Introduction
Law, the rule of law, and property provide a necessary foundation for successful modern business and set maximum conditions for generating “wealth of nations”
Law and Regulations are Fundamental Foundations for Business
Companies in the US must:
Be aware of the legal and regulatory landscape
Take steps to ensure full compliance with the law to avoid civil and criminal liability
Lawyers play a positive role in corporate boards
Law
Rules established by the state and backed up by enforcement
Formal social force
Adequate enforcement institutions are necessary to maintain order in society
What is Law?
Consists of rules that regulate conduct of individuals, businesses, and other organizations in society
Intended to protect people and their property from unwanted interference from others
Forbids individuals from engaging in undesirable activities
Rule of Law
Laws are made generally (apply to various groups in the same way) and equally applicable (apply to all or most members of society)
Functions of Law
Keeping the peace, shaping moral standards, promoting social justice, maintaining the status quo, facilitating orderly change, facilitating planning, providing a basis for compromise, maximizing individual freedom
Facilitating planning
Well-designed commercial laws allow businesses to plan their activities, allocate their resources, and assess their risks
Maximizing individual freedom
The rights of freedom of speech, religion, and the association granted by the First Amendment to the us Constitution
Property
Property means Ownership
Property: the legal right to exclude or keep others from interfering
Ownership: Private exclusive rights in resources
Property - Broad Sense
Property is the central concept underlying Western legal systems
Classifications of Law Overview
Civil Law - Common Law
Public Law - Private Law
Civil Law - Criminal Law
Civil Law Common Law Classification
Two Major Legal Systems
Civil Law
Law based on statutory codification of law
Romano-Germanic
Common Law
Law based on written judicial decisions that establish precedent
Anglo - American\
Civil Law
Examples
Continental Europe
Latin America
Japan
Former French Colonies
Spain
Common Law
Examples
United Kingdom
Canada
Jamaica
New Zealand
United States
India
History of American Law
English system of law was adopted as system of jurisprudence in early American colonies
Foundation based on which American judges developed common law in America
English Common Law
Law Courts
Uniform system of law
Relief available was monetary award for damages
Courts of Chancery (equity courts)
Formed to surpass limited remedies of law courts
Equitable remedies shaped to fit each situation
Merchant Courts
Solved commercial disputes based on trade practices and usage
Adoption of English Common Law in America
All states except Louisiana base their legal systems on the English common law
Louisiana bases its law on the civil law
Influence of its French heritage (Napoleonic Code)
Public Law Private Law Classification
Public Law
Law dealing with the regulation of society
Constitutional law
Administrative law
Criminal Law
Private Law
Law dealing with issues that concern private resource relationships
Property Law
Contract Law
Tort Law
Civil Law Criminal Law Classification
Civil Law
Law dealing with private rights between people
Torts & contracts
Damages
No punishment
Criminal Law
Law dealing with offenses against society at large
Prosecuted by gov’t
Results in punishment
Substantive Law Procedural Law Classification
Substantive Law
The part of the law creating, defining, and regulating rights, duties, and powers
The what
Procedural law
The part of the law telling the methods/means for having rights or duties enforced
The how
Sources of Law
Constitutions
Set forth fundamental rights
Describe and empower government
Set forth limitations on power
Legislation
Laws by Congress or state legislature and local ordinances
Administrative Regulation
Rule or order by federal, state, or local regulatory agencies
Judicial Decisions or Case Law
Decisions by courts that interpret and enforce laws or the common law
Sources of Law in the US
US Constitution
“Supreme law of the land”
Established structure of federal government
Legislative branch
Executive branch
Judicial branch
Enumerates federal powers
Reserves all other powers to states
State Constitutions
Codified Law: Statues and Ordinances
The US Congress enacts federal statues
State legislatures enact state statues
Municipalities and local government bodies enact ordinances
Federal laws preempt state and local laws
Executive Orders
Issued by the president and state governors
Ex-order requiring federal agencies to buy more hybrid vehicles
Ex order allowing oil drilling on federal land
Power derived from express delegation from legislative branch or implied from constitutional powers
Regulations and Orders of Administrative Agencies
Empowered by legislative and executive branches of government
Adopt rules and regulations
Enforce statues
Hear and decide disputes
Many agencies regulate business
Ex SEC, FTC, DOT
Judicial Decisions
Courts decide controversies
Judicial decisions (called “opinion”) usually state the rationale used by the court in reaching that decision; foundation of the “common law”
Doctrine of Stare Decisis
Based on the common law tradition, past court decisions become precedent for deciding future cases
Lower courts follow the precedent established by higher courts
Dobbs overrules Roe - 50 years
The first time they took away a constitutional right
Doctrine of Stare Decisis (continued)
Both federal and state courts must follow the precedents established by US Supreme Court decisions
Courts in one state or local jurisdiction are not bound by precedent of another state or local jurisdiction but may look at it for guidance
Case Law
Advantages
Stare Decisis
Judges follow precedents
Gives certainty & predictability
Flexibility (power to depart from or change precedent when warranted - Brown v Board)
Disadvantages
Volume of cases
Conflicting precedents
Conflicts of Law
Priority of Law in the US
The US Constitution and treaties take precedence over all other laws
Federal statutes take precedence over federal regulations
Valid federal law takes precedence over conflicting state or local law
The doctrine of federal “preemption”
State constitutions rank as the highest state law
State statutes take precedence over state regulations
Valid state law takes precedence over local laws/ordinances
Brown v Board of Education
Decision challenged separate but equal doctrine as it applied to public elementary and high schools
A unanimous Supreme Court reversed prior precedent and held that the separate but equal doctrine violated:
The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution
After the decision, it took court orders and US Army enforcement to integrate public schools in the country
Case 1.2: Voting Rights Act
Case
Shelby County, Texas v Holder
133 S.Ct 2612 (2013) Supreme Court of the United States
Issue
Is the coverage provision of the Voting Rights Act that singles out several states for the federal clearance requirement constitutional?
