Factorial Designs

CENGAGE FACTORIAL DESIGNS STUDY NOTES

INTRODUCTION

  • Factor: An independent variable (IV) in an experiment, especially those that include two or more IVs.

  • Factorial Design: A research design that includes two or more factors (IVs).

    • A two-factor design has two IVs.

    • A single-factor design has one IV.

    • Example of a three-factor design: A design represented as (2imes3imes2)(2 imes 3 imes 2) has a total of 12 conditions.

STRUCTURE OF A TWO-FACTOR EXPERIMENT

  • Example with two IVs: Mode of Presentation (Factor A) and Control of Study Time (Factor B).

    • Structure: The levels of one factor determine the columns, and the levels of the second factor determine the rows.

    • On Paper:

      • Fixed Time: Exam scores for participants studying text on paper for a fixed time.

      • Self-Regulated Time: Exam scores for participants studying text on paper for self-regulated time.

    • On Screen:

      • Fixed Time: Exam scores for participants studying text on screen for a fixed time.

      • Self-Regulated Time: Exam scores for participants studying text on screen for self-regulated time.

COMPLEX DESIGNS

  • Complex Designs:

    • Factorial combination of 2 IVs

    • Example: A (3imes3)(3 imes 3) design represents 2 IVs, each with 3 levels, resulting in a factorial combination of 9 conditions.

  • Application of Complex Designs:

    • Research by Dittmar et al. (2006) examined:

    • The overall effect of the Version of Picture Book.

    • Barbie images caused greater body dissatisfaction compared to Emme and neutral images.

    • An overall increase in body dissatisfaction correlated with advancing grade levels (a natural groups variable).

    • Notable effects observed for the combined influence of grade and exposure to images.

KNOWLEDGE CHECK 1: INTRODUCTION TO FACTORIAL DESIGNS

  • Question: How many independent variables are there in a 2imes2imes22 imes 2 imes 2 factorial design?

    • A) 2, B) 3, C) 4, D) 8

    • Correct Answer: B) 3

TWO-FACTOR DESIGN

  • Representation: A two-factor design can be represented by a matrix where each cell corresponds to a separate treatment condition (specific combination of factors).

  • Data Interpretation: The study yields three separate and distinct sets of information regarding how the two factors independently and jointly affect behavior.

MAIN EFFECTS

  • Definition: Main effect is the mean differences among levels of one factor.

    • In a two-factor study, two main effects exist: one for each factor.

  • Example Data Representation:

    • Overall Means:

    • On Paper:

      • Fixed time: M=22M = 22;

      • Self-regulated time: M=18M = 18;

      • Overall M = 20.

    • On Screen:

      • Fixed time: M=18M = 18;

      • Self-regulated time: M=14M = 14;

      • Overall M = 16.

INTERACTION BETWEEN FACTORS

  • Definition: An interaction occurs when one factor directly influences the effect of another factor.

    • Example: Drug interactions where one drug alters the effects of another drug (e.g., exaggerating, minimizing, or blocking effects).

    • Independent Factors: No interaction if factors do not affect each other.

  • Adjusted Data Means for Interaction:

    • Example Data Representation:

    • On Paper:

      • Fixed time: M=20M = 20;

      • Self-regulated time: M=20M = 20;

      • Overall M = 20.

    • On Screen:

      • Self-regulated time: M=20M = 20;

      • Fixed time: M=12M = 12;

      • Overall M = 16.

ALTERNATIVE VIEWS OF INTERACTION

  • Interaction exists when the effects of one factor depend on the levels of the second factor.

  • Graphing Results: Non-parallel lines on a graph indicate an interaction.

  • Statistical Testing: A statistical test is required to determine if the interaction is significant.

INTERPRETING MAIN EFFECTS AND INTERACTIONS

  • Statistical Analysis: Significant effects identified by statistical analysis demand caution in interpretation.

  • Average Distortion: Main effects can give a distorted view of overall outcomes as they are averages which may not depict individual results accurately.

