Health Behaviour and Behaviour change 2
Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) (Fishbein, 1967)
Core Constructs:
Subjective Norms: The perceived social pressure to engage or not engage in a behavior.
Beliefs: An individual's beliefs about the outcomes of the behavior.
Behavioral Intention: The likelihood of an individual performing a behavior, which is shaped by subjective norms and attitudes.
Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) (Ajzen, 1985)
Expansion of TRA: Introduces Perceived Behavioral Control to account for the influence of external factors.
Key Constructs:
Attitude Toward the Behavior: Personal evaluation of the behavior's outcomes (pros and cons).
Subjective Norms: Social influence or perceived expectations from significant others.
Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC): The perceived ease or difficulty of performing the behavior, which accounts for external factors that may hinder or facilitate action.
Behavioral Intention: The intention to engage in the behavior, which mediates between beliefs and actual behavior.
Questions to Guide TPB Constructs:
What do I believe about the behavior (attitude)?
What would significant others think of me doing it (subjective norm)?
Is it feasible for me to do it (perceived behavioral control)?
How strong is my intention to do it?
Pros and Cons:
Pros: Parsimonious, incorporates measurable constructs, supported by evidence (e.g., McEachan et al., 2011).
Cons: Does not address environmental factors, assumes rational behavior, based on self-report data with potential errors, intention does not always lead to behavior (intention-behavior gap, Armitage & Conner, 2001).
Transtheoretical Model (TTM) or Stages of Change Model (Prochaska & DiClemente, 1984)
Core Idea: Change occurs in stages, and people may cycle through these stages multiple times before achieving permanent change.
Stages:
Precontemplation: No intention to change within the next 6 months.
Contemplation: Aware of the behavior and considering change within the next 6 months.
Preparation (Determination): Ready to act within the next 30 days, planning steps to change.
Action: Actively changing behavior and modifying habits.
Maintenance: Sustained behavior change for over 6 months.
Termination: No desire to return to old behaviors; behavior change is now permanent.
Relapse: Return to previous behaviors; may involve recycling through earlier stages.
Key Concepts:
Decisional Balance: Weighing the pros and cons of change varies depending on the stage.
Stage-Matched Interventions: Tailoring interventions to match the individual's current stage can improve outcomes (e.g., smoking cessation).
Strengths:
Intuitive and easy to understand.
Effective in clinical settings, especially for addictions and behavioral changes.
Criticisms:
Lacks Social Context: Does not consider external social influences, such as drinking for social reasons (Marks et al., 2000).
Stage Classification: Not everyone fits into distinct stages (Budd & Rollnick, 1996).
Inconsistent Evidence: Limited and mixed evidence on effectiveness for substance use changes (Sutton, 2001).
Comparison and Use:
TRA is more suitable for analyzing intentions and the immediate factors affecting behavior but does not include external control factors.
TPB improves upon TRA by adding Perceived Behavioral Control, which is critical when there are barriers to behavior change (e.g., accessibility issues, skills).
TTM is useful for understanding behavior change as a process and tailoring interventions to the individual's readiness to change.