Legal Sanctions
Methods used by law enforcement officials and courts to encourage or force compliance with the law
Remedy: Right of an individual to take another person's resources as the person failed to meet the requirements of the law
Sanctions for Criminal Conduct
Crime: Public wrong against society
Punishments
Death, imprisonment, fine, removal, disqualification
Sanctions for Breach of Contract
Breach of contract: Failure to perform a contractual promise
Remedies
Damages (money), compensatory, consequential damages, specific performance
Tortious Conduct
Tort: Civil wrong (other than breach of contract), intentional, negligence, strict liability
Remedies
Compensatory damages (money), punitive damages (exemplary damages)
Corporations
Businesses chartered by the state to do business as legal persons
Owned by shareholders
The board of directors runs the business
Managers are in charge of day-to-day business operations
Food for Thought
Corporate governance, in a property-based environment, requires a viable court system
In the Federal System, the Lowest Level Trial Court is:
Circuit court
District Court
Supreme Court
Chancery Court
Long Arm Jurisdiction:
Allows state court to assert jurisdiction over non-resident
Increases the geographic scope of court jurisdiction
Does not apply in every state
Arises under common law
Court Systems in US
Two major systems:
Federal court system
Court systems of the 50 states and the District of Columbia
State courts resolve more than 95% percent of all lawsuits
Federal and Most State Court Systems
Trial courts → Appellate Courts → Supreme Courts
Subject Matter Jurisdiction - Power over Particular Issues
State Court Systems
Supreme Court
Intermediate appellate courts
Limited jurisdiction trial courts
General jurisdiction trial courts
State Courts Sources of Authority
State constitution
State laws
Court rules of procedure
Typical State Court System
Subject Matter Jurisdiction
Power over the issues involved in the case
Jurisdiction can be limited to a subject matter or area in which the parties live
Probate courts - Deal with wills and estates of deceased persons
Traffic courts - Deal with traffic violations
State Court Systems (continued)
Limited jurisdiction trial courts
Hear matters of a specialized or limited nature
Traffic court, juvenile court, justice of the peace court, probate court, family law court, misdemeanor criminal court, small claims court
General-jurisdiction trial courts
Hear cases of a general nature that are not within the jurisdiction of limited jurisdiction courts
Real estate, business law, contracts, negotiable instruments
Record and store testimony evidence
Intermediate Appellate Courts
Hear appeals from trial courts
Review trial court record to determine if there have been any errors at trial that would require reversal or modification
No new testimony or evidence
Highest State Court
In most states called “supreme court”
Hears appeals from intermediate state courts and certain trial courts
No new testimony or evidence
Decisions of state supreme courts are final unless a question of law is involved that is appealable to the US Supreme Court
Federal Courts
Article III of the Constitution
Reviews
Federal Jurisdiction
Questions of Federal Law
US As Party
State Disagreements
Suits Between Citizens of Different States
Cant be fired and serve for life (makes them unbiased)
Federal Court System
US Supreme Court
US Courts of Appeals
Special Federal Courts
US District Courts
Federal Questions Cases
Federal Questions
US Constitution Issues
Federal Statute Issues
No $ Limit
Diversity of Citizenship
Diversity
Plaintiffs/Defendants - Citizens of Different States
Each claim must be $75,000+
Guard against state court bias
Figure 3.2 - Federal Court System
Federal District Courts
Federal trial courts
General jurisdiction
Receive Evidence
Evaluate Testimony
Impanel Juries
Resolve Disputes
Lifetime Appointments for Judges
US Courts of Appeals
Intermediate appellate courts
Hear appeals from the district courts located in their circuit
13 Circuits (11+DC+Federal)
Lifetime appointments
US Courts of Appeal (continued)
3-judge panel or en banc
Normally odd numbers (3 normally federal)
Review the record of lower courts of administrative agency proceedings
Determine if there has been any error of law that would warrant reversal or modification of the lower court decision
No new evidence or testimony
US Supreme Court
Hears appeals from:
Federal circuit courts of Appeals
Highest state courts
Special federal courts
Conflicting decisions of US Circuit Courts
Decision Becomes “Law of Land” - not subject to review
No new evidence or testimony
9 justices with lifetime appointments
US Supreme Court
Accepts about 100 cases each year out of about 10,000 petitions filed
Decisions can be:
Unanimous (9-0)
Majority (More than 5-4)
Plurality (5-4)
Tie (lower court decision stays the same)
US Supreme Court (continued)
Petition of Certiorari
A petition asking the Supreme Court to hear case
Writ of Certiorari
An official notice that the Supreme Court will review a case
Power of Judicial Review
Judicial review: Ultimate power to invalidate actions by the president or Congress
Judicial restraint: Power should not be used except in unusual cases
Judicial activism: Power should be used when the needs of society justify its use
Judicial Restraint
Philosophy is referred as strict constructionism or judicial abstention
Followers favor a very limited role for the courts in system of government
Belief that change in society should result from the political process
Supporters take a pragmatic approach to litigation