INDEPENDENCE OF MAIN EFFECTS AND INTERACTIONS

  • A two-factor study enables evaluation of:

    • Mean differences from the main effect of factor A.

    • Mean differences from the main effect of factor B.

    • Mean differences from the interaction of factors A and B.

KNOWLEDGE CHECK 2: INTERPRETING MAIN EFFECTS AND INTERACTIONS

  • Question: Possible outcomes from a 2imes22 imes 2 factorial design?

    • A) Two main effects and an interaction.

    • B) Three main effects and no interaction.

    • C) Four main effects and an interaction.

BETWEEN-SUBJECTS AND WITHIN-SUBJECTS DESIGN

  • Between-Subjects Design:

    • Requires a large number of participants; individual differences may confound the results.

    • Avoids order effects.

  • Within-Subjects Design:

    • Each participant undergoes numerous treatments; often time-consuming and risks attrition.

    • Increases the risk of testing effects but only requires one group of participants, thus eliminating individual differences.

MIXED DESIGNS

  • Definition: Mixed designs incorporate both within- and between-subjects variables.

  • Application: Common in factorial studies where one factor is between-subjects and the other is within-subjects, often used when a factor threatens validity.

EXPERIMENTAL AND NONEXPERIMENTAL OR QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH STRATEGIES

  • Experimental Design: All factors are true independent variables manipulated by the researcher.

  • Non-Experimental Design: All factors are quasi-independent variables that are not manipulated, but are still referred to as factors.

COMBINED STRATEGIES: EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL

  • Involves two different research strategies within the same factorial design.

    • One factor acts as a true IV (experimental strategy) and the second factor is a quasi-independent variable (nonexperimental or quasi-experimental strategy).

    • Types: May include preexisting participant characteristics or time.

PRETEST–POSTTEST CONTROL GROUP DESIGNS

  • Example: A two-factor mixed design where:

    • One factor (treatment/control) is a between-subjects factor.

    • Other factor (pretest–posttest) is a within-subjects factor.

  • Data Representation:

    • Treatment Group: Pretest and posttest scores for participants receiving treatment.

    • Control Group: Pretest and posttest scores for those not receiving treatment.

HIGHER-ORDER FACTORIAL DESIGNS

  • Concept: Extends the basic two-factor design to more complex designs involving three or more factors (higher-order factorial designs).

  • Three-Factor Design: Evaluates main effects for all three factors, and interprets higher-order interactions similarly to two-factor interactions.

  • Note: Designs with more than three factors can yield complex and difficult-to-analyze results.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FACTORIAL DESIGNS

  • Statistical analysis depends on whether:

    • Factors are between-subjects, within-subjects, or mixed.

  • Standard Practices:

    • Compute mean for each treatment condition (cell)

    • Utilize ANOVA to assess statistical significance of mean differences.

EXPANDING AND REPLICATING A PREVIOUS STUDY

  • Replication: Repeating a prior study using the same IVs exactly.

  • Expansion: Introducing a second factor through new conditions or participant characteristics to assess generalizability of previously reported effects to new populations or situations.

REDUCING VARIANCE IN BETWEEN-SUBJECTS DESIGNS

  • Purpose: Use a participant variable as a second factor to reduce within-group variance.

  • Outcome: Decreases individual differences within each group without sacrificing external validity.

WHY WORRY ABOUT ALL THESE INTERACTIONS?

  • Most outcomes in psychological studies emerge from interactions rather than main effects, indicating a need for careful analysis of interdependencies.

IDENTIFYING FACTORIAL DESIGNS IN EMPIRICAL JOURNAL ARTICLES

  • Method Section: Details study design.

  • Factorial Notation: Presented as ___ x ____ x ____.

  • Results Section: Evaluates significance of main effects and interactions, references significance or p values, and discusses MANOVA and F-tests.

IDENTIFYING FACTORIAL DESIGNS IN POPULAR PRESS ARTICLES

  • Look for phrases indicating interactions, such as "it depends" or "only when."

  • Be alert for mentions of participant variables (e.g., age, gender, ethnicity).