Law, Governance & Sustainability- Week 3 Lecture
Introduction
- Week 3 of the unit; final week of “foundations”.
- Guest lecturer: Professor Felicity Dean (Law School; teaches Taxation Law, researches economic instruments, trade & climate change).
- Topic focus: Law, Policy, Governance & Sustainability.
- Acknowledgement of Country: Traditional Owners – Tarrawal and Jagera peoples.
Lecture Structure & Logistics
- One–hour slot with many definitions; easy → hard order.
- Q&A options: after class or via email (to be posted on Canvas).
- Upcoming Lunch-and-Learn: meet 11:30, starts 12:00; 50 students on wait-list, cancel early if unable to attend.
- Next week = Ekka Public Holiday → no live lecture; pre-recorded podcasts will replace it.
Essential Terminology
Legislation
- Formal, binding rules enacted by parliament.
- Clear procedure; black-letter law; studied in Law 101.
Policy
- “Stated goal/objective”; can be governmental, organisational, or personal.
- May be achieved through legislation or other means.
- Used by courts to interpret legislation, but non-binding if not embedded in statute.
- Election example: net-zero emissions by 2050, nuclear-power debate.
Regulation
- Term has multiple usages:
- Interchangeable with “legislation” in casual speech (e.g., “environmental regs”).
- Delegated/secondary legislation (Capital-R Regulations).
- Course definition (LAWS 108): “Any rule endorsed by government with an expectation of compliance.”
- Broader than legislation; can include standards, self-regulatory codes, industry circulars, incentive mechanisms, technology-based limits (e-scooter speed-limiter).
Governance
- Broader again; concerns who makes decisions & how problems are addressed.
- Elements: decision rules, accountability pathways, power boundaries, cultural shaping.
- Can be framed by:
- A specific problem (e.g., point-source vs non-point-source pollution).
- A whole entity (state governance, corporate governance, sport governance).
Comparing the Four Terms
- Policy = goal/plan.
- Legislation = formal rules.
- Regulation = broader rule-set endorsed by state, expectation of compliance.
- Governance = structures & actors that create/apply policy, legislation, regulation.
Illustrative Examples
- Legislation: Criminal Code, Environmental Protection Act 1994 (Qld).
- Delegated regulation: EP Act’s regulation-making power.
- Industry self-regulation: media codes, professional standards.
- Tech-based regulation: e-scooter software speed caps.
- Point-source pollution: asbestos dumped from a single facility.
- Non-point pollution: greenhouse emissions causing climate change.
Readings Overview
Gunningham Chapter (≈ 30 pages)
- Traces shift: Law → Regulation → Governance continuum.
- Historical arc: state-centric environmental law → multi-actor governance.
- Introduces neoliberalism (market freedom, minimal state).
- Promoted by Thatcher & Reagan (1980s); resurfaces in deregulation debates (e.g., Morrison Govt Deregulation Taskforce).
- Concept of regulatory capture: industry lobbying ≈ watering-down rules.
- Key thesis: “Smart mixes” work best only if backed by a credible “gorilla in the closet” (strict enforceable legislation).
- Climate change cited as “greatest market failure”; lack of adequate regulation.
Bell & James Article
- Focus: enforceability of policy under the Environment Protection & Biodiversity Conservation Act (EPBC) 1999 (Cth).
- Distinguishes binding legislative duties vs non-binding ministerial policies.
Cases Discussed
- (Unnamed) Minister reconsideration case – decision remitted, same outcome once policy “considered”.
- JP Highway Extension – Minister approved project with offsets; challengers argued offsets should be “last resort”. Court held offset policy non-enforceable because not in statute.
- Conclusion: critical policies (e.g., offsets “mitigation hierarchy”) need embedding in legislation; echoed by 2020 Samuel Review of EPBC Act.
Sustainability & Environmental Regulation
- Three classic drivers:
- Resource conservation (secure future supply).
- Human harm prevention (pollution, waste).
- Protection of remaining natural assets.
- Conflict: rules may limit certain industries → lobbying for “cutting red / green tape”.
Economic Theory Foundations
Externalities
- Negative externality: cost imposed on third parties (e.g., pollution).
- Solution (Pigou, 1920s): internalise cost via Pigovian tax.
- Alternative (Dales, 1960s): assign property rights & allow cap-and-trade → market finds efficient price.
Neoliberalism
- Favors deregulation, small government, free trade; critiques: environmental degradation, climate inaction.
Regulatory Instruments Typology
| Category | Essence | Example |
|---|
| Command-and-Control | Direct rule + penalty | EPA (Qld) s319 "general environmental duty" – fine if breached |
| Economic Instruments | Change \ costs/benefits | Taxes, subsidies, offsets, emissions trading |
| Market-Based Sub-set | Creates tradable rights | Carbon credit schemes, cap-and-trade |
| Self-Regulation | Industry codes with state threat | Media standards + looming statutory penalties |
| Informational | Disclosure expecting compliance | Industry circulars, eco-labels |
Offsets as Economic Instruments
- Definition: compensate environmental harm at site A by positive action at site B (ideally “like-for-like”).
- Found federally & in all jurisdictions; intended last resort.
- Cost must be purchased (changes project’s financial calculus).
- Problems: non-equivalence, leakage, monitoring challenges, unenforceable if only in policy.
Carbon Pricing & Australian Experience
- CPM 2012–2014: fixed-price phase → intended transition to emissions trading; labelled “carbon tax”.
- Safeguard Mechanism (current): baseline-and-credit, not full cap-and-trade. Entities buy Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) if exceeding baseline.
- Subsidies: fossil-fuel tax concessions counteract climate aims (perverse economic instrument).
“Smart Mix” Principle
- Combine:
- Strict back-stop law (command-and-control).
- Flexible tools (economic instruments, self-regulation, info).
- Especially vital for non-point pollution (e.g., climate change) where single-source enforcement is impractical.
Practical / Ethical Implications
- Who pays? Cost distribution between polluters, consumers, society, future generations.
- Governance shapes culture: power dynamics, accountability, public trust.
- Ineffective rules → biodiversity loss, climate risk, long-term productivity decline.
Connections to Upcoming Content
- Week 9: deep dive into EPBC Act.
- Next lecture (after holiday): corporate governance & sustainability (Monica).
- Tutorials: apply Gunningham & Bell-James arguments; know definitions & case facts.
Final Reminders
- Readings: prioritise key points above, but full texts enhance comprehension.
- Email questions; watch for Canvas announcement with meet-up spot for Lunch-and-Learn.
- Podcasts uploaded next week due to public holiday — no live class.