Judicial Activism
Supporters favor a more expansive role for courts in system of government
Activists are value-oriented and policy-directed
Courts are more result-conscious and place less reliance on precedent
Standing to Sue - Article III
Plaintiff must have a stake in the outcome of case
Ex one cannot sue on behalf of a friend who has been injured
In Personam Jurisdiction
Personal jurisdiction exists over any plaintiff who files a lawsuit
Personal jurisdiction exists over defendant who is within the boundaries of the state
Corporation is subject to personal jurisdiction in any state where it is incorporated, has principal office, or does business
In Personam Jurisdiction (continued)
Long-Arm Statue allows state courts to obtain personal jurisdiction over persons or businesses located in another state
Allows summons to be served in other states
Must have minimum contacts with state
Must uphold notions of fair play and substantial justice
Long-Arm Statue (continued)
Exercised over non-residents who have:
Committed torts within the state
Entered into a contract either in the state or that affects the state (internet sales - interactive sites??)
Transacted other businesses in the state that allegedly caused injury to another person
Venue
Court near location in which incident occurred or where parties reside
Several courts may have jurisdiction
Which one is proper venue?
Ex: crime occurred in California, so California court is likely venue
May be change of venue to avoid pretrial publicity that may have prejudiced potential jurors
Forum Selection, Choice-of-Law Clauses
Parties may specify in a contract what court to use (forum selection)
They may also agree on the states or countrys law that will apply to the contract (choice of law)
Jurisdiction in Cyberspace
Case that addressed jurisdiction in cyberspace was Zippo Manufacturing Company v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc
It established a test for determining when a court has jurisdiction over the owner or operator of an interactive, semiinteractive, or passive website
Introduction
An impartial enforcement and dispute resolution process is essential to any system that preserves private property interests
To conduct business and enforce rights, we need a process to resolve disputes
The Document that Starts a Lawsuit is:
Answer
Counterclaim
Complaint
Reply
Most Companies Prefer Arbitration as Opposed to Court Litigation
True
False
Getting Into Court
Need all three to get into court
Subject Matter Juridiction
Standing to Sue
Personal Jurisdiction
Parties
Plantiff: Party who files civil action
Defendant: Party sued by the plaintiff or person against whom a criminal charge is filed by state
Third-party defendant: Parties bought in by the defendant to complete the determination of a controversy
Phases of Litigation
Pleadings (complaint, answer/counterclaim, reply)
Pre-trial (motions to dismiss/summary judgment)
Trial
Post-trial(JNOV, motion for new trial)
Appeal
Pleadings
Complaint
Answer
Counterclaim
Reply
Complaint and Summons
Plaintiff files complaint to start suit
Lists parties
Alleges facts and laws violated
Prayer for relief (ask for damages, injunction, etc)
Court issues Summons
Directs defendant to appear and answer within a specified time (ex 21 days)
Answer
Defendant must file an Answer
Admitting or denying fact allegations
Stating affirmative defenses
If no answer filed, default judgment entered
Counterclaim and Reply
Defendent may sue plaintiff for damages or some other remedy
Pleading is a counterclaim combined with answer
Original plaintiff must file a reply and serve on defendant
Reply is the “answer” to the counterclaim (admit/deny allegations; affirmative defenses)
Intervention and Consolidation
Intervention
Other pirates have interest in lawsuit and become parties
Ex: bank with security interest in property that is subject of lawsuit
Consolidation
Several plaintiffs have filed lawsuits stemming from same situation
Court will consolidate if no undue prejudice
Reduces strain on court system
E-Filing
“Virtual courthouse” allows e-filing of documents and electronic conferences
Available in federal courts
Available in some states
Advantages
Saves paper
Saves time
Easier to track documents
Statute of Limitations
Establishes the period during which plaintiff must bring a lawsuit against a defendant
If a lawsuit is not filed within this time period, plaintiff loses the right to sue
Established for each type of lawsuit
Ex: 2 years for tort claim for personal injuries
4 years for breach of contract under UCC
Discovery
A legal process during which both paries discover/investigate facts of the case from the other party and witnesses prior to trial
Usually involves review of documents (paper and electronically stored information (email) and taking depositions)
Discovery (continued)
Purposes:
Preventing surprise
Allowing parties to thoroughly prepare for trial
Preserving evidence
Saving court time
Promoting settlement of cases
The major forms of discovery are:
Depositions
Interrogatories
Production of documents
Physical and mental examination
Requests for Admissions
Scope of Discovery
Discoverable information: allowable if it will lead to evidence admissible at trial
Evidence admissible at trial
High Cost of Discovery caused by
Time searching for information
Preparing depositions
Copying and shipping costs
Attorneys fees interpreting requests
Depositions
Oral testimony given by party or witness
Under oath
Parties must give depositions
Witnesses can be compelled by subpoena
Evidence preserved by court reporter or on videotape
May be used to impeach testimony at trial
