Other topics: terrorism, war, pregnancy & birth, medical complications, murder, undetermined events, mental health disorders, transport accidents, suicide, musculoskeletal disorders, diabetes, non-transport accidents, infections, kidney disorders, digestive disorders, nervous system disorders
Injury in Australia (2011–12)
454,000 Australians were hospitalised due to injury in 2011–12
Two main causes of injury: falls and transport accidents
Source: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) injury data
Road trauma in Victoria: timeline of legislative interventions
1952–2012 era depicted in a timeline with milestone interventions
Key milestones and approximate years:
1970: Compulsory seatbelt legislation introduced
1976: Random breath testing introduced
1983: Red light cameras introduced
1989: Mobile speed cameras introduced
1990: Booze buses introduced
2000: Fixed speed cameras introduced
2001: Victorian State Trauma System implemented
2006: Random drug testing and impounding of hoons’ cars introduced
Additional notes: CT scans (x50k) referenced; a CT scan can take about 20 minutes for a full body scan; visual metaphor: "Donut of death → donut of truth" indicating interpretation of imaging data
Time axis spans 1952–2012; data source: Transport Accident Commission (TAC) and related Grand Round slides
Notes for TAC & CT Scan Graph (Trevor Fitzgerald talk, The Alfred Hospital)
Victorian Trauma Grand Round – 27 June 2017; overview of trauma care at The Alfred over the past 16 years
Highlights:
The road trauma graphs tell a story when milestones are indicated on the timeline
The rate of CT scans has increased as technology improves
Full body CT scan duration ~20 minutes
Donut metaphor: "Donut of death" vs. "donut of truth" for interpreting imaging data
Two cycling deaths in Victorian roads in 1 week (2015)
17 June 2015: Died 29 June 2015; coverage in news outlets
Raises the question: how safe is cycling?
Notes for previous slide: implications of cycling deaths (2015)
June 2015: Two cycling deaths in one week
One victim: 17-year-old on a training ride
Other victim: wearing bright clothing, commuting to work as usual
Personal reflection on cycling safety and data interpretation
What data will be available? (Mortality and Morbidity)
Mortality: deaths while cycling
Morbidity: level of injury (serious, moderate, mild, no injury, near miss)
Data sources: death records, hospital records, doctor records, physiotherapy records, etc.
Raw mortality data for 2015: questions and utility
Question framing: what would you like to know?
Data usefulness: raw counts are not as useful as summary statistics for interpretation
MORTALITY - BY METHOD OF TRANSPORT AND YEAR (Australia, 1980–2013)
Graph type: All Road Fatalities for Australia (1980–2013)
CROSS TABULATION OF TWO CATEGORICAL VARIABLES (example data)
Dataset: Respiratory symptoms in past 12 months (Yes/No) by Gender of child (Female/Male)
Table (example numbers):
Female: Yes = 81, No = 254, Total = 335
Male: Yes = 64, No = 237, Total = 301
Totals: Yes = 145, No = 491, Total = 636
Percentages shown in table:
Row percentages (by gender): Female: Yes 24.18%, No 75.82% (Total 100%); Male: Yes 21.26%, No 78.74% (Total 100%)
Column percentages (by symptom status): Yes column: Female 55.86%, Male 44.14%; No column: Female 51.73%, Male 48.27%
Overall totals: 145 Yes (22.80%), 491 No (77.20%), Total 636
Key questions:
What overall % are we interested in? e.g., % with respiratory symptoms: 145/636 = 22.80% (Row % perspective) and % by gender: 335/636 = 52.67% female (Column % perspective)
Interpretation guidance:
Row % answers: "What proportion of each gender had respiratory symptoms?"
Column % answers: "What proportion of those with/without symptoms are female?"
In this case, row % is often more informative for symptoms by gender; column % answers were used to compare gender distribution across symptom status
Conclusion: choose the percent type that matches your question
Focus on types of data and corresponding summary statistics
Two categorical types of data to consider: Nominal and Ordinal; Numerical types: Discrete and Continuous
Resource links provided for further learning
Worked example datasets and interpretation (illustrative data)
Example data structure (Group, Consent, Gender, Shoulder ROM, Height):
Consent: n = 266 (96.0%); No consent: n = 11 (4.0%)
Gender: Male n = 131 (49.25%), Female n = 135 (50.75%)
Shoulder extension ROM: Mean = 65.4°, SD = 11.4, Range = 39° to 96°
Height: Mean = 170.3 cm, SD = 9.4 cm, Range = 145 cm to 193.2 cm
These illustrate reporting both counts and derived measures (means, SDs) for sample characteristics
Categorical data – Relative frequency example
Method of delivery for 600 babies: Normal 478 (79.7%), Forceps 65 (10.8%), Caesarean 57 (9.5%), Total 600 (100%)
Source: Essential Medical Statistics (Table 3.1)
Categorical data – Crosstab (summary concepts)
Crosstab tabulates counts in each combination of two categorical variables
Can compute:
Row percentages: percentages within each row (e.g., % ill by exposure within a row)
Column percentages: percentages within each column (e.g., % exposed among those with/without disease)
Example topic references: disease status by pesticide exposure (illustrative in the slides)
Numerical data – Descriptive statistics (continuous data)
Central tendency measures: mean, median, mode
Variation measures: SD, IQR, range
Choice depends on data distribution (normal vs skewed)
Note: The role of data checks and handling outliers is essential for credible statistics
Data checking and cleaning example
Real-world example: extreme BMI values (e.g., BMI > 48 kg/m^2) flagged as potential data entry errors
Process: verify height vs weight entries; correct misentries
Consequence of cleaning: improved plausibility of SD and other statistics
Types of graphs – practical guidance
Graphs should match data type and question:
Bar charts & Pie charts for categorical data
Scatter plots, Box plots, Histograms for numerical data
Understanding data type helps avoid misinterpretation and supports appropriate statistical summaries
End of pre-tutorial videos and notes
The slides are intended to prepare for table- and graph-based data interpretation in Monash Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences
Emphasis on turning raw data into meaningful, reportable statistics
Quick reference: key formulas and definitions used in this deck
Mean: ar{X} = rac{1}{n}
\sum{i=1}^n xi
Standard deviation (sample): s=n−11∑<em>i=1n(x</em>i−Xˉ)2
Interquartile range: extIQR=Q<em>3−Q</em>1
Box-plot quartiles: Q<em>1,Q</em>2(Median),Q3
1.5 x IQR rule for whiskers and outliers:
Lower whisker: Q1−1.5×IQR
Upper whisker: Q3+1.5×IQR
Outlier: value outside [Q<em>1−1.5×IQR,Q</em>3+1.5×IQR]
Extreme value: value outside [Q<em>1−3×IQR,Q</em>3+3×IQR]
Relative frequency: extRF=Nncategory×100%
Attack rate (illustrative epidemiology concept):
Attack rateexposed=a+ba where a = ill and exposed, b = not ill but exposed
Relative risk (RR):
RR=Attack rate</em>unexposedAttack rate<em>exposed=c/(c+d)a/(a+b) where c = ill and unexposed, d = not ill and unexposed
Note
The content above mirrors the structure and key concepts from the provided transcript, organized into comprehensive study notes with explicit emphasis on graph types, data types, and summary statistics, along with practical interpretation guidance and formulas where appropriate.