Lecture 10: Self-Esteem
Self-Esteem: The Holy Grail of Psychology?
The Self-Esteem Craze
Historical Overview:
1983: John Vasconcellos rises to prominence advocating self-esteem.
1986: Task Force to Promote Self-Esteem and Personal and Social Responsibility established.
1990: Report titled "Toward A State Of Self-Esteem" released highlighting the importance of self-esteem in society.
Correlation and Implications
High Self-Esteem (SE) Correlates with:
Happiness
Productivity
Success
Low Self-Esteem Correlates with:
Crime
Teen pregnancy
Environmental pollution
An assertion made: "All of society's ills can be explained by an epidemic of low self-esteem".
The Self-Esteem Movement
Prominent Publications and Authors:
Matthew McKay, Patrick Fanning – "Self-Esteem: Understanding and Improving the Way We Think and Feel About Ourselves".
M. Scott Peck – "A New Psychology of Love, Traditional Values and Spiritual Growth".
Andrew M. Mecca – Edited works on self-esteem.
Methodological Issues in Measuring Self-Esteem
Challenges in Measurement:
Various scales lead to difficulties in comparing research results.
Empty results may arise from inconsistent measures.
Key Authors Mentioned:
Roy Baumeister, Blascovich, and Tomaka (1991) suggest uneven quality in self-esteem measures.
Defining Self-Esteem
William James's Perspective:
Defined as a fraction: self-esteem = success / pretensions
Suggestions to increase self-esteem include reducing pretensions or increasing actual successes.
Types of Self-Esteem
Distinctions in Self-Esteem:
State vs Trait:
State: Current feelings.
Trait: General level across situations.
Global vs Specific:
Global focuses on overall self-value; Specific focuses on self-evaluations in certain life areas.
Implicit vs Explicit:
Implicit is unconscious perceptions; Explicit is conscious self-evaluation.
Developmental Aspects of Self-Esteem
Trends Over Time:
Increase in self-esteem post-adolescence, peaking around age 60, then declining around 70.
Influences include home environment quality and parental care.
Correlation vs Causation
Understanding Relationships:
Importance of determining whether high SE causes positive outcomes or merely correlates with them.
Need for theoretical frameworks, such as Self-Verification Theory, Sociometer Theory, and Terror Management Theory.
Sociometer Theory:
Suggests self-esteem functions to monitor relational value and acceptance in social groups.
Aggression and Self-Esteem
Contradictory Findings:
High self-esteem may also relate to aggression under certain conditions.
Criminal behavior often associated with high (but unstable) self-esteem.
Variability in results regarding social behaviors: high SE can predict both aggression and social initiative.
Researcher Bias in Self-Esteem Studies
Examples of Bias:
John Vasconcellos’s political ties with self-esteem theories may influence research objectivity.
Calls for controlled examination of findings that align with self-esteem’s significance.
Nature of Healthy Self-Esteem
Fragile vs Stable SE:
Fragile Self-Esteem: Fluctuates based on external validation.
Stable Self-Esteem: Remains constant, associated with psychological clarity.
Optimal Self-Esteem (Kernis):
Described as self-esteem derived from authenticity and intrinsic worth.
Encourages engagement in mindfulness and flow experiences to foster genuine self-regard.