Interrogatories
Written questions submitted by one party to the other
Must be answered and returned within a set time period
Answers affirmed under oath
Production of Documents
Documents that parties request the other side to produce or make available for review
Ex: company records, correspondence, memoranda, email (electronic files)
Discoverable if may lead to admissible evidence
Examinations
If the physical or mental condition of a party are in question, an examination by an expert may be required
Requests for Admissions
Written statements propounded on the opposing party with request to “admit” or “deny” the statement as true
Admissions can be used as evidence at trial
Dismissals and Pretrial Judgements
Pretrial Motion
A motion a party can make to try to dispose of all or part of a lawsuit prior to trial
Motion for judgment on the pleadings
Motion to dismiss (jurisdiction, failure to state a valid legal claim for relief, etc)
Motion for summary judgment
Motion for Judgement on the Pleadings
Even if all the facts presented in the pleadings are taken as true, the party making the motion would win the lawsuit when the proper law is applied to these facts
Motion for Summary Judgment
Motion that asserts that there are no factual disputes to be decided buy the jury
Judge can apply the proper law to the undisputed fact and decide the case without a jury
These motions are supported by affidavits, documents, and deposition testimony
Settlement Conference
Federal court rules and most state rules allow for a pretrial hearing or settlement conference
In judges chambers
At least 95% of all cases settle before trial
Cost-Benefit Analysis of a Lawsuit
Consider:
Probability of winning or losing. Never certain
The amount of money to be won or lost
Lawyers fees and other costs of litigation
Loss of time by managers and other personnel
Effect on relationships and reputation
Aggravation and psychological costs
Other?
Trial
The 7th Amendment guarantees the right to a jury trial in civil cases in federal court
Can be 6-12 jurors
Can be majority and not unanimous
Most state constitutions contain a similar guarantee for state court actions
Trial (continued)
If either party requests a jury, the trial will be by jury
If both parties waive their right to a jury, the trial will be without a jury
Many business disputes are bench trials (ex: chancery court in DE)
Phases of Trial
Jury Selection/ Voir Dire
Opening Statements
Plaintiffs Case
Defendants Case
Rebuttal
Closing Arguments
Jury Instructions
Jury Deliberation
Verdict
Entry of Judgement
Food for Thought…
Supreme Court outlawed racial discrimination in peremptory challenges
Batson v Kentucky, 475 US 79 (1986)
Gender discrimination is banned in the jury selection process
J.E.B. v Alabama Ex Rel. T.B., 511 US 127(1994)
Courts are divided on the issue of banning discrimination based on religion in peremptory challenges
Table 4.1 - Litigating Parties
Burden of Proof
Burden/responsibility of evidence
Criminal cases - beyond a reasonable doubt
Civil cases
Preponderance of evidence
Clear & convincing proof
Post-Trial
Motion for JNOV (judgment notwithstanding the verdict)
Motion for new trial
Appeal
In a civil case
Either party can appeal the trial courts decision
Appeal can be filed once a final judgment is entered
In a criminal case,
Only a defendant can appeal
Appeal (continued)
Appeal is made to the appropriate appellate court (intermediate or supreme) according to timetable set by procedural rules - if miss deadline, appeal dismissed
Appellate court will reverse lower court for errors of law
Will reverse finding of fact only if it is “clearly erroneous”
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Methods of resolving disputes other than litigation
Developed in response to the expense and difficulty of bringing a lawsuit
Arbitration
Common in commercial and labor disputes
Voluntary agreement between parties
Parties choose neutral third party to hear evidence and testimony and decide the case
Arbitrator makes a decision and enters an award
Award is final and binding - no appeal
Key ADR Legislation
Uniform Arbitration Act
Adopted by half of the states
Promotes the arbitration of disputes at the state level
Federal Arbitration Act
Arbitration agreements involving commerce are valid, irrevocable, and enforceable contracts
US Supreme Court - Class Action Waivers
Case
AT&T Mobility LLC v Concepcion
131 S.Ct 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011)
Supreme Court of the United States
Issue
Does the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempt California law that outlaws class action waivers
Mediation and Conciliation
Mediation
Parties choose a neutral third party to assist them negotiate a settlement
Mediator does not make judgment or issue award
If no settlement, no affect on case
Mediation is non-binding and voluntary
Online Dispute Resolution
Register with ADR service provider online
Service provider notifies other party by email
Parties trade offers and counter-offers with aim of settling dispute, or online mediator may be involved
“Chat rooms” used in process
May be quicker, cheaper, and less adversarial than traditional methods
E-Courts and E-Dispute Resolution
E-Courts
Used to settle disputes via the internet
Allow online filing of pleadings, briefs, and documents
Evidence and documents can be scanned for storag
Scheduling and conferences with the judge are held via telephone conferences and e-mail
Food for Thought…
The United States Constitution is the oldest and shortest written Constitution of any major government in the entire world
