platos cxoncern about democracy
excessive freedom and lack of order
transition from democracy to tyranny
rule of the “many” vs rule of the “wise”
equality and democracy: a misunderstanding
tyrannical individuals: reflection of the tyrannical city
platos ship & animal-tamer analogy
both explain why philosophers, especially philosopher kings, are most qualified to rule a city
ship-owner- voters
ship- city (or society as a whole)
sailors- politicians (and political constultants, etc)
the captain- expert/philosopher
the isolated slave owner
conflict btwn certain conceptions of liberty and the potential consequences of liberty without using constraints
nonviolent resistance
montgomery bus boycott
montgomery alabama 12/55-12/56
segregation on public busses
morgav v virginia
case dealting w segregation on interstate travel (busses)
6 to 1 in favor of morgan
segregation laws were deemed as unconstitutional
the freedom rides
series of civil rights protests in 1961
the albany movement
albany georgia
one of first large-scale attempts to integrate a southern city using nonviolent protests
birmingham
birmingham alabama 1965
one of the most significantinfluencial events in american civil rights movement
the civil rights act of 1964
major victory if the civil rights movement
principled vs strategic nonviolence
principled
based in a moral commitment to non violence, regardless of circumstances
strategic
focused on achieving specific political or social objetives using nonviolent tactics, bc theyre seen as more effective/practical in achieving goals
kings views on the nature of nonviolent action
rooted in his moral and religious beliefs
moral jiu-jitsu
technique of nonviolent resistence where an individual or group uses an oppressors aggression or violence as a tool to expose the moral failings or injustices of the oppressors actions
black power critique of nonviolence
innefectiveness of nonviolence
selfe dense/ black pride
seperation anf black autonomy
kings response
morality
self respect
disagreement about violence
realism about progress
advantages of nonviolent resistance
moral high ground
wder appeal
legitimacy and political impact
disruption without violence
attracts media attention