Human Language: Biology, Universals, Development, and Cross-Species Comparisons
Course Logistics & Context
- Remaining schedule
- Wed: Schizophrenia
- Fri: Biology of Religion
- Next Wed (final): Personality Disorders/Individual Differences
- No dedicated lecture on Depression this year
- Last two lectures may not be taped
- Cortex contains ≈2×1010−3×1010 neurons, each making ∼104 synapses
- Depending on wiring efficiency, total axonal length could range from a few km to “1014 miles”
- Developmental solution
- Two‐generation system
- 1° radial glia set up scaffolding
- 2° neurons migrate & connect at optimal nodes
- Swarm intelligence = brain’s analogue of solving travelling-salesman problem (minimise cable length while maximising connectivity)
Universals of Human Language
- Semanticity
- Continuous acoustic spectrum is chunked into discrete, meaningful units (phonemes → morphemes → words)
- Discreteness: impossible to utter "6.5 words"; you either have a word or you don’t
- Embedded / hierarchical clauses
- All languages allow A can do B … except under conditions x/y/z
- Recursion / Generativity
- Finite lexicon → infinite sentences
- “Bill said that… Jane said that Bill said that …”
- Displacement
- Ability to discuss past/future, distant places, hypothetical events
- Arbitrariness of sign
- No intrinsic link between signal & meaning (e.g., “dog” does not look/ sound like a dog)
- Meta-communication
- Capacity to talk about language (linguistics, dictionaries, language academies, ASL councils)
- Motherese (infant-directed speech/sign)
- Universal high-pitch, exaggerated intonation, repetition, close eye contact
- Debate: instructional vs emotional function
- Similarities to pet-directed speech but with clearer articulation when aimed at babies (goal = teaching)
Language Is Cognitive, Not Merely Motoric
- Evidence from Sign Languages (esp. ASL)
- Deaf infants “babble” with hands at same age hearing infants babble vocally (esp. before sleep)
- Strokes in signers → Broca-like or Wernicke-like deficits in signing (not speech)
- Prosody exists in ASL
- Facial expression, body shift to mark dialogue, rhythm → conveys tone/ emotion just as vocal prosody does
- Auditory cortex activates in congenitally deaf signers watching signs ⇒ cortex repurposed for symbolic processing, not sound per se
- Regional “accents,” slurring & poetry (manual rhyme) in ASL
- Puns possible (e.g., iconic sign for “milk” → “past-your-eyes milk” = “pasteurised milk”)
- Second-language storage parallels spoken L2 (same cortical real estate)
- Even whistle-based language of Canary Islanders maps onto Broca/Wernicke analogues
Neurobiology of Language
- Three canonical cortical areas
- Broca’s area: inferior frontal gyrus (motor planning → production)
- Wernicke’s area: posterior superior temporal gyrus (comprehension)
- Arcuate fasciculus: white-matter tract linking the two (conduction)
- Classic aphasias
- Broca’s (non-fluent/production): halting speech, intact comprehension
- Wernicke’s (fluent/receptive): word salad, impaired comprehension
- Conduction aphasia: intact comprehension & speech but impaired repetition; pure lesions rare
- Numerous micro-aphasias: alexia (reading loss), agraphia (writing loss), even semaphore aphasia
- Lateralisation
- ≈90% of right-handers (and majority of left-handers) = left-hemisphere language
- Left peri-Sylvian cortex physically thicker
- WADA test: transiently anaesthetise one hemisphere via carotid → identify language side (being replaced by fMRI)
- Right hemisphere = prosody, sarcasm, facial & bodily cues; right-side strokes → aprosodia
- Sub-cortical & limbic contributions
- Basal ganglia: motoric gesturing; people gesture on phone even when unseen; blind speakers gesture
- Limbic system
- Enables emotional colouring, music & singing
- Broca’s patients can sometimes sing what they cannot say (melodic intonation therapy)
- Tourette’s coprolalia = limbic over-drive bypassing cortical control
- Modularity debate
- Williams syndrome: eloquent speech despite IQ≈70 (suggests separability)
- Specific Language Impairment (SLI): poor language with normal IQ
- Counter-argument: both cases show broader cognitive anomalies → language not an isolated “Swiss-Army-Knife blade”
Evolutionary Precursors in Primates
- Structural
- Great-ape & monkey brains show slight leftward enlargement in pre-Broca & auditory cortex
- Functional
- Vocalisations accompanied by stronger right-side facial expressions (=> left-hemisphere drive)
- fMRI: species-specific calls preferentially activate left temporal areas
- Fossil endocasts (Australopithecus) already show asymmetry ∼1 Myr ago
Development & Acquisition
- Milestones
- 1−3 mo: equal response to all phonemes; begin preferring speech over non-speech sounds