Functions of the US Constitution
Creates three branches of government (executive, legislative, and judicial) and allocates power to these branches
Protects individual rights by limiting the government's ability to restrict those rights
Marbury v Madison Established The Principle Of…
Stare decisis
Judicial review
Preemption
Supremacy
Table 6.1 - First Fourteen Amendments to the US Constitution
Basic Constitutional Concepts
Federalism and Delegated Powers
2 systems of government that coexist → federal and state, make different rules and overlapping rules and operate at the same time
Delegated powers → designated powers, how much they can regulate
Separation of Powers
Checks and Balances
No part of the government can go rogue
Different levels of government that watch over one another
Federalism and Delegated Powers
US form of government is federalism
Federal government and state governments share powers
Certain powers - the “enumerated powers” - delegated to the federal government by the states
Ex: federal government deals with international affairs, interstate commerce, etc
Federalism and Delegated Powers (continued)
Any powers not specifically delegated to the federal government by the Constitution are reserved to the states (10th Amendment)
State governments are empowered to deal with local affairs
Ex: states handle education, local public safety issues
Congress set a floor but not a ceiling
Separation of Powers
The federal government is separated into 3 branches
Article I - Congress
Article I of the Constitution establishes the legislative branch of government
Bicameral legislature
Senate (every state gets just 2 regardless of size - less biased and more open)
House of Representatives (more population, more representative)
Role to make federal law
Congress spends money and makes law
Article II - President and VP
Artile II of the Constitution establishes the executive branch of government
Provides for the election of President and Vice President (have to be born in the us)
Establishes Electoral College
Role to enforce federal Law
Article III - Federal Courts
Article III of the Constitution establishes the judicial branch of the government
Supreme Court → hold a lifelong position unless impeached
Other federal courts that may be created by the Congress
Role to interpret federal law
Checks and Balances
Built into the Constitution to ensure that no one branch of the government becomes too powerful
“Judicial review” - federal courts have the authority to examine the acts of the other two branches of government and determine whether these acts are constitutional
Marbury v Madison (1803)
Most important supreme case of all time because it created the concept of judicial review
Executive branch can enter into treaties with foreign governments only with the advice and consent of the Senate
Most of what they can do has to be approved by Senate → check and balance
Legislative branch is authorized to create federal courts and determine their jurisdiction and to enact statutes that change judicially made law
Supremacy Clause
Establishes that the federal Constitution, treaties, federal laws, and federal regulations are the supreme law of the land
State and local laws that conflict with valid federal law are unconstitutional
Preemption Doctrine
The concept that federal law takes precedence over state or local law
Congress may expressly provide that federal statue exclusively regulates an area or activity
EX: EPA → one standard on car emissions unless states get specific permission
More frequently, federal, state, and local governments have concurrent power
Congress lets states do certain things
Ex: minimum wage, set a floor but not a ceiling
Commerce Clause
Congress has power:
“To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with Indian tribes.”
Commerce Clause (continued)
Federal government has exclusive power to regulate commerce with foreign nations
Direct or indirect regulation by states that unduly burdens foreign commerce is unconstitutional
Ex: Massachusetts anti-Myanmar statute
Commerce Clause (continued)
The federal government may regulate:
Interstate commerce that crosses state borders
Intrastate commerce that affects interstate commerce
Commerce Clause (continued)
Interstate commerce very broadly defined
Ex: wheat grown for home consumption or refusing to rent motel rooms based on race both tied to interstate commerce so that federal regulation proper
Broad interpretation gives federal government great power to regulate, so that this clause has greater impact on business than any other constitutional clause
Commerce Clause (continued)
States have power to regulate private and business activities within their borders (“police powers”)
States may enact laws that protect or promote the public health, safety, morals, and general welfare as long as the laws do not unduly burden interstate commerce
Commerce Clause (continued)
Examples of state laws regulating business including zoning ordinances, state environmental laws, corporation and partnership laws, property laws
Area of considerable current litigation
Ex: Granholm v Heald (Michigans interstate wine ban found to be unconstitutional); Affordable Care Act
E-Commerce and the Constitution
Electronic commerce (e-commerce)
Parties are permitted to obtain website domain names and conduct business electronically
E-commerce can be used for
Sales of goods
Licensing of Intellectual property
Sales of services
The Bill of Rights
The Bill of Rights provides certain freedoms and protections to individuals and businesses
What “Speech” is fully protected under the constitution?
