Federalism Part 1
Introduction to Federalism
Definition of Federalism:
Refers to a system of layered government, akin to a pyramid structure.
Top Layer: National government located in Washington, D.C.
Consists of Congress, the President, and the Supreme Court.
Middle Layer: State governments from various states.
Bottom Layer: Local governments which include towns, cities, counties, and school districts.
The interplay between these layers is what is referred to as federalism.
Terminology
Federal Government:
Typically refers specifically to the national government in Washington, D.C.
Essential to differentiate between "federal government" and the broader concept of federalism.
Importance of Federalism
Foundational aspect of the American government system.
The nature of the relationships between federal and state levels is nuanced and ambiguous.
Historical and ongoing changes in these relationships are reflective of the Constitution's vagueness.
Powers within Federalism
National Government Powers:
Exclusive Powers of the National Government:
Coin money: Only the national government can create currency.
Conduct foreign affairs: States cannot establish diplomatic relations.
Declare war: Exclusive power of the national government.
State Powers:
Exclusive Powers of the States:
Control the time, manner, and place of elections: States oversee polling places and registration processes.
Public health, safety, and morals: States manage licensing for professions (doctors, lawyers, etc.).
Law enforcement: Primarily a state and local responsibility.
Establish local governments: States have authority to create counties and cities.
Concurrent Powers:
Shared Powers between State and National Governments:
Taxation: Both levels can levy taxes.
Borrowing Money: Both can incur debt.
Establishing Courts: Both can create judicial systems.
Establishing Banks: Both can incorporate banking institutions.
Ambiguities in Federal Relationships
Interstate Commerce Regulation:
The Interstate Commerce Clause empowers Congress to regulate commerce between states.
There is ambiguity about if and how states can also regulate commerce.
Morality and State Regulation:
States historically regulated moral issues (e.g., marriage).
Supreme Court rulings have clarified some of these moral regulations (e.g., interracial and same-sex marriage).
Funding Responsibilities:
Questions arise about who pays for federally mandated state programs (e.g., education).
States may be required to implement federal laws without adequate funding from the national government.
Historical Context of Federalism
Period of Dual Federalism (1789 - 1937):
Definition of Dual Federalism:
Characterized by a clear separation of powers between state and national governments akin to layers in a cake.
Each level of government had distinct areas of jurisdiction, with limited overlap.
National Government Responsibilities During This Period:
Focused primarily on tariffs, infrastructure (roads, railroads), protecting patents, and limited regulation of commerce.
Emphasis on state control over areas like education and local governance.
Supreme Court's Role in Defining Relationships:
Several landmark cases established the boundaries of dual federalism:
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819):
Issue: Maryland attempted to tax a federal bank.
Ruling: States cannot tax federal institutions. This clarified the powers and boundaries set by the Constitution.
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824):
Issue: New York monopoly on ferry service impacting interstate commerce.
Ruling: New York could not grant a monopoly because it violates Congress's exclusive right to regulate interstate commerce.
Dred Scott Decision (1857):
Issue: Constitutionality of Congress prohibiting slavery in new territories.
Ruling: Congress overstepped its authority; states should determine their own laws regarding slavery. This highlights the balance of power issues and the respective authorities of state vs. federal government.
Conclusion of Dual Federalism:
The period ended due to the Great Depression, leading to significant changes in federal involvement in state affairs.
This shift will be addressed in future discussions regarding the evolution of the federal system.