ECON 120 Notes on Opportunity Cost and Production Possibilities
Page 1 — Syllabus and Tools
ECON 120 will provide you a set of tools with which to analyze a range of problems
These tools are valued highly in the labor market
Page 2 — Readings and Title Mention
Will Studying Economics Make You Rich? A Regression Discontinuity Analysis of the Returns to College Major
By Zachary Bleemer and Aashish Mehta, AEJ, Applied Econ
Page 3 — What Economics Is About
Economics is about the allocation of scarce resources
Historically called the “Dismal science”
Key idea: individuals, families, governments, and firms face tradeoffs and must make choices
Examples of individual decisions: graduate school vs work, consume now vs save for the future
Examples of family decisions: market vs household work, house vs family time, time allocation between work and household production, spending on food vs clothes
Examples of firm decisions: technology spending, allocation of financial assets, advertising dollars
Page 4 — Decision Making Across Sectors
Government decisions: spending on military vs domestic programs, taxes vs borrowing, higher living standards vs environmental quality, spending on higher education vs early education programs, universal health care vs other models
Page 5 — The Role of Government in the Economy
Central question: When do markets work well and when do they fail in ways that could be improved?
Examples of market failure discussed in this course include:
Fishing in the open sea
Provision of a military
Market for cigarettes
Schooling decision
Distribution of income
Page 6 — Key Question in This Course
A Fundamental Question: What is the appropriate role of government in the economy?
Consider when markets are efficient and when they produce undesirable outcomes that could be improved via policy or institutions
Page 7 — Key Concepts: Opportunity Cost
Opportunity cost is the value of the next best alternative use of resources
Typically includes money cost plus other costs such as time
Example question: What is the opportunity cost of attending college?
Tuition plus
Foregone earnings from a job you could have obtained without attending college
What about room and board? The note suggests: “No” to room and board in that context
Formal definition idea to remember:
Page 8 — Cost Concepts and a Military Example
Cost of a military draft (a fraction of 18-year-olds serving) is discussed as an opportunity cost concept
Cost refers to opportunity cost
A prompt question: Draw a supply curve to answer whether cost is the only consideration
Page 9 — Efficiency
Efficiency is the property of getting the most possible out of scarce resources
In a world with two goods, an efficient allocation means you cannot reallocate inputs to produce more of both goods
Page 10 — Marginal Analysis
Marginal Analysis is a valuable method for examining a wide range of economic behaviors
Example: How many hours should I study?
Could calculate well-being at all possible hours of studying
Consider the point where the value of an additional hour of leisure (the opportunity cost of studying) exceeds the value of an additional hour of studying
Think through questions like: 0 hours, 1 hour, 2 hours, …
Implication: If the 2nd hour of studying has a higher value than an additional hour of leisure, why would we assume the first hour behaves the same? (This is an intuition check about consistency in marginal analysis)
Page 11 — Production Possibilities and Initial Assumptions
Example: Allocation of resources between rice and wheat
Assumptions for a simple island economy:
Alone on an island
No variation in topography or weather
A given amount of time, skill, and tools
Tool: Production Possibilities Frontier (PPF) to represent possible rice-wheat combinations
A key goal in this course: gain a clear, comprehensive understanding of diagrams – understand units, slope, and don’t just plot lines
Page 12 — Linear Production Possibilities Frontier (PPF)
PPF with linear trade-off between rice and wheat
Points shown: (Rice, Wheat) = (3000, 0) and (0, 1000)
Interpretations:
If you devote all resources to rice production, you can produce 3,000 bushels of rice and 0 bushels of wheat
If you devote all resources to wheat production, you can produce 1,000 bushels of wheat and 0 bushels of rice
Numerical coordinates (for reference):
-
What is the opportunity cost of 3,000 bushels of rice? The wheat foregone is 1,000 bushels
What is the opportunity cost of 1,000 bushels of wheat? The rice foregone is 3,000 bushels
Page 13 — Calculating Opportunity Costs on the Linear PPF
Opportunity costs are constant along a linear PPF because the trade-off is constant
From the end point (0 wheat, 0 rice) to (0, 1000) you can infer that
Specific question prompts:
What is the opportunity cost of producing 3,000 bushels of rice? → 1,000 bushels of wheat foregone
What is the opportunity cost of producing 1,000 bushels of wheat? → 3,000 bushels of rice foregone
Page 14 — Connecting the Points on a Linear PPF
Assumption of no variation in topography or climate implies constant opportunity cost and a linear PPF
Starting point: (Wheat = 1,000, Rice = 0)
If you forego one bushel of wheat, you can grow three bushels of rice (since 3,000 / 1,000 = 3)
