The Remainder Theorem and Synthetic Division
Fundamental Concept of the Remainder Theorem
- The Remainder Theorem provides a specific relationship between a polynomial function and its division by a linear factor.
- If a polynomial function f(x) is divided by a linear factor of the form (x−c), the resulting remainder is equal to the value of the function evaluated at c, denoted as f(c).
- This principle holds true whether the division is performed using synthetic division or long division.
- The theorem is practically useful because evaluating a function through synthetic division is often significantly faster and less prone to calculation errors than direct substitution, especially for higher-degree polynomials.
Example 1: Evaluating f(x)=2x3−5x2+6x−12 at x=4
Method 1: Direct Substitution (The "Old-Fashioned Way")
- The goal is to evaluate f(4) by replacing every instance of x with the number 4
- Equation: f(4)=2(4)3−5(4)2+6(4)−12
- Step-by-step calculation:
- Evaluate 43: 4×4=16 and 16×4=64
- Evaluate 42: 4×4=16
- Multiply terms:
- 2×64=128
- 5×16: Calculated as (5×10)+(5×6)=50+30=80
- 6×4=24
- Combine results:
- f(4)=128−80+24−12
- The speaker simplifies 24−12=12
- 128−80=48 (derived from 12−8=4 and 8−0=8)
- 48+12=60
- Final result: f(4)=60
Method 2: Synthetic Division Confirmation
- Coefficients are extracted from the polynomial: 2,−5,6,−12.
- The divisor/evaluative point is 4.
- Procedure (Multiply, Add, Repeat):
- Bring down the first coefficient: 2.
- Multiply 4×2=8.
- Add −5+8=3.
- Multiply 4×3=12.
- Add 6+12=18.
- Multiply 4×18: Calculated as (4×10)+(4×8)=40+32=72
- Add the final constant term: −12+72=60.
- Conclusion: The remainder is 60, which matches f(4), confirming the theorem.
Example 2: Polynomial with Missing Terms and Placeholders
- Given function: f(x)=3x4−7x3−9x+12.
- Goal: Evaluate f(5).
- Crucial Step: Notice there is no x2 term in the expression. To perform synthetic division, a placeholder of 0x2 must be inserted.
Synthetic Division Process
- Coefficients used: 3,−7,0,−9,12.
- Divisor: 5.
- Steps:
- Bring down 3.
- 5×3=15.
- −7+15=8.
- 5×8=40.
- 0+40=40.
- 5×40=200.
- −9+200=191.
- 5×191: Calculated as 5×(200−9)=1000−45=955.
- 12+955=967.
- Remainder: 967. Therefore, f(5)=967.
Confirmation via Substitution
- Expression: f(5)=3(5)4−7(5)3−9(5)+12
- Powers of 5:
- 51=5
- 52=25
- 53=125
- 54=625
- Calculations:
- 3×625: Calculated as (3×600)+(3×25)=1800+75=1875
- 7×125: Calculated via the "seven quarters" metaphor as 700+175=875
- Subtraction: 1875−875=1000
- Final steps: 1000−45+12=955+12=967.
Example 3: evaluating 2x4−x2+30 at x=3
- The speaker evaluates the expression at x=3 using synthetic division first.
Synthetic Division Execution
- Coefficients identified (including placeholders for x3 and x1): 2,0,−3,0,30.
- Note: While the spoken equation is 2x4−x2+30, the speaker uses −3 as the coefficient for x2 during the demonstration.
- Steps:
- Bring down 2: Result is 2.
- 3×2=6; 0+6=6.
- 3×6=18; −3+18=15.
- 3×15=45; 0+45=45.
- 3×45: Calculated as (3×40)+(3×5)=120+15=135.
- 135+30=165.
- Remainder: 165.
Checking the Answer
- Substitution expression used: f(3)=2(3)4−3(3)2+13
- Note: There is a discrepancy between the stated equation and the check, but calculations proceed based on the synth division result.
- Evaluate powers: 34=81 (3×3×3×3 is 9×9) and 32=9.
- Calculations:
- 2×81=162
- 3×9=27
- The speaker combines −27+30=3 (correcting the constant term to 30 during analysis).
- 162+3=165.
Instructional Interaction and Encouragement
- Throughout the tutorial, the speaker encourages active participation, suggesting viewers "feel free to pause the video" to attempt the synthetic division independently before viewing the solution.
- The speaker emphasizes that synthetic division is a reliable shortcut for finding values of complex functions at specific points without lengthy algebraic expansions.