AQA Environmental Science Paper 2: Short Answer Topic Notes
Simpson's Diversity Index
Purpose and Application Simpson's Diversity Index is used to test, calculate, and interpret species diversity based on sample data. It provides a more comprehensive measure than species richness alone because it accounts for both the number of species present and the relative abundance (evenness) of each species.
The Mathematical Formula
- = the number of individuals belonging to each individual species.
- = the total number of all individuals of all species combined.
- = the diversity index, ranging from a value of to .
Interpreting the Index (D)
- Values close to 1: Indicate high diversity. This suggests a community with many different species that are evenly distributed. Such communities are generally more stable.
- Values close to 0: Indicate low diversity. This suggests a community dominated by one or two species.
Step-by-Step Calculation Method
- For every individual species in the sample, calculate .
- Sum all the results from step 1 to find .
- Calculate the total number of individuals () and determine .
- Divide the result of step 2 by the result of step 3 ().
- Subtract the final fraction from to find .
Worked Example
| Species | ||
|---|---|---|
| Daisy | ||
| Clover | ||
| Grass | ||
| Total |
Calculation:
Interpretation Language for Exams
- "A higher value indicates greater species diversity."
- "A value of X suggests the community is [relatively diverse / dominated by a few species]."
- "Comparing two sites: site A () has greater diversity than site B ()."
Common Exam Errors
- Forgetting the final step of subtracting the fraction from .
- Using the square of () instead of the prescribed .
- Assigning units to the result; is dimensionless (has no units).
- Confusing species richness (the simple count of species) with diversity (which combines richness and evenness).
Spearman's Rank Correlation
Purpose and Application This statistical test assesses whether there is a correlation between two variables and determines the strength and direction of that relationship.
The Mathematical Formula
- = the difference between the ranks assigned to each pair of data.
- = the number of data pairs.
- = Spearman's rank coefficient, ranging from to .
Interpreting the Coefficient (r_s)
- +1: Perfect positive correlation (as one variable increases, the other increases).
- -1: Perfect negative correlation (as one variable increases, the other decreases).
- 0: No correlation exists.
- Distance from zero: The closer the value is to , the stronger the relationship.
Step-by-Step Method
- Rank both variables separately. You can rank from highest to lowest or vice versa, but you must be consistent for both variables.
- For each pair of data, calculate the difference () between the two ranks ().
- Square each difference to get .
- Sum all the squared differences to find .
- Substitute the values into the formula.
- Compare the calculated to a critical value table using the correct and significance level (typically ).
The Critical Value Rule
- If the absolute value of () is higher than or equal to ($\geq$) the critical value, the correlation is significant. You reject the null hypothesis.
- If is lower than () the critical value, the correlation is not significant. You accept the null hypothesis.
Exam Writing Guide When discussing results, always include:
- The calculated value and the sample size .
- The critical value and the significance level used.
- A statement on significance.
- A description of the direction and strength. Example: "There is a significant positive correlation between X and Y (, , ), suggesting that as X increases, Y increases."
Common Exam Errors
- Ranking in the wrong direction or failing to handle ties correctly (for tied data, average the ranks; e.g., if two items are joint 3rd and 4th, both receive rank ).
- Stating the coefficient without comparing it to a critical value.
- Assuming correlation implies causation.
Lincoln Index (Mark-Release-Recapture)
Purpose and Application This method is used to estimate the total population size of a species (usually mobile animals) using capture data.
The Mathematical Formula
- = the estimated total population size.
- = the number of individuals caught, marked, and released in the first sample.
- = the total number of individuals caught in the second sample.
- = the number of marked individuals recaptured in the second sample.
Worked Example
- First catch (): woodlice are marked and released.
- Second catch (): individuals are caught.
- Recaptures (): Of the , were found to be marked.
- Calculation: .
Required Assumptions To be valid, these five assumptions must be met:
- Marked individuals must mix randomly and completely with the rest of the population.
- The population must be closed; there are no births, deaths, immigration, or emigration between the two sampling events.
- The marking process does not affect the animal's survival (e.g., making them more visible to predators) or behavior.
- Marks are not lost or rubbed off between samples.
- Both sampling events are random.
Impact of Violated Assumptions
- Deaths or Emigration: If marked animals die or leave, will be lower, leading to an overestimation of .
- Immigration: New unmarked animals entering the population increase the total population but decrease the proportion of marked animals caught ( is lower), leading to an overestimation of .
- Mark Loss: If marks are lost, is lower, causing an overestimation of .
- Non-random mixing: If marked animals become "trap-shy" and avoid recapture, is lower, leading to an overestimation of population size.
Marine Productivity & The Photic Zone
Definitions
- Photic Zone: The surface layer of the ocean where light penetration is sufficient for photosynthesis. Usually ranges from , though depth varies based on water clarity.
- Aphotic Zone: The region below the photic zone where light is insufficient for photosynthesis; organisms here rely on organic matter sinking from above.
- Compensation Depth: The specific depth where the rate of photosynthesis exactly equals the rate of respiration ().
- Primary Productivity: The rate at which organic matter is produced by photosynthesis per unit area per unit time.
