Notes: Research Methods & Statistics of Psychology (Chapter 2)
Theory, Hypothesis, and Research
- Science is a methodology, not a discipline.
- Essential elements: Theory, Hypothesis, Research.
- THEORY: Explanation based on observations.
- HYPOTHESIS: Prediction based on the theory.
- RESEARCH: Test of the hypothesis; data are collected to evaluate the hypothesis.
- Data either support the theory (leading to refinement) or refute the theory (leading to revision or discard).
Scientific Theory
- A system of ideas that interrelates facts and concepts, summarizes existing data, and predicts future observations.
- A good theory must be falsifiable.
- Operational definitions specify the procedures used to produce or measure something.
Conceptual Level vs Concrete Level
- Concepts (conceptual level): Hypothesized relationships among abstract ideas (e.g., Aggression, Frustration).
- Concrete Level (operational definitions): Translate concepts into measurable variables (e.g., Number of times a child strikes a punching bag).
What Types of Studies Are Used in Psychological Research?
- Three main designs: descriptive, correlational, experimental.
- A variable is a quantity that can be measured or manipulated; quantification is central.
Descriptive Studies
- Involve observing and describing behavior.
- Naturalistic observation: passive observation.
- Participant observation: researcher actively involved.
- Developmental designs and observational records.
- Advantages and limitations depend on the method; descriptive data provide rich descriptions but not causation.
Descriptive Studies: Naturalistic Observation
- Observational records describe behavior in natural settings.
- Advantages: rich descriptive data.
- Disadvantages: limited to description; observer bias; anthropomorphic error (attributing human thoughts/feelings to animals).
Correlational Studies
- Researchers do not manipulate variables.
- Do not infer causation from correlations.
- Strengths: ethical and practical for many questions.
- Limitations: cannot establish cause-and-effect relationships.
The Directionality and Third Variable Problems
- Directionality problem: A ↔ B correlation cannot specify which causes which (A → B or B → A).
- Third variable problem: A may be related to B because of an unmeasured variable C.
Ethical Considerations for Correlational Designs
- Some questions (e.g., war trauma) cannot be ethically studied by inducing conditions.
- Correlational designs can address ethically permissible questions about associations.
Making Predictions from Correlational Research
- Example: Depression is strongly related to suicide; correlation informs prediction but not causation.
Experimental Research Method
- To identify cause-and-effect, experiments manipulate one or more independent variables and observe effects on a dependent variable.
- Goal: determine what causes the observed behavioral differences.
Experimental Variables
- INDEPENDENT VARIABLE (IV): Suspected cause.
- DEPENDENT VARIABLE (DV): Outcome/measures of behavior.
- Extraneous Variables: Other factors to be controlled to prevent confounding outcomes.
Groups and Selection
- Experimental Group: experiences the IV manipulation.
- Control Group: does not receive the IV manipulation.
- Random sampling: Every person in the population has an equal chance of selection.
- Random assignment: Each participant has an equal chance of being in either group.
- Important for generalizability and reducing biases.
Population and Sampling
- Population: the group you want to study (e.g., U.S. college students).
- Sampling methods:
- Random sample: taken at random from the population.
- Convenience sample: taken from readily available subgroups.
- Random assignment ensures comparability between groups.
The Psychology Experiment
- Potential influences on results:
- Research Participant Bias (e.g., placebo effects).
- Placebo Effect: changes due to belief about treatment, not the treatment itself.
- Placebo: fake treatment (e.g., sugar pill).
- Experimental designs vary to offset biases.
Experimental Designs and Bias
- Single-blind: participants unaware of hypotheses or group assignment.
- Double-blind (not explicitly stated in slides, but implied as a fix): neither participants nor researchers know group assignments.
Data Collection Methods in Psychology
- Determine the level of analysis: biological, individual, social, cultural.
- Methods must fit questions at the chosen level of analysis.
Observational Data and Reactivity
- Observational data: lab vs. natural environment.