- 3−6 mo: statistical learning of syllable co-occurrence; focus on vowels
- ≈8 mo: babbling (signed or spoken); right-face expressivity > left
- 9−12 mo: lose ability to discriminate unused phonemes; produce language-specific sounds
- 15−20 mo: first novel combinations = Chomsky’s explosion (proof against strict behaviourism)
- Vocabulary growth → peaks of ∼10 new words/day; adult lexicon ∼6×104 words
- Neural maturation
- Gene-expression asymmetry in fetal cortex ∼12−16 wk gestation
- Myelination: Wernicke’s precedes Broca’s by ≈3 mo (comprehend before speak)
- Critical periods
- Accent-free mastery rare if L2 starts > ≈12 y
- <6 y bilinguals: L1 & L2 share cortical territory; later learners recruit adjacent sites → possible selective aphasia
- Statistical Learning vs Poverty-of-Stimulus
- Chomsky: innate Universal Grammar; children create rules despite imperfect input
- Empirical work: infants track transitional probabilities of syllables; can detect violations via heart-rate
- Behaviourism vs Nativism
- Skinner: operant conditioning (reward correct utterance)
- Chomsky/Brown: creativity, generativity & rapid growth impossible via reinforcement alone
Social & Cultural Forces
- Peer > Parent influence (Judith Rich Harris)
- Children adopt community accent, not parents’ (esp. immigrant families)
- Languages encode social values
- Formal/informal pronouns (tu/vous) shift after revolutions
- Kin terms tied to interlocutor (Malay lingo: aunt-via-mother vs aunt-via-grandmother)
- Absolute vs egocentric spatial reference (e.g., “foot to the NW is burning”)
- Sapir–Whorf Hypothesis
- Language shapes thought; evidence from Amazonian tribes
- Paraha: number terms = {1, 2, >2}
- Munduruku: {1–5, >5}
- Performance normal within lexicon range; chance-level beyond → cognition constrained by available words
Animal Communication: Parallels & Gaps
- Shared features
- Semanticity: vervet & chicken alarm calls (raptor vs snake; synonymy)
- Multimodal integration: mismatched face–voice in films startles monkeys
- Intentionality/theory-of-mind seeds: alarm calls more frequent with kin; suppressed with rivals
- Uniquely (mostly) human
- Extensive displacement & recursion
- Arbitrary symbols unlinked to emotion → enables lying
- Animals’ emotional signals (pheromones, tail position) are involuntary; a frightened dog can only cover scent by tucking tail, not fake confidence
Teaching Apes Human Language – A Cautionary History
- Vocal attempts
- 1930s “Vicky” forced to say “cup” via operant training → neurotic & failed (laryngeal anatomy inadequate)
- Kellogg’s chimp “Gua” raised with human infant Donald → Donald began imitating chimp sounds, no language for chimp
- Sign-language era
- Washoe (Gardners, Nevada)
- ~150 ASL signs; claimed word invention “water bird” = duck; filmed lying & babbling “tickle me”
- Sarah (Premack, Penn.)
- Used magnetic symbols; could handle conditional statements & analogies
- Coco the gorilla (Patterson, Stanford → Woodside)
- Publicised as understanding dreams, gossip; notorious anecdote: blamed handler “Bill” for eaten plant
- Data largely anecdotal; no peer-reviewed corpus
- Nim Chimpsky (Terrace, Columbia)
- Intensive analysis showed
- Random word order; longer utterances ≠ more meaning
- >95\% responses were trainer-prompted (not spontaneous)
- Terrace’s 1980 Science paper dismantled previous claims; concluded apes master gestural requests, not language
- Aftermath
- Patterson vs Terrace feud; promises to return Coco to SF Zoo broken (“has human values”) → legal kerfuffle
- Field largely collapsed; most evidence deemed wishful interpretation
- Current status – Kanzi (Savage-Rumbaugh)
- Bonobo using lexigram board & understanding spoken English
- Demonstrates
- Spontaneity & comprehension of novel sentences
- Conditional clauses & analogies
- Errors stay within semantic category (apple vs orange) – human-like mistake pattern
Key Take-Home Themes
- Biological wiring seeks efficiency; language areas reflect evolutionary & developmental optimisation
- Core universals (semanticity, recursion, displacement, arbitrariness, meta-language) separate human language from animal communication
- Sign-language data prove language is symbolic cognition, not mouth/throat mechanics
- Left-hemisphere specialisation is strong but prosody & emotion recruit right cortex & limbic circuits
- Acquisition is rapid, creative & peer-driven; behaviourist reward alone cannot explain vocabulary explosion
- Thought and language intertwine— sometimes restricting cognition (numeracy in Amazon tribes)
- Attempts to graft human language onto apes underline both shared cognitive substrates and stark limitations (true syntax, spontaneous generativity, unlimited displacement)
- Best evidence of cross-species symbolic competence (Kanzi) still falls short of full‐blown human grammar