Argumentative Essay Terms

Argumentative Essay Terms

General Instructions

• Write all the following argumentative terms in your Reading Writing Notebook.
• A test will be conducted on these terms to assess understanding.

Key Terms and Definitions

1. Claim

• Definition: The main point of the argument; what the author is trying to prove.

2. Counter-Claim

• Definition: The opposing side of the claim; an argument that challenges or disagrees with the claim being made.

3. Evidence

• Definition: Relevant quotes, data, statistics, or examples that support the claim.
• Importance: Evidence is crucial for substantiating the claim and persuading the audience.

4. Reasoning

• Definition: The explanation of how the evidence supports the claim.
• Function: Reasoning articulates the logical connection between the evidence presented and the main claim.

5. Refute

• Definition: To use evidence and reasoning to prove that the counter-claim is wrong.
• Process: This involves systematically addressing the opposing arguments and demonstrating their weaknesses.

6. Credible Sources

• Definition: Trustworthy and reliable sources that provide accurate information.
• Characteristics: These sources should be well-regarded in their field and provide factual, unbiased data.

7. Bias

• Definition: Showing favoritism or prejudice toward one side.
• Implications: Bias can undermine the credibility of an argument and skew the perception of the evidence.

8. Sufficient Evidence

• Definition: Enough strong, relevant evidence to fully support the claim.
• Criteria: Sufficient evidence should adequately address potential counter-claims and convincingly support the argument.

9. Sound Reasoning

• Definition: Logical thinking that clearly connects evidence to the claim.
• Importance: Sound reasoning is essential for constructing a valid argument that is convincing and comprehensible.

10. Evaluate

• Definition: To examine whether the reasoning is logical and whether the evidence is strong and sufficient.
• Process: Evaluating involves a critical assessment of the argument's components to ensure coherence and validity.