UNPEACEFUL MUSIC
Repellent Music
- Peacefulness is about use and context, not inherent musical character.
- Music can repel: used to deter crowds or undesirable activity (e.g., classical music outside stores to deter youths; music in parks and transit to clear out undesirables). These uses are unpeaceful regardless of the music’s aesthetic quality.
- Example: Homer’s sirens as lure to death; beauty does not make it peaceful when used to harm.
Nationalistic Music
- National anthems often carry militaristic themes; they express pride in military power rather than universal solidarity.
- US anthem: "The Star-Spangled Banner" (militaristic imagery and resilience under fire).
- France: "La Marseillaise" (marching, avenging arms, defense of liberty).
- New Zealand: "God Defend New Zealand" (militarism framed as defense; peace through defense rather than aggression).
- Overall: militarism may be present but not necessarily directed at a specific other; context matters.
Insurrectionary Music
- Much music serves the powerful; insurrectionary music challenges power, often via content or contrast with dominant music.
- Jazz cited as insurrectionary by some analysts; music can express suffering and dreams of freedom.
- Beethoven’s music interpreted differently depending on context; under totalitarian regimes it can be claimed as anti-regime, but contexts can also co-opt music for propaganda (e.g., Nazi Germany visuals and performances).
- Barenboim and Said suggest Beethoven can symbolize freedom even under oppression; other views warn about instrumentalization by those in power.
- Peacefulness of insurrectionary music depends on outcome: it is peaceful if it seeks justice nonviolently; music itself cannot decide which side is just.
Hateful Music
- Hate music exists across history and present: e.g., 1864 Democratic national anthem satire called "Nigger Doodle Dandy".
- Modern hate music includes neo-Nazi labels and songs targeting minorities (e.g., Panzerfaust, Rahowa; lyrics invoking racial violence).
- Music can be used to recruit and mobilize hate groups, often appealing to peers and allies rather than direct targets.
- War/army use of music can manipulate soldiers’ motivation (e.g., Fahrenheit 9/11 example with combat songs used during raids).
- Distinguishing feature: hateful music builds solidarity among collaborators at the expense of others (cooperation vs. collusion).
- Contrast with unity songs like "We Are the World" that promote universal belonging rather than invidious comparison.
Capitalist Music
- The music industry exploits producers, consumers, and promotional economies; production of demand often precedes production of supply.
- Attali argues the value lies in the larger network of consumption and spectacle, not in the music object alone.
- Commodification leads to inequities and trivialization of music; music is marketed as a commodity in a global system.
- Despite vast profits and industry power, music can still resist commodification; Said’s view: music can resist acculturation and commodification.
- The book highlights resistance by using music to promote peace, illustrating that openings and free spaces exist within a dominant system.
Peace, Conflict, and the Role of Music
- Peace is about handling conflict in mature, nonviolent ways (Galtung).
- Combative music can be peaceful if it seeks justice through nonviolent means; music can operate as a counterforce to imperialism without endorsing violence.
- Victory at Sea is unpeaceful because it supports naval violence, not because of the music’s genre.
- Attali: all music is a tool for community-building; music can foster empathy and solidarity, yet it may be captured by power structures.
- Insurrectionary music tends to target insiders (peers, allies) and can function through cooperation or collusion; peaceful resistance is possible when it promotes justice nonviolently.
Concepts and Distinctions
- Peaceful vs unpeaceful depends on usage and outcome, not intrinsic sound.
- Insurrectionary music can be peaceful if it advocates justice without violence.
- Hate and war music often aim to rally allies, not persuade enemies; this solidarity can harm third parties.
- Weary of commodification: music’s social function can be reduced to a commodity, yet spaces for resistance remain.
Key Takeaways for quick recall
- Use matters more than intrinsic sound in determining peace vs unpeacefulness.
- National anthems encode militarism but can reflect defensive patriotism.
- Insurrectionary music can be peaceful if nonviolent and justice-oriented; context is decisive.
- Hate music solidifies in-group identity at others’ expense; collusion harms outside parties.
- Capitalism shapes music’s production and consumption; resistance can emphasize peace over commodification.
- Peace involves nonviolent handling of conflict; music can aid or hinder this depending on application.
References (selected)
- ABC News (2005) "Young Singers Spread Racist Hate"
- Annan, Kofi (2004) Secretary-General's remarks on music and peace
- Attali, Jacques (1985) Noise: The Political Economy of Music
- Barenboim, Daniel and Said, Edward (2002) Parallels and Paradoxes
- The Economist (2005) Classical Music and Social Control
- Said, Edward (1991) Musical Elaborations
- Shapiro, Michael (2004) Methods and Nations
- Timberg, S. (2005) Halt, or I’ll Play Vivaldi!
- Wikipedia (2005) Gangsta Rap
- Rotten Tomatoes (2005) Great Conductors of the Third Reich: Art in the Service of Evil
- Anti-Defamation League (2005) Panzerfaust updates
- Free Your Mind (2005); Fuchs (2004); Loewen (1995) Lies My Teacher Told Me
- Reich music sources and related analyses