Final Report

Office of Equal Opportunity Report

  • Date: October 15, 2024

  • Subject: Complaint of Sexual Harassment Against Major Nicholas Baker

Background

  • Complaining Party: Zoe McCall, a senior ROTC cadet at Texas Tech University (TTU).

  • Responding Party: Major Nicholas Baker, an instructor in Military Science and part of the ROTC cadre at TTU.

  • Incident Date: September 7, 2024, during a field training exercise (FTX) in Post, Texas.

  • Nature of Complaint: Third-party report of sexual harassment based on inappropriate comments made by Responding Party about sex and tattoos.

Initial Report

  • Instructor Paul Livermore submitted a report on September 17, 2024, after Complaining Party confided in him.

  • Allegations included comments such as tattoos being "sexy" and insinuations regarding sexual favors for career advancement.

Complaint Procedure

  • September 18, 2024: The Office of Equal Opportunity informed Complaining Party about the process for filing a complaint.

  • September 22, 2024: Complaining Party formally filed a sexual harassment complaint.

Interim Measures

  • No contact order was initiated between the parties; Responding Party was limited to administrative duties from home during the investigation.

Investigation Overview

  • Investigator interviewed nine individuals, including both parties and witnesses, to gather detailed accounts of the incidents during the FTX.

Complaining Party Interview Summary

  • Initial friendly interactions escalated to inappropriate comments by Responding Party regarding sex at various points during the day.

  • Complaining Party felt uncomfortable with comments about her tattoos and the implications related to her age and experience.

Witness Accounts

  • Various cadets observed Responding Party's behavior; some confirmed the inappropriateness and sexual nature of his comments.

  • Other cadets felt Responding Party was overly friendly or flirtatious, especially towards female cadets.

Findings and Conclusions

  • Comments Were Inappropriate: While some interactions were friendly, the nature of several comments was deemed highly unprofessional.

  • Policy Violation: It was determined Responding Party's conduct, while inappropriate, did not rise to the level of a policy violation according to TTUS Regulation 07.06B.

  • Recommendations: Address inappropriate behavior to prevent recurrence, especially concerning discussions about alcohol and relationships with cadets.

Summary

  • The investigation indicated a pattern of inappropriate comments by Major Baker, illustrating a lack of professionalism expected of a cadre member. The findings stress the importance of maintaining appropriate boundaries in educational settings.