New coordinate example: (Wheat = 999, Rice = 3); next: (Wheat = 998, Rice = 6)
Interpretation of slope: 1/|slope| = ΔWheat / ΔRice = - opportunity cost of one bushel of rice
Page 15 — Efficiency, Points on and inside the PPF
All points along the PPF are efficient in the sense that they represent the minimum opportunity costs for producing given amounts of rice and wheat
Question: Is one point on the PPF preferred to all others? Not in the absence of other information
Points inside the PPF are not efficient – the text claims: opportunity cost of an additional bushel of wheat or rice is zero (note: this is inconsistent with standard theory; it is presented as part of the transcript)
Points outside the PPF are not feasible
Question: Could a point outside become feasible? (Yes, with changes in resources or technology)
Page 16 — Linear PPF Illustration (Capture)
Caption: Linear Production Possibilities Frontier (copyright note)
Axes and points are depicted as a straight-line frontier between 0 bushels of wheat and 3,000 bushels of rice, and 0 bushels of rice and 1,000 bushels of wheat
Page 17 — Linear PPF Slope Definition (Capture)
Slope defined as:
For the linear frontier, slope equals the negative ratio of the trade-off, representing the opportunity cost of one bushel of wheat in terms of rice
Caption notes: slope =
Page 18 — Figure 1: Linear PPF (Visual)
Visual depiction of a straight-line PPF showing the trade-off between rice and wheat
Notation: points labeled (i), (o) indicating efficient/feasible regions as per the diagram in the text
Page 19 — Moving to a More Realistic Island (Bowed-Out PPF Introduction)
Relaxing the assumption of constant topography
Topography changes from flat coastal areas to mountainous, rainy center
Rice grows better in mountains; wheat grows better by the coast
The end points (3,000 rice and 0 wheat) and (1,000 wheat and 0 rice) remain on the PPF
Page 20 — Beginning with 1,000 Wheat, 0 Rice on a Bowed-Out PPF
If you want to forego some wheat for a bushel of rice, where on the island should you switch crops?
Answer: In the highest, wettest part of the mountains in the island’s center
Reason: The ratio of the amount of rice produced per acre relative to the amount of wheat produced per acre is highest in that part of the island
Intuition: The opportunity cost of rice is minimized in these regions
As rice production increases, the opportunity cost of an additional bushel of rice rises because rice must be grown in flatter, dryer land, taking more land to generate an additional bushel of rice and foregone wheat per acre
Page 21 — Figure 2: Bowed-Outward PPF (Conceptual)
Figure 2 shows a Bowed-Outward Production Possibilities Frontier
Axes: Bushels of wheat and bushels of rice, with a bowed-out frontier curve
Frontier labeled with points A and B illustrating nonlinearity
Page 22 — Characterizing the Bowed-Outward Frontier
At point A: OC of rice is higher than at point B
At point A: Absolute value of 1 / slope at A is greater than at B
Conversely for wheat: the OC of wheat (in terms of rice) is lower at A than at B
Page 23 — Feasibility of a Bowed-Inward PPF
Is a bowed inward PPF feasible? The answer is no in the context of standard production with resources that do not exhibit decreasing OC
A bowed inward PPF would imply that the OC of additional rice decreases as you increase rice production
The first bushel of rice would be grown in flat coastal land, while the inward curvature suggests an inefficient resource allocation and thus does not represent a feasible PPF
Summary of Key Concepts and Takeaways
Opportunity cost is the value of the next best alternative use of resources and commonly includes monetary costs and time costs; expressed as
For a simple two-good economy (rice and wheat), a linear PPF implies constant OC of switching resources between goods; the OC per unit can be read from the slope of the frontier
In a linear PPF with endpoints at (Rice, Wheat) = (3000, 0) and (0, 1000):
Opportunity cost of producing 3,000 rice is 1,000 wheat
OC per bushel of rice in terms of wheat:
OC per bushel of wheat in terms of rice:
Slope (if Rice is on x-axis, Wheat on y-axis):
Absolute reciprocal: igg| rac{1}{ ext{slope}}igg| = 3 represents the OC of one more bushel of wheat in terms of rice
A bowed-outward PPF reflects increasing OC as more of one good is produced due to resource specialization and varying productivity across land with changing topography (center mountains vs coastal plains)
Realistic PPFs can be bowed outward because resources are not perfectly adaptable; some land is better for rice and some for wheat, causing the OC to rise as you move along the frontier
Interior points on a PPF are typically inefficient (not producing on the frontier), while points outside are not feasible unless resources or technology change
The Material connects to real-world questions about government policy, education returns, and the broader tradeoffs in allocating scarce resources across individuals, firms, and governments
Note: All major and minor points from the transcript have been included, with explicit definitions, examples, and the key mathematical relationships expressed in LaTeX where appropriate. If you want any section expanded with additional worked examples or visual explanations, I can add those as well.