Health Care Financing: Allied Health
Private vs Public Spending
US health spending: government programs (Medicare/Medicaid/VA) are roughly similar in size to other countries with government systems, but private spending is dominant in the US.
Public vs private mix matters: private insurance drives most of the bills in the US; government programs provide leverage to lower prices via volume.
Price Setting and Bargaining Power
In the US, private insurers negotiate prices with hospitals/physicians separately; uninsured individuals have little bargaining power.
Government programs (Medicare/Medicaid) can demand lower prices due to pulling a large customer base; providers risk losing a large share of patients if they refuse.
Example: uninsured patients are charged much more for the same ER visit; one study found uninsured ER prices ~4× Medicare prices, illustrating the pricing gap.
How Other Countries Control Prices
In many countries, the government or a single payer sets prices for checks, MRIs, prescriptions, etc.
With centralized pricing, providers/hospitals/drug companies typically cannot refuse access to the market of public patients.
This centralized bargaining reduces prices compared to a fragmented private market.
Why Free Market Struggles in Health Care
Health care is often accessed under duress (emergency, a loved one, not fully informed).
Consumers rarely have the bargaining power or information to drive prices down; private-market pressure is weaker.
Result: the market fails to contain costs as effectively as in other sectors.
Single-Payer Considerations
Pros: centralized bargaining could push prices down and simplify administration.
Cons: could reduce pay to doctors/hospitals, risking closures or service reductions; political economy matters for price setting.
Not necessarily an all-or-nothing choice; intermediate models can exist.
Interim Medicare-for-All Plan (Bernie Sanders)
Proposal to expand Medicare to cover vision; open to nearly everyone; kids automatically enrolled.
Most adults would be able to buy in.
This step could start recognizing that government can do cheaper, more efficient health care, even if not a full single-payer overnight.
Core Takeaway
The irony: health care is so expensive partly because of the political power of private providers under the current system.
A government-led pricing/coverage approach can reduce costs, but design and implementation matter to avoid unintended consequences.