Commercial speech
Obscenity
Defamation
Political Speech
Bill of Rights
Ten amendments added 1791
Guarantees certain fundamental rights to “natural” persons (corporations = person?)
Protects persons from intrusive government action
By federal government
By state governments (“Incorporation doctrine”)
Amendments & Basic Protections
1st amendment
Freedoms:
Religion, press, speech, assembly
Right to petition for redress
First Amdendment Religion and Expression
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Freedom of Speech
Freedom of Speech - the right to engage in oral, writtem, and symbolic speech
Fully protectcted speech (political)
Limited protected speech (commercial)
Unprotected Speech (Obscenity)
Political speech is fully protected
Cannot be regulated or prohibited by government
Can be oral, written, or symbolic
Ex: writing editorial criticizing President, or flag burning as protest, or spening money to promote issues or candidates
Citizens United v FEC
Corporations are “persons” whose political speech is protected by First Amendment
Ban on political speech by corporations is unconstiutional
Disclaimers and disclosures are valid
Fractured 5-4 Supreme Court decision
Freedom of Speech (continued)
Speech with limited protection - can enact reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions
Offensive speech
Ex: offensive language on television may be restricted to late night hours
Commercial speech
Ex: billboards may be limited to certain locations, telemarketing calls may be restricted by Do-Not-Call registry, ads for commercial products must be truthful
Freedom of Speech (continued)
Unprotected speech
May be forbidden
Dangerous speech (“Fire” in a crowded theater)
Fighting words intended to provoke violent reactions
Speech that incites the violent overthrow of the government
Defamatory speech
Child pornography
Obscene speech (limited exception)
Free Speech and Violent Video Games
Case:
Brown, Governor of California v Entertainment Merchants Association
131 S. Ct. 2729, 180 L.Ed.2d 708 (2011)
Supreme Court of the United States
Issue
Does the California act that restricts violent video games violate the First Amendment?
Case 6.1: Freedom of Speech
Case
Snyder v. Phelps
131 S.Ct 1207 (2011)
District Court for the District of Maryland
Issue
Westboro congregation members picketed at the funeral and memorial service of marine Lance Corporal Snyder causing emotional distress and invasion fo privacy by intrusion upon seclusion
Does the First Amendment prohibit holding Westboro liable for its speech?
Freedom of Religion
The US Constitution requires federal, state, and local governments to be neutral toward religion
The Establishment Clause
First Amendment clause prohibiting the government from either establishing a state religion or promoting one religion over another
The Free Exercise Clause
First Amendment clause that prohibits the government from interring with the free exercise of religion
Case 4.5: Freedom of Religion
Case
Burwell v Hobby Lobby Stores Inc
Supreme Court of the United States
Issue
Do owners of closely held corporations have to provide health insurance coverage for their employers for methods of contraception that violate the owners sincerely held religious beliefs
Fourteenth Amendment
Added to Constituion in 1868 along with 13th Amendment banning slavery
Guarentees equal right to all persons after Civil War
Prohibits discriminatory and unfair action by state and local governments
Fourteenth Amendment Rights Guarenteed: Privileges and Immunities of Citizenship, Due Process and Equal Protection
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws
Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Equal Protection Clause (continued)
Provides that state cannot “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”
State, local, and federal governments are prohibited from enatcing laws that classify and treat “similary situated” persons differently
Artifical persons, such as corporations, are also protected (Citizens United)
Case for Equality
Case
Obergefell v Hodges (2015)
Supreme Court of the United States
Held
The Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process and Equal Protection clauses require a State to license anmarriage between two people of the same sex and to recognize a marriage between two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-State
Due Process Clause
Under Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, no person shall be deprived of “life, liberty, or property” without due process of law
14th Amendment Due Process used to “incorporate” Bill of Rights to apply to States
Procedural Due Process
“Life”
“Liberty”
“Property”
“Deprevation”
What process is due?
Notice
Hearing
Substantive Due Process
Arbitrary abuse of governmental power
No amount of process will permit deprivation
Fundamental rights not enumerated elsewhere in Constitution
“Deliberate indifference” that “shocks the conscience”
Whose conscience must be shocked?
