Philosophy 2660 Midterm Study Notes
Review for Philosophy 2660 Midterm
I. Aristotle (384–322 BC): Metaphysics, Physics, and Astronomy
Purpose of Studying Aristotle
Examines the relevance of Aristotle's contributions despite the focus on 17th-century dramatic shifts in physics and philosophy.
Form and Matter
Characterization:
Form: The essence or nature of a thing.
Matter: The substance or material from which something is made.
Relationship:
Form identifies the nature of a thing; it is what gives shape and purpose to matter.
Actuality and Potentiality
Relationship between form/matter and actuality/potentiality:
Actuality: The realization of potential; a thing that is fully developed.
Potentiality: The capacity for change or development; the possibility inherent in matter.
Four Causes
Explanation of Aristotle's four causes:
Material Cause: What something is made of.
Formal Cause: The form or design of the thing.
Efficient Cause: The agent or source that brings something into existence.
Final Cause: The purpose or goal of the thing.
Comparison:
Construction of an artifact vs. development of an organism reflects different applications of the four causes.
Teleology and Final Causation
Role of teleology in Aristotle’s philosophy:
Explains the purposeful nature of existence and development in organisms and artifacts.
Contrast with Other Views:
Eliminativism (denies purpose) vs. Intentionalism (attributes purpose).
Plenum vs. Vacuum
Does Aristotle believe a vacuum exists?
No, he argues that nature abhors a vacuum; space cannot exist without matter.
Aristotle’s Universe System
Key components of Aristotle's cosmology:
Geocentrism: Earth is at the center of the universe.
Sublunar and Celestial Realms: Distinction between earthly, changeable matter and heavenly, unchangeable matter.
Nested Spheres: Spheres that move the sun, planets, and stars in circular orbits.
Four Elements: Earth, water, air, fire, each with natural places and motions.
II. Ptolemy, the Copernican Revolution, and Other Crucial Astronomical Developments
Ptolemy’s System
Astronomical phenomenon of retrogression: The apparent backward motion of planets.
Technical Devices: Various inventions in mathematical astronomy, like the epicycle.
Equants: Introduced to improve the accuracy of predictions in Ptolemaic astronomy, differing from previous uniform circular motions.
Mathematical vs. Physical Astronomy
Divergence:
Mathematical astronomy focuses on calculations and models; physical astronomy concerns the actual nature and explanation of celestial bodies.
Copernicus’ Assumptions
Overview of Copernican assumptions:
Central position of the sun, circular orbits, rotation of earth causing daily motion, etc.
Importance: These assumptions fundamentally shift the understanding of the universe.
Copernicus on Retrogression
His explanation: Retrogression occurs due to the earth’s orbit overtaking another planet’s orbit, leading to perceived backward motion.
Contrast of Ptolemy and Copernicus
Explanation of proximity of sun, Mercury, and Venus differs significantly in their models due to orbital mechanics.
Distance of Stars in Copernican System
Stars must be extremely far to maintain the celestial order and the observed motions of planets.
Earth's Motions According to Copernicus
Three motions:
Daily rotation on its axis.
Annual revolution around the sun.
Axial tilt changing seasonal positions (third motion posited to explain varying night sky visibility).
Advantages and Disadvantages of Copernicus' System
Advantages: Simplifies the mathematical elegance of celestial mechanics aspects.
Disadvantages: Some implications may contradict observations of daily life at that time.
Novel Elements in Copernican System
Introduction of heliocentrism while retaining some Aristotelian components (e.g. circular orbits).
Osiander's Recommendations
Suggested that Copernicus' system be understood as a mathematical model rather than a physical reality; unclear if Copernicus agreed.
Kepler’s Great Innovation
Formulated laws of planetary motion, including elliptical orbits, fundamentally altering astronomical studies.
Observations Undermining Aristotelian Astronomy
New telescopic discoveries, such as moons of Jupiter and phases of Venus, contested old notions of celestial bodies.
III. Galileo (1564-1642) on Heliocentrism and Motion
Galileo’s Major Contributions
Known for championing heliocentrism, motion physics, and observational astronomy.
Galileo’s View of Inertia
Proposes that a body in motion stays in motion unless acted upon by an external force, contradicting Aristotelian notions of motion.
Aristotelian Arguments Against Earth’s Motion
Included examples from:
Dropping a cannonball, shooting cannons, observing birds, and the effects of wind on the earth’s surface.
Aristotelians viewed these as strong evidence against earth motion.
Principle of Inertia
Used to challenge Aristotelian arguments; demonstrates that motion does not require a medium (like air).
Galileo’s Boat Example
Illustration from Dialogues illustrating principles of relativity in motion is significant for understanding inertial frames.
Galileo on Biblical Interpretation
Took a controversial stance advocating that natural philosophy should not contradict scripture, resulting in conflict with religious authorities.