Factors Limiting Productivity
- Light: Intensity decreases with depth. Turbidity (closeness/cloudiness of water) reduces light penetration further.
- Nutrients: Nitrogen (N) and Phosphorus (P) are often the primary limiting factors in the open ocean. Upwelling is required to bring these from the deep to the surface.
- Temperature: Warmer waters increase enzyme-driven reaction rates. However, a strong thermocline (temperature gradient) can prevent nutrient-rich deep water from mixing with the surface.
- CO2: Rarely a limiting factor in marine environments.
Seasonal Productivity Patterns (Temperate Seas)
- Spring Bloom: Increasing light levels and high nutrient levels (mixed up during winter) lead to rapid phytoplankton growth.
- Summer: Productivity drops. Nutrients are depleted by the spring bloom, and a thermocline forms, preventing further upwelling of nutrients.
- Autumn Mini-bloom: The thermocline breaks down as water cools, allowing a brief period of nutrient mixing before light levels drop too low.
- Winter: Productivity is at its lowest because light is the limiting factor, despite nutrients being abundant.
Upwelling and Efficiency
- Upwelling: Wind-driven divergence of surface water causes cold, nutrient-rich deep water to rise. This creates highly productive zones (e.g., the Peruvian coast) which are the basis for major commercial fisheries.
- Food Chain Efficiency: Only approximately of energy transfers between trophic levels. Short food chains (e.g., phytoplankton fish) are more efficient than long ones.
r vs K Selection Strategies
Core Concept Species evolve different reproductive strategies depending on the stability and characteristics of their environment.
Comparison Table
| Feature | r-selected | K-selected |
|---|---|---|
| Body Size | Small | Large |
| Lifespan | Short | Long |
| Age at first reproduction | Early | Late |
| Offspring per event | Many | Few |
| Parental Care | Little or none | Extensive |
| Population Size | Fluctuates widely | Constant, near carrying capacity () |
| Survival of Young | Low | High |
| Habitat | Unstable / Disturbed / Pioneer | Stable / Climax Community |
| Competitive Ability | Low | High |
| Examples | Insects, mice, bacteria | Elephants, whales, oak trees |
Survivorship Curves
- Type I (K-selected): High survival rate in early and middle life, followed by a rapid decline in old age (e.g., humans).
- Type II: A constant mortality rate experienced throughout the entire lifespan (e.g., many birds).
- Type III (r-selected): Extremely high mortality rates for the young; the few survivors live for a long time (e.g., most plants, many fish).
Conservation Implications K-selected species are considerably more vulnerable to population decline because they are slow to recover from exploitation or habitat loss due to their low reproductive rates. Conversely, r-selected species can recover rapidly after a disturbance.
Monitoring Technologies
eDNA (Environmental DNA)
- Process: Organisms shed DNA into water, soil, or air. Samples are collected and filtered. PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) amplifies specific sequences, which are then compared to reference databases.
- Applications: Detecting rare or cryptic species (e.g., great crested newts), monitoring invasive species (e.g., signal crayfish), and conducting broad biodiversity surveys (metabarcoding).
- Advantages: Non-invasive; highly sensitive (detects low densities); cost-effective.
- Limitations: DNA degrades within hours/days; cannot determine exact population size or if the organism is currently alive; risk of cross-contamination.
Satellite Tracking
- Process: Transmitters (GPS/ARGOS) are attached to animals, or satellites use remote sensing to monitor habitats.
- Applications: Mapping migration routes (whales, birds); monitoring deforestation rates (using NDVI - Normalised Difference Vegetation Index); tracking sea surface temperatures and ice cover.
- Advantages: Covers vast, inaccessible areas; provides real-time, continuous data; long-term data collection.
- Limitations: High equipment and operation costs; battery life limitations; tags may influence animal behavior or survival.
Habitat Factors: Area, Shape & Corridors
Island Biogeography Theory
- Proposed by MacArthur and Wilson. Larger habitats support more species because they have lower extinction rates and more diverse microhabitats.
- Species-Area Relationship: (Species number increases with area).
Habitat Shape and Edge Effects
- Edge Effect: The boundary between a habitat and the surrounding land has different abiotic conditions (higher light, more wind). Edge species thrive here, but interior specialists (who require stable, deep-habitat conditions) suffer.
- Circular Reserves: Have a low edge-to-interior ratio, which is ideal for protecting interior specialists.
- Elongated/Fragmeted Reserves: Have a high edge-to-interior ratio, making them susceptible to edge effects.
Habitat Corridors These are linear strips (e.g., hedgerows, wildlife bridges) that connect isolated habitat patches.
- Benefits: Enable gene flow (reducing inbreeding), allow recolonization of patches after local extinction, and facilitate range shifts due to climate change.
- Risks: May facilitate the spread of diseases or invasive species.
SLOSS Debate
- Single Large: Better for interior specialists and large populations; fewer edge effects.
- Several Small: Provides redundancy (if one patch is hit by disease, others survive); geographically spreads risk.
- Current Consensus: The ideal setup is several connected reserves, which is better than one single large reserve, which is in turn better than several isolated small patches.