Privileges and Immunities
Privilleges and Immunities Clause
“The Citizens of each state shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several states”
No state shall make or enforce any law that shall abridge the privileges or immunities of the citizens of the United States
Privileges and Immunities (continued)
The clauses prohibit states from enacting laws that unduly discriminate in favor of their residents
The clauses apply only to citizens and do not protect corporations or aliens
Introduction to Criminal Law
US criminal law system
Person charged is presumed innocent until proven guilty
The burden of proof is on the government
Accused must be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
Conviction requires unanimous jury vote
Accused is provided with constitutional safeguards under the 4th, 5th and 6th Amendments
Definition of a Crime
Crime: Any act done by an individual that violates a duty that he or she owes to society and for which the actor must pay a price to society
Crime
Inherently Wrong - Malum In Se
Deemed Wrong By Legislature - Malum Prohibitum
Examples
White-collar crime committed by:
Business entities
Desk workers
Accountants
Attorneys
Officers
Examples of White-Collar Crimes
Definition of a Crime
Penal Codes and Regulatory Statutes
Statutes are the source of criminal law
State penal codes and federal regulatory statutes define in detail:
The activities considered to be crimes within their jurisdiction
The penalties that will be imposed for their commission
Fines
Imprisonment
Crime Classifications
Felony → Indictment (Grand Jury) → Fine or Imprisonment
Misdeamor → Information (Gov’t Charge) → Fine or Jail <1yr
Definition of a Crime
Intent Crimes
Criminal act (actus reus)
Criminal intent (mens rea)
Specific intent crime (murder)
General intent crime (manslaughter)
Merely thinking about a crime is not a crime because no action has been taken
Nonintent crimes
Imposes criminal liability without finding of intent
Often imposed for reckless or grossly negligent conduct that causes injury to another person
Involuntary manslaughter is a nonintent crime
Criminal Procedure
Arrest (Probable Cause/Warrant)
Indictment or Information (Grand Jury)
Arraignment (Plea)
Trial (Unanimous Verdict)
Deadlock on jury = mistrial
Plea Bargain
Appeal (only defendant can appeal unless mistrial – no Double Jeopardy)
Grand Jury
Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
Before a trial, there must be presentment or an indictment by a grand jury
Consists of 23 citizens
Determine probable cause
Presumption of innocence: Presuming that an indicted person is innocent until found guilty by a petit jury
Serves as an investigative body
Functioning depends upon the secrecy of the proceedings
Arraignment
Accused informed of all charges
Asked to enter a plea
Guilty
Not guilty
Nolo contendere
Does not admit guilt, but agrees to penalty
Cannot be used as evidence of liability in civil trials
Plea Bargaining
Allows accused to plead to lesser crime
Saves money, time
Avoids risk of trial
Prevents further overcrowding of jails
Very common – more than 90% of cases
Criminal Trial
Verdict must be unanimous
If any juror doubts the guilt of the accused, the accused cannot be found guilty
If jurors cannot agree, jury considered to be a hung jury (deadlock)
Convicted defendant can appeal
If defendant found not guilty, government cannot appeal
Common Crimes
Murder
Unlawful killing of a human being by another person without justification
Different degrees of murder depending upon level of intent
Felony murder rule: Murder committed during commission of any felony may be prosecuted as murder
Intent to commit murder is inferred from intent to commit another crime
Robbery
The taking of personal property from another person by use of fear or force
If a weapon is used, it is considered armed or aggravated robbery
Burglary
The taking of personal property from another’s home, office, or commercial or other type of building
Larceny
Wrongful and fraudulent taking of another person’s personal property
Includes tangible property, trade secrets, computer programs, other business property
Force or entry into a structure not required
States distinguish between grand and petit larceny, based on value of property taken
Receiving stolen property
Knowingly receiving stolen property with the intention of depriving rightful owner of that property
Can be tangible property
Arson
Malicious or willful burning of another’s dwelling
Latest law applies to burning all types of structures
Includes willful burning by structure’s owner
Business and White-Collar Crimes
Forgery
Written documents fraudulently made or altered
Change affects legal liability of another person
Signing another person’s signature without intent to defraud is not forgery
Embezzlement
Fraudulent conversion of property by person to whom property is entrusted (employee theft and dishonesty)
Bribery
Offeror commits crime when bribe is offered
Offeree commits crime when bribe is accepted
Bribe can be of anything of value
Extortion
Threat to expose something about another person unless that other person gives money or property
Also known as blackmail
Criminal fraud
Obtaining money or property through deception or trickery
Includes:
Mail fraud
Wire fraud
Also called false pretenses or deceit
Requires intent to deceive, misstatement of material fact, justifiable reliance and injury
Under Money Laundering Control Act, a crime to:
Knowingly engage in monetary transaction through financial institution involving property worth more than $10,000
Knowingly engage in a financial transaction involving proceeds of an illegal activity
If convicted, fines of up to $500,000 or twice the value of the property and up to 20 years in prison
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO)
Criminal RICO - A federal crime to acquire or maintain an interest in, use income from, or conduct or participate in the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity
Civil RICO - Persons injured by a RICO violation can bring a private civil RICO action against the violator to recover for injury to business or property
Criminal conspiracy
Two or more persons enter into an agreement to commit a crime
Requires an overt act
Crime does not have to be committed
Obstruction of Justice
Act committed with intent to obstruct judicial or legislative proceedings/case:
Cleaning/purging/destroying electronic and paper files
Changing records of phone conversations
Cyber Crimes
Hacker (Cracker) – unlawful access to electronic information
Identity Theft
Electronic Theft
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)(unauthorized access or exceeding authorized access to computer)
trade secrets; confidential , proprietary information
personnel records, customer lists, formulae
Cyber Crimes (Cont)
Counterfeit Access Device and Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)
Federal crime to use a computer knowingly to obtain:
Restricted federal government information
Financial records of financial institutions
Consumer reports of consumer reporting
Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act:
Federal act that makes it a crime to transfer or use, without authority, the identity of another person knowingly and with the intent to commit any unlawful activity
Information Infrastructure Protection (IIP) Act:
Federal act that makes it a crime for anyone to access and acquire information intentionally from a protected computer without authorization
False Statement to a Bank
Law aims to protect banks and ensure the accuracy of financial information
A statement or report is false if it:
Relates to a material fact and is untrue
Is known to be untrue by the person making it
Bribery and Kickbacks
Of a public official = Federal charge
Illegal both domestically and internationally
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
“Fixing” a college or professional sporting event
FBI Sports Bribery Program
“Kickback” - Giving money back to someone who made a decision that benefited you or your company.
