Human Language: Biology, Universals, Development, and Cross-Species Comparisons

Course Logistics & Context

  • Remaining schedule
    • Wed: Schizophrenia
    • Fri: Biology of Religion
    • Next Wed (final): Personality Disorders/Individual Differences
    • No dedicated lecture on Depression this year
    • Last two lectures may not be taped

Optimising the Cortex: "Travelling Salesman" in Neural Wiring

  • Cortex contains 2×10103×1010\approx 2\times10^{10}-3\times10^{10} neurons, each making 104\sim10^{4} synapses
  • Depending on wiring efficiency, total axonal length could range from a few km to “101410^{14} miles”
  • Developmental solution
    • Two‐generation system
    • 1° radial glia set up scaffolding
    • 2° neurons migrate & connect at optimal nodes
    • Swarm intelligence = brain’s analogue of solving travelling-salesman problem (minimise cable length while maximising connectivity)

Universals of Human Language

  • Semanticity
    • Continuous acoustic spectrum is chunked into discrete, meaningful units (phonemes → morphemes → words)
    • Discreteness: impossible to utter "6.56.5 words"; you either have a word or you don’t
  • Embedded / hierarchical clauses
    • All languages allow A can do Bexcept under conditions x/y/z
  • Recursion / Generativity
    • Finite lexicon → infinite sentences
    • “Bill said that… Jane said that Bill said that …”
  • Displacement
    • Ability to discuss past/future, distant places, hypothetical events
  • Arbitrariness of sign
    • No intrinsic link between signal & meaning (e.g., “dog” does not look/ sound like a dog)
  • Meta-communication
    • Capacity to talk about language (linguistics, dictionaries, language academies, ASL councils)
  • Motherese (infant-directed speech/sign)
    • Universal high-pitch, exaggerated intonation, repetition, close eye contact
    • Debate: instructional vs emotional function
    • Similarities to pet-directed speech but with clearer articulation when aimed at babies (goal = teaching)

Language Is Cognitive, Not Merely Motoric

  • Evidence from Sign Languages (esp. ASL)
    • Deaf infants “babble” with hands at same age hearing infants babble vocally (esp. before sleep)
    • Strokes in signers → Broca-like or Wernicke-like deficits in signing (not speech)
    • Prosody exists in ASL
    • Facial expression, body shift to mark dialogue, rhythm → conveys tone/ emotion just as vocal prosody does
    • Auditory cortex activates in congenitally deaf signers watching signs ⇒ cortex repurposed for symbolic processing, not sound per se
    • Regional “accents,” slurring & poetry (manual rhyme) in ASL
    • Puns possible (e.g., iconic sign for “milk” → “past-your-eyes milk” = “pasteurised milk”)
    • Second-language storage parallels spoken L2 (same cortical real estate)
    • Even whistle-based language of Canary Islanders maps onto Broca/Wernicke analogues

Neurobiology of Language

  • Three canonical cortical areas
    • Broca’s area: inferior frontal gyrus (motor planning → production)
    • Wernicke’s area: posterior superior temporal gyrus (comprehension)
    • Arcuate fasciculus: white-matter tract linking the two (conduction)
  • Classic aphasias
    • Broca’s (non-fluent/production): halting speech, intact comprehension
    • Wernicke’s (fluent/receptive): word salad, impaired comprehension
    • Conduction aphasia: intact comprehension & speech but impaired repetition; pure lesions rare
    • Numerous micro-aphasias: alexia (reading loss), agraphia (writing loss), even semaphore aphasia
  • Lateralisation
    • 90%\approx90\% of right-handers (and majority of left-handers) = left-hemisphere language
    • Left peri-Sylvian cortex physically thicker
    • WADA test: transiently anaesthetise one hemisphere via carotid → identify language side (being replaced by fMRI)
    • Right hemisphere = prosody, sarcasm, facial & bodily cues; right-side strokes → aprosodia
  • Sub-cortical & limbic contributions
    • Basal ganglia: motoric gesturing; people gesture on phone even when unseen; blind speakers gesture
    • Limbic system
    • Enables emotional colouring, music & singing
    • Broca’s patients can sometimes sing what they cannot say (melodic intonation therapy)
    • Tourette’s coprolalia = limbic over-drive bypassing cortical control
  • Modularity debate
    • Williams syndrome: eloquent speech despite IQ70\text{IQ}\approx70 (suggests separability)
    • Specific Language Impairment (SLI): poor language with normal IQ
    • Counter-argument: both cases show broader cognitive anomalies → language not an isolated “Swiss-Army-Knife blade”

Evolutionary Precursors in Primates

  • Structural
    • Great-ape & monkey brains show slight leftward enlargement in pre-Broca & auditory cortex
  • Functional
    • Vocalisations accompanied by stronger right-side facial expressions (=> left-hemisphere drive)
    • fMRI: species-specific calls preferentially activate left temporal areas
    • Fossil endocasts (Australopithecus) already show asymmetry 1 Myr\sim1\text{ Myr} ago

