Factorial Designs
CENGAGE FACTORIAL DESIGNS STUDY NOTES
INTRODUCTION
Factor: An independent variable (IV) in an experiment, especially those that include two or more IVs.
Factorial Design: A research design that includes two or more factors (IVs).
A two-factor design has two IVs.
A single-factor design has one IV.
Example of a three-factor design: A design represented as has a total of 12 conditions.
STRUCTURE OF A TWO-FACTOR EXPERIMENT
Example with two IVs: Mode of Presentation (Factor A) and Control of Study Time (Factor B).
Structure: The levels of one factor determine the columns, and the levels of the second factor determine the rows.
On Paper:
Fixed Time: Exam scores for participants studying text on paper for a fixed time.
Self-Regulated Time: Exam scores for participants studying text on paper for self-regulated time.
On Screen:
Fixed Time: Exam scores for participants studying text on screen for a fixed time.
Self-Regulated Time: Exam scores for participants studying text on screen for self-regulated time.
COMPLEX DESIGNS
Complex Designs:
Factorial combination of 2 IVs
Example: A design represents 2 IVs, each with 3 levels, resulting in a factorial combination of 9 conditions.
Application of Complex Designs:
Research by Dittmar et al. (2006) examined:
The overall effect of the Version of Picture Book.
Barbie images caused greater body dissatisfaction compared to Emme and neutral images.
An overall increase in body dissatisfaction correlated with advancing grade levels (a natural groups variable).
Notable effects observed for the combined influence of grade and exposure to images.
KNOWLEDGE CHECK 1: INTRODUCTION TO FACTORIAL DESIGNS
Question: How many independent variables are there in a factorial design?
A) 2, B) 3, C) 4, D) 8
Correct Answer: B) 3
TWO-FACTOR DESIGN
Representation: A two-factor design can be represented by a matrix where each cell corresponds to a separate treatment condition (specific combination of factors).
Data Interpretation: The study yields three separate and distinct sets of information regarding how the two factors independently and jointly affect behavior.
MAIN EFFECTS
Definition: Main effect is the mean differences among levels of one factor.
In a two-factor study, two main effects exist: one for each factor.
Example Data Representation:
Overall Means:
On Paper:
Fixed time: ;
Self-regulated time: ;
Overall M = 20.
On Screen:
Fixed time: ;
Self-regulated time: ;
Overall M = 16.
INTERACTION BETWEEN FACTORS
Definition: An interaction occurs when one factor directly influences the effect of another factor.
Example: Drug interactions where one drug alters the effects of another drug (e.g., exaggerating, minimizing, or blocking effects).
Independent Factors: No interaction if factors do not affect each other.
Adjusted Data Means for Interaction:
Example Data Representation:
On Paper:
Fixed time: ;
Self-regulated time: ;
Overall M = 20.
On Screen:
Self-regulated time: ;
Fixed time: ;
Overall M = 16.
ALTERNATIVE VIEWS OF INTERACTION
Interaction exists when the effects of one factor depend on the levels of the second factor.
Graphing Results: Non-parallel lines on a graph indicate an interaction.
Statistical Testing: A statistical test is required to determine if the interaction is significant.
INTERPRETING MAIN EFFECTS AND INTERACTIONS
Statistical Analysis: Significant effects identified by statistical analysis demand caution in interpretation.
Average Distortion: Main effects can give a distorted view of overall outcomes as they are averages which may not depict individual results accurately.
INDEPENDENCE OF MAIN EFFECTS AND INTERACTIONS
A two-factor study enables evaluation of:
Mean differences from the main effect of factor A.
Mean differences from the main effect of factor B.
Mean differences from the interaction of factors A and B.
KNOWLEDGE CHECK 2: INTERPRETING MAIN EFFECTS AND INTERACTIONS
Question: Possible outcomes from a factorial design?
A) Two main effects and an interaction.
B) Three main effects and no interaction.
C) Four main effects and an interaction.
BETWEEN-SUBJECTS AND WITHIN-SUBJECTS DESIGN
Between-Subjects Design:
Requires a large number of participants; individual differences may confound the results.
Avoids order effects.
Within-Subjects Design:
Each participant undergoes numerous treatments; often time-consuming and risks attrition.
Increases the risk of testing effects but only requires one group of participants, thus eliminating individual differences.
MIXED DESIGNS
Definition: Mixed designs incorporate both within- and between-subjects variables.
Application: Common in factorial studies where one factor is between-subjects and the other is within-subjects, often used when a factor threatens validity.
EXPERIMENTAL AND NONEXPERIMENTAL OR QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH STRATEGIES
Experimental Design: All factors are true independent variables manipulated by the researcher.
Non-Experimental Design: All factors are quasi-independent variables that are not manipulated, but are still referred to as factors.
COMBINED STRATEGIES: EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL
Involves two different research strategies within the same factorial design.
One factor acts as a true IV (experimental strategy) and the second factor is a quasi-independent variable (nonexperimental or quasi-experimental strategy).
Types: May include preexisting participant characteristics or time.
PRETEST–POSTTEST CONTROL GROUP DESIGNS
Example: A two-factor mixed design where:
One factor (treatment/control) is a between-subjects factor.
Other factor (pretest–posttest) is a within-subjects factor.
Data Representation:
Treatment Group: Pretest and posttest scores for participants receiving treatment.
Control Group: Pretest and posttest scores for those not receiving treatment.
HIGHER-ORDER FACTORIAL DESIGNS
Concept: Extends the basic two-factor design to more complex designs involving three or more factors (higher-order factorial designs).
Three-Factor Design: Evaluates main effects for all three factors, and interprets higher-order interactions similarly to two-factor interactions.
Note: Designs with more than three factors can yield complex and difficult-to-analyze results.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FACTORIAL DESIGNS
Statistical analysis depends on whether:
Factors are between-subjects, within-subjects, or mixed.
Standard Practices:
Compute mean for each treatment condition (cell)
Utilize ANOVA to assess statistical significance of mean differences.
EXPANDING AND REPLICATING A PREVIOUS STUDY
Replication: Repeating a prior study using the same IVs exactly.
Expansion: Introducing a second factor through new conditions or participant characteristics to assess generalizability of previously reported effects to new populations or situations.
REDUCING VARIANCE IN BETWEEN-SUBJECTS DESIGNS
Purpose: Use a participant variable as a second factor to reduce within-group variance.
Outcome: Decreases individual differences within each group without sacrificing external validity.
WHY WORRY ABOUT ALL THESE INTERACTIONS?
Most outcomes in psychological studies emerge from interactions rather than main effects, indicating a need for careful analysis of interdependencies.
IDENTIFYING FACTORIAL DESIGNS IN EMPIRICAL JOURNAL ARTICLES
Method Section: Details study design.
Factorial Notation: Presented as ___ x ____ x ____.
Results Section: Evaluates significance of main effects and interactions, references significance or p values, and discusses MANOVA and F-tests.
IDENTIFYING FACTORIAL DESIGNS IN POPULAR PRESS ARTICLES
Look for phrases indicating interactions, such as "it depends" or "only when."
Be alert for mentions of participant variables (e.g., age, gender, ethnicity).