SB

Racial Bias and Segregation

Daniel Kelly and Erica Redder - Implicit Racial Bias

  • Daniel Kelly:
    • Philosopher at Purdue University. PhD from Rutgers in 2007.
    • Research: Philosophy of mind, cognitive science, moral theory.
  • Erica Redder:
    • PhD from NYU, postdoctoral fellow at Occidental College.
    • Specializations: Feminist philosophy, biomedical ethics, philosophy of psychology.

Implicit Racial Bias

  • Definition: Negative associations people make with other races, often without awareness or endorsement.
  • People may hold implicit biases despite sincerely professing tolerant or anti-racist views.
  • Reported views on race are not a reliable indicator of implicit bias.
  • Tested using the Implicit Association Test (IAT).

Implicit Association Test (IAT)

  • Measures implicit biases by asking subjects to group racial groups with "good" and "bad" terms under timed conditions.
  • Faster, more accurate performance when grouping "good" items with "white" names may indicate an automatic preference for white people.

Real-World Relevance of Implicit Biases

  • Bias in Hiring Practices: Resumes with traditionally black-sounding names receive 50% fewer callbacks.
    • Highly qualified white applicants receive 30% more callbacks than less qualified counterparts.
    • Little difference in callbacks between highly and less qualified black resumes.
    • Occurs even in explicitly equal opportunity employers.
  • Weapon Bias/Shooter Bias: People shown a black face are more likely to misidentify a harmless object as a gun.
    • Law enforcement officers making split-second decisions may mistakenly perceive a person of color as a threat and shoot them.

Ethical Implications

  • Question: Are implicit biases morally problematic? (Even without ill intent)
  • Implicit biases have serious negative consequences leading to harmful and unfair behaviors.
  • If implicit bias leads to the shooting of an innocent person of color, it is "bad" due to those harms.
  • Key ethical question: To what extent should someone be held morally blameworthy for actions stemming from implicit biases?
    • Difficulty lies in intention; reluctance to blame someone unaware of their biases.
  • Kelly and Redder suggest that if implicit biases oppose benevolence or justice, there may be grounds for holding someone responsible.

Responding to Implicit Biases

  • Acknowledge that they exist and change actions accordingly.
    • Analogy: Like accounting for optical illusions.
  • Practical steps to counteract bias:
    • Anonymize resumes or grading to remove knowledge of race or gender.
    • Grade anonymously to avoid bias related to student participation or attendance.
  • Moral accountability may lie in how one responds to the existence of implicit associations and changes behavior accordingly.

Elizabeth Anderson - Racial Segregation

  • Philosophy professor at the University of Michigan, PhD from Harvard.
  • Research: Ethics, moral psychology, political philosophy.
  • Anderson argues for putting integration back on the public agenda.
    • Counterarguments: Some claim current segregation is voluntary.
    • Others express disillusionment with integration and defend self-segregation.

Stages of Integration

  • Formal Desegregation: Absence of laws permitting segregation (largely achieved in the US).
  • Spatial Integration: Members of different races living in the same areas.
  • Formal Social Integration: Full cooperation in institutionally defined social roles (e.g., workplace, military, classrooms), with all races occupying all roles in sufficient numbers.
  • Informal Social Integration: Cooperation, welcome, trust, and affiliation beyond organizational roles (e.g., friendships, dating, marriage, adoption).
  • Stages are ranked in order of difficulty.

Harms of Segregation

  • Harms dignity of those segregated.
  • Leads to racial aversion, ideas of racial superiority, stigmatization, or fear.
  • Integration increases respect and readiness to welcome others as equal partners.
  • Increased integration can help reduce implicit racial bias through familiarity and diverse representation.

Socioeconomic Opportunity

  • Spatial mismatch of residences and jobs leads to high unemployment and commuting costs.
  • White flight leads to housing depreciation and unwillingness of businesses to open in those neighborhoods.
  • Social segregation limits networking and economic opportunities, hindering hiring and promotion.

Undermines Democracy

  • Citizens need to share experiences and concerns and work out common problems.
  • Gerrymandering segregates individuals, impacting the ability to govern democratically.