Development & Acquisition

  • Milestones
    • 131{-}3 mo: equal response to all phonemes; begin preferring speech over non-speech sounds
    • 363{-}6 mo: statistical learning of syllable co-occurrence; focus on vowels
    • 8\approx8 mo: babbling (signed or spoken); right-face expressivity > left
    • 9129{-}12 mo: lose ability to discriminate unused phonemes; produce language-specific sounds
    • 152015{-}20 mo: first novel combinations = Chomsky’s explosion (proof against strict behaviourism)
    • Vocabulary growth → peaks of 10\sim10 new words/day; adult lexicon 6×104\sim6\times10^{4} words
  • Neural maturation
    • Gene-expression asymmetry in fetal cortex 1216\sim12{-}16 wk gestation
    • Myelination: Wernicke’s precedes Broca’s by 3\approx3 mo (comprehend before speak)
  • Critical periods
    • Accent-free mastery rare if L2 starts > 12\approx12 y
    • <66 y bilinguals: L1 & L2 share cortical territory; later learners recruit adjacent sites → possible selective aphasia
  • Statistical Learning vs Poverty-of-Stimulus
    • Chomsky: innate Universal Grammar; children create rules despite imperfect input
    • Empirical work: infants track transitional probabilities of syllables; can detect violations via heart-rate
  • Behaviourism vs Nativism
    • Skinner: operant conditioning (reward correct utterance)
    • Chomsky/Brown: creativity, generativity & rapid growth impossible via reinforcement alone

Social & Cultural Forces

  • Peer > Parent influence (Judith Rich Harris)
    • Children adopt community accent, not parents’ (esp. immigrant families)
  • Languages encode social values
    • Formal/informal pronouns (tu/vous) shift after revolutions
    • Kin terms tied to interlocutor (Malay lingo: aunt-via-mother vs aunt-via-grandmother)
    • Absolute vs egocentric spatial reference (e.g., “foot to the NW is burning”)
  • Sapir–Whorf Hypothesis
    • Language shapes thought; evidence from Amazonian tribes
    • Paraha: number terms = {1, 2, >2}
    • Munduruku: {1–5, >5}
    • Performance normal within lexicon range; chance-level beyond → cognition constrained by available words

Animal Communication: Parallels & Gaps

  • Shared features
    • Semanticity: vervet & chicken alarm calls (raptor vs snake; synonymy)
    • Multimodal integration: mismatched face–voice in films startles monkeys
    • Intentionality/theory-of-mind seeds: alarm calls more frequent with kin; suppressed with rivals
  • Uniquely (mostly) human
    • Extensive displacement & recursion
    • Arbitrary symbols unlinked to emotion → enables lying
    • Animals’ emotional signals (pheromones, tail position) are involuntary; a frightened dog can only cover scent by tucking tail, not fake confidence

Teaching Apes Human Language – A Cautionary History

  • Vocal attempts
    • 1930s “Vicky” forced to say “cup” via operant training → neurotic & failed (laryngeal anatomy inadequate)
    • Kellogg’s chimp “Gua” raised with human infant Donald → Donald began imitating chimp sounds, no language for chimp
  • Sign-language era
    • Washoe (Gardners, Nevada)
    • ~150 ASL signs; claimed word invention “water bird” = duck; filmed lying & babbling “tickle me”
    • Sarah (Premack, Penn.)
    • Used magnetic symbols; could handle conditional statements & analogies
    • Coco the gorilla (Patterson, Stanford → Woodside)
    • Publicised as understanding dreams, gossip; notorious anecdote: blamed handler “Bill” for eaten plant
    • Data largely anecdotal; no peer-reviewed corpus
    • Nim Chimpsky (Terrace, Columbia)
    • Intensive analysis showed
      • Random word order; longer utterances ≠ more meaning
      • >95\% responses were trainer-prompted (not spontaneous)
    • Terrace’s 1980 Science paper dismantled previous claims; concluded apes master gestural requests, not language
  • Aftermath
    • Patterson vs Terrace feud; promises to return Coco to SF Zoo broken (“has human values”) → legal kerfuffle
    • Field largely collapsed; most evidence deemed wishful interpretation
  • Current status – Kanzi (Savage-Rumbaugh)
    • Bonobo using lexigram board & understanding spoken English
    • Demonstrates
    • Spontaneity & comprehension of novel sentences
    • Conditional clauses & analogies
    • Errors stay within semantic category (apple vs orange) – human-like mistake pattern

Key Take-Home Themes

  • Biological wiring seeks efficiency; language areas reflect evolutionary & developmental optimisation
  • Core universals (semanticity, recursion, displacement, arbitrariness, meta-language) separate human language from animal communication
  • Sign-language data prove language is symbolic cognition, not mouth/throat mechanics
  • Left-hemisphere specialisation is strong but prosody & emotion recruit right cortex & limbic circuits
  • Acquisition is rapid, creative & peer-driven; behaviourist reward alone cannot explain vocabulary explosion
  • Thought and language intertwine— sometimes restricting cognition (numeracy in Amazon tribes)
  • Attempts to graft human language onto apes underline both shared cognitive substrates and stark limitations (true syntax, spontaneous generativity, unlimited displacement)
  • Best evidence of cross-species symbolic competence (Kanzi) still falls short of full‐blown human grammar