Defenses in Contracts
Defenses: Part 1
Overview of Legally Enforceable Contracts
Three requirements for a legally enforceable contract:
Agreement: An offer and acceptance must be present.
Consideration: There must be an exchange of something of legal value.
Lack of defenses: Defenses such as fraud, duress, undue influence, and mistake can render a contract unenforceable.
Understanding Defenses
Defenses can render a contract unenforceable:
The innocent party's duty to perform may be discharged if a valid defense is present.
Historical testing of contract defenses:
Defenses are a crucial area in contracts that are frequently tested. One key detail is that very few defenses make a contract void; most make it voidable at the option of the adversely affected party.
Key Pass Key: A Per Se (PIE) contract is void; all other defenses are voidable.
Types of Defenses: Fraud
Defense of Fraud requirements (M A I D S):
Misrepresentation of Material Fact:
The misrepresentation must concern a material fact rather than opinions.
Actual and Reasonable Reliance:
The victim must have reasonably relied on the misrepresentation; reliance on opinion is typically not reasonable.
Intent to Induce Reliance:
The defrauding party's purpose was to induce reliance.
Damages:
The defrauding party is liable for losses suffered due to the fraud, allowing for rescission or monetary damages, but not both.
Scienter (Intent to Deceive):
The misrepresentation must be made with intent to deceive, either knowingly or with reckless disregard for the truth.
Types of Defenses: Fraud in Execution vs. Fraud in Inducement
Fraud in the Execution:
Occurs when parties are deceived into signing something that is not a contract, thereby making the contract void due to a lack of a "meeting of the minds."
Fraud in the Inducement:
Involves misrepresentation regarding the terms of a contract that the defrauded party is aware of; it makes the contract voidable.
Types of Defenses: Innocent Misrepresentation
Definition of Innocent Misrepresentation:
Contains all elements of fraud except scienter.
The misrepresentation is made innocently, resulting in compensatory damages rather than punitive damages.
The contract is voidable by the party who relied on the misrepresentation.
Types of Defenses: Duress
Definition of Duress:
Occurs when a party’s free will is overcome by unlawful threats of harm.
If the threat involves physical force, the contract is void.
If the threat is economic or social, it is voidable.
Taking advantage of someone’s economic situation without threats is not duress.
Types of Defenses: Undue Influence
Definition of Undue Influence:
Exists when a party’s free will is overcome by the other’s abuse of a position of trust or confidence.
Fiduciary duty is present when parties are related; a transaction not at arm's length is a valid defense that makes the contract voidable.
Example: A lawyer convincing a client, who has an intellectual disability, to sell personal property would likely succeed in an undue influence defense.
Types of Defenses: Mutual Mistake
Definition:
When both parties are mistaken regarding a material fact, the adversely affected party can avoid the contract, excluding value disputes which are considered opinion-based.
Illustration of Mutual Mistake:
If Alex and Bob contract for a designer watch and later find out it's fake, Alex may avoid the contract.
Types of Defenses: Unilateral Mistake
Definition:
A mistake made by one party is generally not a defense unless the other party knew or should have known of the mistake.
Illustration of Unilateral Mistake:
If Sue knows the land cannot support a certain building height, but Tyler intends to build a taller structure, Tyler's unilateral mistake is not a defense unless Sue had reason to know.
Next Steps: Examination of Other Types of Defenses
Additional defenses include:
Illegality
Contracts involving minors
Intoxication
Adjudicated mental incompetency
Statute of limitations