- Reactivity: participants altering behavior due to being observed (Hawthorne Effect).
Self-Report Methods
- Ask people about themselves; interactive data collection.
- Important to consider voluntary participation and honesty.
- Example: drug-use surveys (voluntary).
Self-Report Bias
- Social desirability: respondents answer to be viewed favorably.
- Anonymity can reduce this bias.
- Better-than-average effect: overestimating one's own abilities.
- Measure processing of information via task performance.
- Major types:
- Reaction time (speed of response).
- Stimulus judgment (quality of judgment).
- Response accuracy (correct vs. incorrect).
- Advantages: simple, less observer bias.
- Disadvantages: costly/time-consuming; may be less applicable to real-world settings.
Body/Brain Activity Measured Directly
- Polygraph measures physiological indicators related to states.
- Examples: heart rate, perspiration, blood pressure.
Psychophysiological Assessment: Brain Activity
- EEG: measures electrical activity; produces electroencephalograms.
- ERP: averages brain responses across trials to a stimulus.
Brain Imaging Modalities
- PET: tracks metabolic activity via radioactive glucose.
- MRI: strong magnetic field to visualize brain tissue.
Animal Research
- Important data obtained from nonhuman animals.
- Some research cannot be ethically conducted with humans; animals provide essential insights.
How Do We Know If We’re Wrong or Right?
- Hypothesis testing requires falsifiability.
- Statistics determine whether results are likely due to chance.
- Findings with low probability under the null are deemed statistically significant.
Types of Statistics in Psychology
- Descriptive Statistics: summarize data; describe distributions of scores.
- Inferential Statistics: determine if observed differences reflect population differences beyond chance.
Descriptive Statistics: Summary of the Data
- Two key ideas: Central Tendency and Variability.
- Central Tendency measures: mean, median, mode.
Measures of Central Tendency
- Mean: ar{x}
- Median: middle value when data are ordered.
- Mode: most frequently occurring value.
Mean and Its Sensitivity
- The mean ar{x} is sensitive to extreme values; outliers can skew the distribution.
Measures of Variability
- Range: difference between highest and lowest scores.
- Standard Deviation: spread of scores around the mean; denote extSDextorσ.
Normal Distribution
- Describes many natural phenomena; characterized by the mean and standard deviation.
- Percentages around the mean follow a predictable pattern related to extSD:
- About 68% within ar{x} \, ext{±} \, ext{SD}
- About 95% within ar{x} \, ext{±} \, 2\text{SD}
- About 99.7% within ar{x} \, ext{±} \, 3\text{SD}
Inferential Statistics
- Used to determine if observed differences between sample means reflect population differences or are due to chance.
- Findings labeled as statistically significant when unlikely due to chance.
Correlation
- Definition: a consistent, systematic relationship between two variables, measured by a correlation coefficient r.
- Possible directions:
- Positive correlation: as one variable increases, the other increases.
- Negative correlation: as one variable increases, the other decreases.
- Zero/no correlation: no linear relationship.
Correlation Examples
- Positive example: more activity often associates with more performance (conceptual example on slides).
- Zero example: hair color and IQ (no reliable relationship).
Coefficient of Correlation (r)
- Range: r∈[−1,1]
- Sign indicates direction; magnitude indicates strength.
- Perfect correlations are rare in psychology.
Interpreting Correlation Strength (rough guide)
- Weak to moderate to strong relationships exist along a spectrum; exact thresholds depend on context.
Critical Thinking
- Ask what evidence would support or refute the claim.
- Gather relevant evidence relevant to the claim.
Four Basic Principles of Critical Thinking
- Evidence quality varies; not all sources are equally reliable.
- Authority or claimed expertise does not automatically make an idea true.
Astrology and Pseudopsychologies
- Encourage testing claims; predictions often rely on uncritical acceptance.
- Probability concepts can help evaluate predictive claims (e.g., base rates).