Main Effects & Interactions

Makeup & Attractiveness Experiment (Psych 321321, Spring 20162016)

  • Question: Does makeup increase perceived attractiveness?
  • Design: between-subjects 2×12 \times 1
    • IV11: Makeup (present vs absent)
    • IV22: Rater Gender (male, female)
    • Stimuli: 55 identical female faces; attractiveness scale 111010
  • Overall means (collapsed across gender)
    • With makeup: 7.47.4
    • Without makeup: 7.37.3 ⇒ no main effect of makeup
  • Split by gender
    • Male raters: 7.97.9 (makeup) vs 7.37.3 (no makeup)
    • Female raters: 6.86.8 (makeup) vs 7.37.3 (no makeup)
  • Conclusion: Significant Makeup × Gender interaction; effect of makeup depends on rater gender (↑ for males, ↓ for females)

Core Concepts: Main Effect vs Interaction

  • Main effect: consistent influence of an IV on the DV after averaging over other IVs
  • Interaction: effect of one IV changes across levels of another IV
    "Effect of IV<em>1 depends on IV</em>2"\text{"Effect of IV}<em>1\text{ depends on IV}</em>2" ⇒ answers become “it depends”

Cell-Phone Use & Driving Study

  • Question: Does hands-free phone use impair braking, and does this vary with age?
  • Design: 2×22 \times 2 between-subjects
    • IV11: Phone Use (hands-free vs none)
    • IV22: Age Group (Younger 18182525 vs Older 65657474)
    • DV: Brake-onset time (ms) after obstacle appears (lower = better)
  • Findings
    • Main effect of Phone: Phone 1000\approx1000 ms vs No phone 850\approx850 ms
    • Main effect of Age: Older > Younger in all conditions
    • No Phone × Age interaction: phone slows both age groups by similar margin
  • Notable: Younger drivers on phone ≈ braking speed of older drivers off phone (functional “aging” of 50\sim50 years)

Quick Checklist for 22-IV Experiments

  • Examine graph/means:
    • Non-parallel lines → possible interaction
    • Vertical gap between averaged lines → main effect
  • Reporting order: each main effect (significant/not) → interaction (significant/not)
  • Interpretation guide:
    Interaction significant\text{Interaction significant} \Rightarrow describe pattern within each subgroup; main effects may mislead
    No interaction\text{No interaction} \Rightarrow main effects generalize across other IV

Exam Takeaways

  • Interactions reveal conditional relationships; always test them
  • Absence of a main effect can conceal opposing subgroup trends
  • When results answer “it depends,” a significant interaction is likely present