Trends
Increase in prosecution of white-collar criminals and legislative efforts to protect the public from fraud
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Investigation of illegal activities by top management
Plea bargaining with mid-level employees in exchange for testimony against top-level employees
Prosecutors capitalize on high-profile prosecutions
Fourth Amendment Search and Seizure
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no Warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Protection Against Unreasonable Search and Seizure
Fourth Amendment protects persons and corporations from overzealous investigative activities by the government
Reasonable search and seizure by the government is lawful
Search warrants based on probable cause are necessary in most cases
Government may not search businesses without a search warrant
4th Amendment “Probable Cause”
Reasonable, articulable suspicion that a crime has been, is being, or is about to be committed
Objective reasonableness - careful consideration of all facts and circumstances - do not have to be right
Major Exceptions to Search Warrant
Consent
Search Incident to Arrest
Plain View
Exigent Circumstances (fire, flight, etc.)
Automobile and suitcase/container
Stop/Frisk/Identify (Terry and Hiibel)
Border/laptop (U.S. v. Arnold)
Case 13.1 - Search Warrant
Case
Riley v. California
573 U.S. __ (2014)
Supreme Court
Issue
Riley was stopped for a traffic violation which led to his arrest on weapons charges
Plaintiff moved to suppress the evidence obtained from his cell phone
Trial court denied the motion
Supreme Court ruled that search of cell phone was unconstitutional
DNA Collection at Arrest
Case
Maryland v. King
133 S.Ct. 1958 (2013)(Supreme Court)
Issue
Did Maryland’s collection of King’s DNA during the booking procedure in 2009 constitute an unreasonable search and seizure?
Protection Against Unreasonable Search and Seizure
Exclusionary rule
Evidence obtained from an unreasonable search and seizure generally may not be used at trial
Good faith exception
Evidence may be introduced if law enforcement reasonably believed that they were acting pursuant to valid warrant
Fifth Amendment Rights of Persons
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Privilege Against Self-Incrimination
Fifth Amendment states that no person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself or herself
Protects natural persons only, not corporations
Attorney-client privilege
Client can tell his or her attorney anything about the case without fear that the attorney will be called as a witness against the client
No accountant-client privilege under federal law
Privilege Against Self-Incrimination
Immunity from prosecution
Government may offer person immunity from prosecution in exchange for testimony
Person loses right to assert Fifth Amendment privilege
Protection against double jeopardy
Fifth Amendment provides that persons cannot be tried twice for same crime (no appeal by government after not guilty verdict)
Sixth Amendment
Provides multiple protections that offer the right to:
Speedy and public trial
Trial by jury
Be informed of the charge against oneself
Confront the accuser
Subpoena witnesses in one’s favor
Have the assistance of an attorney
Physically Abusive Governmental Conduct
4TH Amendment - objective standard
“reasonable force” in effecting arrest/seizure
8th Amendment – applies in police custody/jail
Subjective standard
No “cruel and unusual punishment” like torture
“deliberate indifference” to “substantial risk of serious harm” (awareness of risk of harm)
14th Amendment Substantive Due Process –
subjective standard
“deliberate indifference” that “shocks the conscience”
Miranda v Arizona (1966)
Mirando warning required to be given by police to criminal suspects in police custody (or in a
custodial situation) before they are interrogated.
Right to remain silent
Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law
Right to have an attorney present during questioning
If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you at no charge to you
Miranda Warning
You have the right to remain silent
Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law
You have the right to talk to a lawyer and have him present with you while you are being questioned
If you cannot afford to hire a lawyer one will be appointed to represent you before any questioning if you wihs
You can divide at any time to exercise these rights and not answer any questions or make any statements
- *Waiver
Do you understand each of these rights I have explained to you? Hanging these rights in ming do you