Law, Governance & Sustainability- Week 3 Lecture

Introduction

  • Week 33 of the unit; final week of “foundations”.
  • Guest lecturer: Professor Felicity Dean (Law School; teaches Taxation Law, researches economic instruments, trade & climate change).
  • Topic focus: Law, Policy, Governance & Sustainability.
  • Acknowledgement of Country: Traditional Owners – Tarrawal and Jagera peoples.

Lecture Structure & Logistics

  • One–hour slot with many definitions; easy → hard order.
  • Q&A options: after class or via email (to be posted on Canvas).
  • Upcoming Lunch-and-Learn: meet 11:3011{:}30, starts 12:0012{:}00; 5050 students on wait-list, cancel early if unable to attend.
  • Next week = Ekka Public Holiday → no live lecture; pre-recorded podcasts will replace it.

Essential Terminology

Legislation

  • Formal, binding rules enacted by parliament.
  • Clear procedure; black-letter law; studied in Law 101101.

Policy

  • “Stated goal/objective”; can be governmental, organisational, or personal.
  • May be achieved through legislation or other means.
  • Used by courts to interpret legislation, but non-binding if not embedded in statute.
  • Election example: net-zero emissions by 20502050, nuclear-power debate.

Regulation

  • Term has multiple usages:
    • Interchangeable with “legislation” in casual speech (e.g., “environmental regs”).
    • Delegated/secondary legislation (Capital-R Regulations).
    • Course definition (LAWS 108108): “Any rule endorsed by government with an expectation of compliance.”
  • Broader than legislation; can include standards, self-regulatory codes, industry circulars, incentive mechanisms, technology-based limits (e-scooter speed-limiter).

Governance

  • Broader again; concerns who makes decisions & how problems are addressed.
  • Elements: decision rules, accountability pathways, power boundaries, cultural shaping.
  • Can be framed by:
    • A specific problem (e.g., point-source vs non-point-source pollution).
    • A whole entity (state governance, corporate governance, sport governance).

Comparing the Four Terms

  • Policy = goal/plan.
  • Legislation = formal rules.
  • Regulation = broader rule-set endorsed by state, expectation of compliance.
  • Governance = structures & actors that create/apply policy, legislation, regulation.

Illustrative Examples

  • Legislation: Criminal Code, Environmental Protection Act 19941994 (Qld).
  • Delegated regulation: EP Act’s regulation-making power.
  • Industry self-regulation: media codes, professional standards.
  • Tech-based regulation: e-scooter software speed caps.
  • Point-source pollution: asbestos dumped from a single facility.
  • Non-point pollution: greenhouse emissions causing climate change.

Readings Overview

Gunningham Chapter (≈ 3030 pages)

  • Traces shift: Law → Regulation → Governance continuum.
  • Historical arc: state-centric environmental law → multi-actor governance.
  • Introduces neoliberalism (market freedom, minimal state).
    • Promoted by Thatcher & Reagan (19801980s); resurfaces in deregulation debates (e.g., Morrison Govt Deregulation Taskforce).
  • Concept of regulatory capture: industry lobbying ≈ watering-down rules.
  • Key thesis: “Smart mixes” work best only if backed by a credible “gorilla in the closet” (strict enforceable legislation).
  • Climate change cited as “greatest market failure”; lack of adequate regulation.

Bell & James Article

  • Focus: enforceability of policy under the Environment Protection & Biodiversity Conservation Act (EPBC)(EPBC) 19991999 (Cth).
  • Distinguishes binding legislative duties vs non-binding ministerial policies.
Cases Discussed
  1. (Unnamed) Minister reconsideration case – decision remitted, same outcome once policy “considered”.
  2. JP Highway Extension – Minister approved project with offsets; challengers argued offsets should be “last resort”. Court held offset policy non-enforceable because not in statute.
  • Conclusion: critical policies (e.g., offsets “mitigation hierarchy”) need embedding in legislation; echoed by 20202020 Samuel Review of EPBC Act.

Sustainability & Environmental Regulation

  • Three classic drivers:
    1. Resource conservation (secure future supply).
    2. Human harm prevention (pollution, waste).
    3. Protection of remaining natural assets.
  • Conflict: rules may limit certain industries → lobbying for “cutting red\text{red} / green\text{green} tape”.

Economic Theory Foundations

Externalities

  • Negative externality: cost imposed on third parties (e.g., pollution).
  • Solution (Pigou, 19201920s): internalise cost via Pigovian tax.
  • Alternative (Dales, 19601960s): assign property rights & allow cap-and-trade → market finds efficient price.

Neoliberalism

  • Favors deregulation, small government, free trade; critiques: environmental degradation, climate inaction.

Regulatory Instruments Typology

CategoryEssenceExample
Command-and-ControlDirect rule + penaltyEPA (Qld) s319\text{EPA (Qld) }s\,319 "general environmental duty" – fine if breached
Economic InstrumentsChange \ costs/benefitsTaxes, subsidies, offsets, emissions trading
Market-Based Sub-setCreates tradable rightsCarbon credit schemes, cap-and-trade
Self-RegulationIndustry codes with state threatMedia standards + looming statutory penalties
InformationalDisclosure expecting complianceIndustry circulars, eco-labels

Offsets as Economic Instruments

  • Definition: compensate environmental harm at site AA by positive action at site BB (ideally “like-for-like”).
  • Found federally & in all jurisdictions; intended last resort.
  • Cost must be purchased (changes project’s financial calculus).
  • Problems: non-equivalence, leakage, monitoring challenges, unenforceable if only in policy.

Carbon Pricing & Australian Experience

  • CPM 201220142012–2014: fixed-price phase\text{phase} → intended transition to emissions trading; labelled “carbon tax”.
  • Safeguard Mechanism (current): baseline-and-credit, not full cap-and-trade. Entities buy Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) if exceeding baseline.
  • Subsidies: fossil-fuel tax concessions counteract climate aims (perverse economic instrument).

“Smart Mix” Principle

  • Combine:
    • Strict back-stop law (command-and-control).
    • Flexible tools (economic instruments, self-regulation, info).
  • Especially vital for non-point pollution (e.g., climate change) where single-source enforcement is impractical.

Practical / Ethical Implications

  • Who pays? Cost distribution between polluters, consumers, society, future generations.
  • Governance shapes culture: power dynamics, accountability, public trust.
  • Ineffective rules → biodiversity loss, climate risk, long-term productivity decline.

Connections to Upcoming Content

  • Week 99: deep dive into EPBC Act.
  • Next lecture (after holiday): corporate governance & sustainability (Monica).
  • Tutorials: apply Gunningham & Bell-James arguments; know definitions & case facts.

Final Reminders

  • Readings: prioritise key points above, but full texts enhance comprehension.
  • Email questions; watch for Canvas announcement with meet-up spot for Lunch-and-Learn.
  • Podcasts uploaded next week due to public holiday — no live class.