COMS 361 - Lecture 5, Media Models and Beneficial Propaganda
Media Models Related to Beneficial Propaganda
Increasing use of positive propaganda strategies via mass media.
Effective message delivery leads to significant behaviour changes when combined with community components.
Various media theories can explain these messages in the context of media, technology, and society.
Three key communication theories discussed:
Linear Models of Communication
One-Way Communication
A sender transmits a message and a receiver absorbs it in the presence of noise.
No feedback of response
Things That Affect the One-Way Communication Process
The choice of channel selected
Linear communication examples:
Emails, blog posts, social media posts
Critiques
Lack of feedback does not account for continuous communication exchanges
These model don’t explain other forms of communication
Shannon & Weaver’s Communication Model

This model was developed by Shannon & Weaver and depicts the flow of communication.
Describes communication as a linear process involving:
Sender → Signal → Receiver.
Noise that may disrupt the interpretation of the signal.
Key features:
Viewed as sending and receiving information.
Message can be conveyed in spoken or textual form.
Noise (psychological factors) can affect message interpretation.
Strengths:
Simplicity, generality, and quantifiability.
Direct public information messages from authorities to audiences.
Harold Lasswell’s Linear Model

Looks at the relationship between the communicator and the receiver
Focuses on sender, receiver, and the effect of the message
Lasswell famously says “Who says what in which channel and to whom with what effect”.
Prioritizes the messages and draws attention to its effect
Two-Step Flow Model of Communication

This model (developed by Lazersfeld et al.) proposes that interpersonal interaction has a far stronger effect on shaping public opinion than mass media outlets.
Mass media content reaches “opinion leaders”
Active media users who collect, interpret, and diffuse the meaning of media messages to less-active media consumers
Suggests that most people receive information from opinion leaders through interpersonal communication rather than directly from mass media.
Authors based their argument on their survey of US voters in 1940:
Most voters got their election information about the candidates from other people who read about the campaign in the newspapers, not directly from the media.
Suggests that word-of-mouth transmission of information plays and important role in the communication process and that mass media only have a limited influence on most individuals.
This model challenged and reversed the dominant paradigm in mass communication at the time:
It used to be assumed that mass media have a direct influence on a mass audience who consume and absorb media messages
Interpersonal communication with members of a person’s social surroundings (family, friends, coworkers) turned out to be better predictors of voting behaviour than someone’s media exposure
This theory, applied to mass media campaigns, suggests that the use of opinions leaders, credible experts, or credible interpersonal relations in delivering the message, can have a significant impact on the resulting message and its impact on audiences
Media Functionalism

This model looks at the word of media through the lens of its operations as a social actor in the smooth running of the social structure.
There are four functions to the media according to Charles Wright:
Surveillance of the environment
Correlation of the parts of society in responding to the environment
Transmission of the social heritage from one generation to the next
Entertainment
Distinction between intended mass media purposes and unintended consequences.
Additional functions:
Information-providing function of media is important because it ensures that audiences are provided with credible and timely information.
Provides necessary education to audiences in which persuasion is an important technique.
Offering surveillance of the social system which it serves in order to warn audiences of impending harms that may occur.
Summary
We have covered communication theories that can be applied to media messages and campaigns that aim at conveying messages deemed important and urgent.