Unit 12: Beginnings of modern astronomy Modern Astronomy
Unit 12: Beginnings of Modern Astronomy
Course logistics recap
Friday, September 12: no in-person class; a video lecture is provided and should be watched before the in-person class on Monday, September 15.
A short quiz (Quiz Friday, September 12) will be available in Canvas and remains open until the start of class on Monday, September 15 so students can complete it any time before then.
Class focus: Units 12 and 13; review of heliocentric vs geocentric models, retrograde motion, and epicycles; then introduction to the beginnings of modern astronomy with Tycho Brahe.
Assignments: due every Wednesday by 11:59 PM; two types:
Pre-class assignments: unlimited attempts before due date.
Homeworks: two attempts before due date; second attempt can improve score; aim for ~100% on the homework.
Videos and slides are posted in Canvas; will be shown and discussed in class.
Quick recap: geocentric vs heliocentric models and retrograde motion
Geocentric model: Earth at the center; Earth is the center of the solar system; thought to be the center of everything in the cosmos.
Heliocentric model: Sun at the center of the solar system; Earth and other planets orbit the Sun; supported by observations and later physics.
Retrograde motion: planets occasionally move backward (opposite to the usual eastward motion across the sky) before continuing their normal prograde motion.
Epicycles (geocentric explanation): planets move on small circular paths (epicycles) that themselves travel around the deferent; used to account for retrograde motion within a geocentric framework.
In heliocentric theory, retrograde motion arises naturally from the relative motion of Earth and outer planets as Earth overtakes or is overtaken in its orbit; epicycles aren’t required.
Both models can explain eclipses and seasons; historically, both were equally precise for many observations, but the question was which model better represents reality and is simpler (Occam's Razor).
Occam’s Razor (as discussed): the simpler model tends to be preferred; the heliocentric model is simpler because it requires fewer ad hoc constructs (epicycles).
Current consensus: the heliocentric model is correct; the geocentric model with epicycles is not the accurate description of reality.
Parallax as a key observational test
Parallax: apparent shift in the position of nearby stars relative to distant background stars as the Earth orbits the Sun.
Tycho Brahe (1546–1601) built precise instruments and could not detect stellar parallax with the measurements available at the time.
Brahe therefore doubted the heliocentric model and favored a geocentric (or hybrid) view due to the lack of observed parallax.
Parallax concept reminder: if the Earth moves around the Sun, nearby stars should show a tiny annual shift against faraway stars. The lack of detectable parallax at Brahe’s time was a major observational challenge for heliocentrism.
Tycho Brahe and Kepler: data-led shift toward heliocentrism
Brahe’s data were extraordinarily precise for the era and were later used by his student Kepler.
Kepler (using Brahe’s data) demonstrated that planetary orbits are not perfect circles; they are ellipses.
Kepler’s context: though his teacher supported a geocentric view, Kepler’s analysis of Brahe’s data led him to solidly support a heliocentric model with elliptical orbits.
Kepler’s first law: planets move in elliptical orbits with the Sun at a focus
Ellipse geometry basics:
Ellipse has two foci; the Sun sits at one focus in a planet’s orbit.
Semi-major axis: ; semi-minor axis: .
Eccentricity: 2c = 2aeabeeP^2 = A^3.A \,\approx\, 10 \,\text{AU}A^3 = 10^3 = 1000P^2 = 1000\Rightarrow P = \sqrt{1000