L10.1 Cognitive biases and

LEARNING OUTCOMES

  • Define key concepts in judgment and decision-making:   -

    • Judgment: Assessing the likelihood of various events based on incomplete information; accuracy is a key concern.   -

    • Decision-making: Choosing an option among alternatives; fundamental question is whether the right decision was made.

  • Identify different cognitive biases, including but not limited to:   -

  • Availability heuristic   - just bcs u see smt happening all the time doesnt mean it happens all the time

  • Representativeness heuristic   - judging by categorising a grp of ppl STEREOTYPES

  • Anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic   - judging based one the first piece of info u get U THINK THIS PERSON IS A GREAT GUY BCS HE DOES THE BARE MINIMUM WHEN IN FACT THERE ARE WAY BETTER GUYS OUT THERE

  • Confirmation bias: IGNORING OTHERS PERSPECTIVES AND ONLY PAYING ATTENTION TO WHAT YOU BELIEVE IN

  • Describe models explaining our judgment and decision-making processes.

DECISIONS, JUDGMENT, PROBLEM-SOLVING, ETC

  • Homo economicus: A theoretical concept in economics that describes a rational and self-interested individual.

  • Judgment: The process of deciding on the likelihood of various events with limited information; raises the question of accuracy.

  • Decision-making: The process of selecting an option; involves reflecting on whether the decision made was correct.

HEDGEHOGS VS MONET

  • Average behavior suggests that if you trust your instincts, you will choose the hedgehog; if you deliberate, you'll choose the Monet.

  • After six months, individuals with hedgehogs reported higher happiness than those with Monets.

  • Suggests that gut feelings can outperform deliberate thinking in behaviors.

POLL #2: THE BAT-AND-BALL PROBLEM

  • Question: A cricket bat and a cricket ball together cost $220, and the bat costs $200 more than the ball. What is the ball's cost?

  • Typical Incorrect Response: Participants often assume the ball costs $20 without proper calculation.

SOLUTIONS TO THE POLL #2

  • Correct Solution: The ball costs $10 and the bat costs $210.   - Breakdown: 210+10=220210 + 10 = 220 and 210−10=200210 - 10 = 200.

  • Frederick (2005) notes that naïve participants at American universities answered correctly only 41% of the time on similar problems.

  • Evidence of cognitive laziness when answering complex questions leads to simplified and incorrect responses.

KAHNEMAN & TVERSKY

  • Awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics.

  • Conceptualized cognitive illusions akin to perceptual illusions based on trade-offs between efficiency and accuracy.

  • Introduced Dual Process Theory (Kahneman, 2003):   - System 1: Focused on efficiency, fast, automatic, unconscious, effortless feelings of intuition; does most of the cognitive work.   - System 2: Focused on accuracy, slow, deliberate, effortful thinking; perceived as making choices, but tends to be lazy in execution.

RISK AVERSION

  • In decision-making involving risk, individuals displaying risk aversion would prefer a sure amount ($800) over a risky option (80% chance of $1000 and 20% chance of $100), despite the expected value being higher for the latter.

  • Average expected value from the second option is E=(0.8imes1000)+(0.2imes100)=820E = (0.8 imes 1000) + (0.2 imes 100) = 820.

  • Explains the presence of insurance companies, as humans often choose options that minimize risk.

LOSS AVERSION

  • When given a choice between two options involving potential loss versus a sure gain of $50, many will choose the sure gain despite the potential more considerable benefits of taking risks.

  • Indicates that humans are not homo economicus, as actual decision-making deviates from pure rationality expected in traditional economics.

REPRESENTATIVENESS HEURISTIC

  • E.g. If presented with a somewhat shy woman wearing glasses, participants are more likely to identify her as a librarian rather than considering probabilities (7000 librarians versus 1.2 million retail workers) despite her appearance suggesting a stereotype more than a statistical likelihood.

  • This bias stems from confusion between stereotype fit and actual probability.

