TOPIC 1.1 - ENVIRONMENTAL VALUE SYSTEMS
EVS (def). a worldview or paradigm that shapes the way an individual perceives and evaluates environmental issues
influenced by culture, education, religion, economic context, societal context and political context
imposes certain intrinsic values on things like the environment, technology and society
ANTHROPOCENTRIC
in the middle of both views
requires societies to manage their own environmental impact
use of taxes, legislation and environmental regulation to solve or manage environmental problems
centered on humanity and its relationship with nature
humans have the responsibility to sustainably manage the environment
most prominent environmental value system within western societies
believe that humans can control and manage resources to sustain us and the earth
TECHNOCENTRIC
places value on technological solutions to environmental problems
believes that research and scientific development are necessary to solve environmental problems
cornucopians (def). extreme technocentrists - may believe that technology based solutions are the only solutions for environmental problems
sees humans as the dominant species on earth
“whatever we do, we can solve it”
CONRUCOPIANS
subset of the technocentric view
earth is there to benefit humanity and will always have enough resources to sustain us
thinks that humans will keep advancing enough to confront any problem that arises from unsustainable resource management or other practices
often believe that capitalism and a free market economy is also the best move for humanity
“survival of the fittest” - and humanity will be the fittest
focused on the growth and advancement of humanity
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERS
sees earth as something to take care of and to help grow
thinks protecting the environment is the ethical duty of humanity
adam and eve - originally put on earth as the stewards of the earth - inspiration from that story
humanity needs to implement environmental protection legislation and not overexploit resources
they need to look after the planet so it looks after them
government control/intervention as a solution - duty to intervene
ECOCENTRIC
places intrinsic value on ecosystems, organisms and the environment
believes materialistic tendencies of society are negatively effecting society
need to develop more self-sufficient societies
respects the rights of nature
deep ecologists (def). extreme ecocentrists - may place the environment on a higher level than humanity and perhaps human rights
biocentric (def). - focused on all life inside and outside of humanity
sees population growth as part of the problems the ecosystem is facing
DEEP ECOLOGISTS
more value on nature than humanity
all species and ecosystems have an intrinsic value - biorights
decrease in population is necessary to protect the environment
policies should be changed to value the environment over societies
environments should not be damaged for human comfort
humans have no rights to interfere with natural processes
EVS (def). a worldview or paradigm that shapes the way an individual perceives and evaluates environmental issues
influenced by culture, education, religion, economic context, societal context and political context
imposes certain intrinsic values on things like the environment, technology and society
ANTHROPOCENTRIC
in the middle of both views
requires societies to manage their own environmental impact
use of taxes, legislation and environmental regulation to solve or manage environmental problems
centered on humanity and its relationship with nature
humans have the responsibility to sustainably manage the environment
most prominent environmental value system within western societies
believe that humans can control and manage resources to sustain us and the earth
TECHNOCENTRIC
places value on technological solutions to environmental problems
believes that research and scientific development are necessary to solve environmental problems
cornucopians (def). extreme technocentrists - may believe that technology based solutions are the only solutions for environmental problems
sees humans as the dominant species on earth
“whatever we do, we can solve it”
CONRUCOPIANS
subset of the technocentric view
earth is there to benefit humanity and will always have enough resources to sustain us
thinks that humans will keep advancing enough to confront any problem that arises from unsustainable resource management or other practices
often believe that capitalism and a free market economy is also the best move for humanity
“survival of the fittest” - and humanity will be the fittest
focused on the growth and advancement of humanity
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERS
sees earth as something to take care of and to help grow
thinks protecting the environment is the ethical duty of humanity
adam and eve - originally put on earth as the stewards of the earth - inspiration from that story
humanity needs to implement environmental protection legislation and not overexploit resources
they need to look after the planet so it looks after them
government control/intervention as a solution - duty to intervene
ECOCENTRIC
places intrinsic value on ecosystems, organisms and the environment
believes materialistic tendencies of society are negatively effecting society
need to develop more self-sufficient societies
respects the rights of nature
deep ecologists (def). extreme ecocentrists - may place the environment on a higher level than humanity and perhaps human rights
biocentric (def). - focused on all life inside and outside of humanity
sees population growth as part of the problems the ecosystem is facing
DEEP ECOLOGISTS
more value on nature than humanity
all species and ecosystems have an intrinsic value - biorights
decrease in population is necessary to protect the environment
policies should be changed to value the environment over societies
environments should not be damaged for human comfort
humans have no rights to interfere with natural processes