2.7
2.7 The Question of Causation
- Examples of Pairs of Variables
- Accepted Causation:
- Example: The amount of fertilizer used and the yield of crops.
- Rejected Causation:
- Example: Declared television ownership and life expectancy.
- Reason for Decision Making:
- Causation acceptance or rejection is typically made based on experimental evidence or strong associative relationships.
Explaining Association
Causation Definition:
- A change in variable x causes a change in variable y.
Common Response Definition:
- A lurking variable z causes a change in both x and y, leading to a spurious association.
Confounding Definition:
- Variables x and z both affect y, and their separate effects cannot be distinguished from one another.
Examples:
- Causation Example:
- Amount of fertilizer leads directly to increased crop yield.
- Common Response Example:
- Nations with more television sets tend to have higher life expectancy, with wealth as a lurking variable.
Establishing Causation
Experimental Approach:
- The most reliable way to establish cause and effect is through experiments that manipulate one explanatory variable while controlling other influences that may affect the response.
Limitations of Experimental Approach:
- Conducting experiments may not be feasible in studying complex environments or human conditions where ethical and practical constraints exist.
Establishing Causation without an Experiment
- Criteria to Establish Causation Without Experimental Data:
- Find a Strong Association:
- Example: There is a strong correlation between smoking and lung cancer.
- Consistency of Association:
- The association is consistent across different regions and countries, indicating a stable relationship.
- Correlation with Dose:
- Higher amounts of exposure (e.g., cigarette smoking) lead to more severe effects (increased prevalence of lung cancer).
- Temporal Precedence:
- The alleged cause must precede the effect in time (e.g., lung cancer appearing after years of smoking).
- Plausibility of Cause:
- The causal relationship must be supported by plausible biological mechanisms, as seen in animal experiments demonstrating that tobacco smoke tars can cause cancer.