ANCHORING EFFECT

  • The initial number given in a broader context (like population statistics) influences estimates of unrelated outcomes, creating biases through the anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic.

  • Example from polls: an initial population figure may sway estimates of future outcomes even if misapplied.

AVAILABILITY HEURISTIC

  • Freqencies of events are estimated based on how easily instances come to mind, promoting a skewed risk assessment or decisions based on vivid or recent experiences instead of hard factual data.

CONFIRMATION BIAS

  • In testing hypotheses, individuals display a tendency to seek information that supports their belief rather than seeking out disconfirming evidence, particularly evident in the 2-4-6 task from Wason (1960).

KARL POPPER AND CONFIRMATION BIAS

  • Popper's perspective: Science should strive to falsify hypotheses rather than confirm them; this principle is incredibly useful, though its application in practice may vary.

ISSUES WITH KAHNEMAN'S DUAL PROCESS THEORY

  • Critiques highlight oversimplification and vagueness in defining Systems 1 and 2, where their roles may shift based on specific tasks.

  • Initial characterization posited that System 1 operates in parallel while System 2 is serial, which may not hold true universally.

DE NEYS’ LOGICAL INTUITION MODEL

  • Proposes that judgment involves three distinct processes:   

    • - Rapid intuitive heuristic processing (System 1)   -

    • Intuitive logical processing   - When heuristics and logical outcomes diverge,

    • System 2 engages to resolve the conflict.

CASE STUDY: THE CHALLENGER DISASTER (1987)

  • Engineers from Morton Thiokol raised concerns about the O-rings' performance in cold weather but were pressured by NASA to reconsider their warnings.

  • The failure to act on these concerns at higher levels led to severe outcomes, illustrating the importance of proper information flow in decision-making.

MUSIC PSYC236 WEEK 13 LECTURE

  • LEARNING OUTCOMES:   - Understand sound waves and their translation into neural signals.   - Identify different aspects of music processing:     - Relative pitch     - Musical expectancies     - Melodic contour     - Dynamic attending   - Describe components of the ITPRA model.

WAVEFORMS

  • Sine Wave at 440Hz: Fundamental sound structure representing audio frequency.

THE AUDITORY SYSTEM - THE EAR

  • The outer ear shapes incoming sounds, the tympanic membrane converts sound waves into vibrations, and the middle ear bones (malleus, incus, stapes) amplify sound.

THE COCHLEA

  • Hair cells respond to soundwaves; different pitches activate different cochlear areas; lower pitches resonate further along the cochlea.

  • Sound processing allows us to group notes into chords and perceive harmonic structures.

CONSONANCE AND DISSONANCE

  • Musical harmony effects arise from mathematical relationships of frequencies between notes, like octaves and perfect fifths.

  • Natural occurrence of specific pitch relationships leads to entrainment in musical perception.

TIME IN MUSIC

  • Time organization is fundamental in music; rhythms help listeners predict the timing of notes.

RELATIVE PITCH

  • The capacity to recognize pitch relations rather than absolute frequencies is crucial in musical perception; it enables melody consistency across varying keys.

ABSOLUTE PITCH

  • 'Absolute pitch' refers to the ability to identify or recreate a given musical note, although many have an innate sense of pitch without explicit identification.

MELODIC CONTOUR

  • Melodies distinguishable by their 'ups and downs'; non-musicians can perceive these changes without formal training, highlighting contour importance in melody perception.

MUSICAL EXPECTANCIES

  • The brain forms expectations based on prior musical experiences; this dictates emotional responses, where deviations from expectations create dynamic tension and interest in music.

ITPRA MODEL OF MUSIC EMOTION

  • David Huron’s ITPRA model posits emotional responses to music result from interactions between various types of musical expectations, leading to physiological reactions during unexpected musical events.

CHORUS OF TINY DANCER

  • Emotional engagement is heightened in familiar pop structures, such as tension build-ups leading to satisfying resolutions.